Placeholder Content Image

Blackout bungle sees sisters marry the wrong grooms

<p>Two sisters have accidentally married the wrong grooms during their joint wedding, as a power cut caused a confusing blackout. </p> <p>The ceremony was happening in the village of Aslana in Madhya Pradesh state, India, when the unfortunate blackout wreaked havoc with the proceedings.</p> <p>During the confusion, the priest continued to read out the marriage rites, but accidentally confused the couples. </p> <p>The brides’ father Ramesh Lal suggested the priest may have been confused since the two women were both in red dresses with veils over their faces.</p> <p>When the mistake was realised, it was later rectified. </p> <p>Blackouts and power cuts have been more common in India, as unusually high temperatures continue to tear through the country. </p> <p>These surging temperatures have seen a surge in demand for energy, with many companies resorting to intermittent power cuts in order to cope with the demand. </p> <p>More than a billion people across south Asia are facing a record-breaking heat wave which leaves them "gasping in whatever shade they find".</p> <p>Temperatures in northern India<a id="mol-de96b2e2-d097-11ec-861e-fba9b27a3e26" href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/pakistan/index.html"> </a>have spiked to 47C as neighbouring Pakistan suffered its hottest March for 61 years.</p> <p>Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi said in April, "Temperatures are rising rapidly in the country, and rising much earlier than usual."</p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

Relationships

Placeholder Content Image

Police urgently sworn in after MAJOR bungle

<p dir="ltr">More than 1000 officers have been <a href="https://7news.com.au/news/victoria-police/hundreds-of-vic-police-wrongly-sworn-in-c-5819028" target="_blank" rel="noopener">urgently sworn in</a> by Victoria Police after news emerged of an admin stuff-up.</p> <p dir="ltr">A change in legislation in 2013 has meant assistant commissioning officers have been swearing in graduating police officers without the appropriate power.</p> <p dir="ltr">As a result, affected officers have been making arrests, pressing charges and issuing orders without the valid powers to do so.</p> <p dir="ltr">The mistake extended beyond the officers, with a final tally of 1076 police officers, 157 protective service officers and 29 police custody officers being incorrectly sworn-in over the last eight years.</p> <p dir="ltr">Victoria Police said three assistant commissioners have already sworn in about 660 officers and protective service officers via videolink, with another 570 remaining.</p> <p dir="ltr">Officers have taken their oath during their first shift back at work, commencing their duties immediately afterwards.</p> <p dir="ltr">“This is an oversight, it’s an administrative oversight, it has some significant consequences for a short period of time,” Chief Commissioner Shane Patton told reporters.</p> <p dir="ltr">Though it is unclear how many court cases have been affected by the error, Mr Patton said it would be a “case by case analysis” to determine whether people could contest arrests or charges.</p> <p dir="ltr">“If someone wants to contest a matter, we would adjourn it and step through and analyse the specifics of that,” he said.</p> <p dir="ltr">“It may be that an officer, who comes within the scope of what we’ve been discussing here, is with another police officer who is not so affected and therefore the arrest may be totally valid.</p> <p dir="ltr">“There’s a whole range of scenarios.”</p> <p dir="ltr">The state government has also promised to introduce legislation addressing the situation at parliament’s next sitting.</p> <p dir="ltr">Police Minister Lisa Neville said the new laws would address past decisions, including arrests and charges issued by affected officers.</p> <p dir="ltr">“We’ve got to get this right, it will rectify all that and all those matters will stand,” she said.</p> <p dir="ltr">“Now someone in the meantime might try to contest, but with the support of the opposition … we’ll get this through very quickly and it won’t really be an opportunity for people to have any matters overturned.”</p> <p dir="ltr">However, Ms Neville said certain instances - such as family violence safety notices - “still have validity” since they are approved by a sergeant.</p> <p dir="ltr">The Police Association of Victoria also said it would support members affected by the error and ensure their legal and industrial rights were protected.</p> <p><span id="docs-internal-guid-941e0e7e-7fff-2b40-ec12-24bf59529def"></span></p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image: @victoriapolice (Instagram)</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Millions paid out in Christmas banking bungle

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A UK bank made a costly Christmas mistake by paying a total of £130 million ($AUD 245 million) to customers on December 25.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In a statement released on December 30, British lender Santander said the large sum was split over 75,000 transactions from about 2000 businesses with accounts at the bank.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“We’re sorry that due to a technical issue, some payments from our corporate clients were incorrectly duplicated on the recipients’ accounts,” the bank </span><a href="https://7news.com.au/business/banking/uk-bank-mistakenly-pays-out-nearly-250-million-in-colossal-christmas-day-disaster-c-5140630"><span style="font-weight: 400;">said</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“None of our clients were at any point left out of pocket as a result and we will be working hard with many banks across the UK to recover the duplicated transactions over the coming days.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The bank blamed the duplicated payments on a scheduling issue, with the second payment funded by Santander.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Santander added that the transactions included regular and one-off payments which may have included supplier payments or wages.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Initial reports from </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Times</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> said account holders included Barclays, Virgin Money, and HSBC.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">According to the statement, Santander is working to recover the funds from rival banks who received the payments through the “bank error recovery process”.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">However, it was unclear how the banks would respond if customers had already spent the money, where asking customers to repay the funds could push them into overdraft.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A payroll manager affected by the error </span><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.bbc.com/news/business-59826345" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: 400;">told the </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">BBC</span></em></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> it had cast a shadow on Christmas and Boxing Day.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“It ruined my holiday period because I thought I’d paid out hundreds of thousands in error - I thought I had done something wrong,” they said.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“I thought it was just me and that I was going to get in trouble at work.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The manager added that Santander hadn’t said how the second payment should be explained to staff or how the funds would be recovered.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“It’s just a complete shambles,” they said. “How they are going to recover it, I just don’t know.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Santander UK - a subsidiary of global bank Banco Santander - has 14 million active customers and 616 branches, according to its website.</span></p> <p><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Image: Getty Images</span></em></p>

Money & Banking

Placeholder Content Image

Coles called out over hilariously bungled order

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Coles has been labelled a “total joke” following a blunder in one of their online orders.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In a Facebook post, Emma, a customer who opted to only share her first name, shared the mishap after she received an email stating she would receive mandarins in place of two brown onions included in her online order.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Though Emma could see the humour in the situation, she could not believe how two radically different items could be considered as appropriate substitutes for each other.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Would I be able to get an explanation of how this substitute is even a remotely equivalent product?” she wrote.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Emma acknowledged product substitutions were a possibility when placing an online order.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“I understand that when an item is not available, an equivalent product may be substituted in its place at no extra cost, but I just don’t see how a mandarin could be seen as a suitable substitute for onions,” she posted.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A Coles employee commented on the post and claimed the customer’s “personal shopper would have done their best to find you the closest product to the one you ordered”, saying they were “sorry to hear” about her “poor experience”.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Other commenters shared their doubts that Coles had tried their hardest to find an appropriate substitution and asked “how an onion is close to a citrus fruit”.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In a plot twist, Emma shared with Yahoo News Australia that when the order arrived, there were the brown onions she ordered and no mandarins.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“I was fully expecting to have a mandarin in the bags somewhere. But nope, ended up getting what I ordered,” she said.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The order arrived shortly after she received the email and made the post about the substitution on Coles’ Facebook page.</span></p>

Food & Wine

Placeholder Content Image

Woman's perfect response after bungled Woolies delivery

<p>A Woolies shopper has taken to TikTok to share the hilarious alternative to triple-A batteries after the supermarket was out of stock.</p> <p>The video by @gracevp102 which has been watched over 130,000 times shows the woman replace batteries with the next best thing: Bread.</p> <p>“Is there anyone here that works for Woolies?” Grace asks in the clip.</p> <p>“So I ordered triple A batteries and they swapped me with a loaf of bread … I’m allergic to wheat.”</p> <p>Seeing the funny side of the situation, Grace then shared footage of her using the bread in place of the batteries she had really needed to fix her smoke alarm and recharge her TV remote.</p> <p><img style="width: 376.20578778135047px; height: 500px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7838529/screen-shot-2020-10-30-at-113435-am.png" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/a35172c3bb22456faa975ce6b9108012" /></p> <p>A Woolworths spokesman told news.com.au that while their personal shoppers work hard they’re also understandably human and make mistakes.</p> <p>“We know it’s frustrating when our substitutes are wrong and we apologise to the customer for missing the mark on this occasion,” they said.</p> <p>“Our team of personal shoppers work hard to pick perfect orders for our customers, but they’re human and don’t get it right every time.</p> <p>“We’re happy to offer refunds when we get it wrong and will contact the customer to offer one.”</p> <p>Many viewers found the video hilarious, posting comments about their own experiences.</p> <p>“We ordered 5kg of potatoes and got a single potato in a plastic bag,” one person wrote.</p> <p>“I ordered So Good soy vanilla ice cream and they replaced it with cookies and cream,” one comment read.</p> <p>“I’m allergic to gluten and dairy.”</p> <p>“You did it wrong, you’re supposed to put the bread inside of the remote,” another joked. “But yeah I always get random things.”</p>

Food & Wine

Placeholder Content Image

Parents receive $5 million over bungled baby birth

<p><span>A couple in Perth will keep their $5.2 million in damages after their child suffered severe and lifelong brain injuries during birth after a court challenge.</span><br /><br /><span>It has been revealed that during Cooper Ellis' birth at Bentley Hospital in August 2009, doctor Hamza Amira repeatedly tried to use an instrumental delivery, specifically one using vacuum extraction devices.</span><br /><br /><span>Cooper was eventually delivered via a combination of techniques.</span><br /><br /><span>However it was during the birthing process he was deprived of oxygen and his heart rate flatlined.</span><br /><br /><span>The young boy required resuscitation and also suffered other injuries.</span><br /><br /><span>His parents Chris Ellis and Michelle Hoglin launched legal action against the East Metropolitan Health Service and claimed that Cooper's injuries were a result of the horrifying circumstances of his birth.</span><br /><br /><span>WA District Court Judge Michael Gething sided with the family in 2018, saying Dr Amira's negligence caused Cooper's birth injuries.</span><br /><br /><span>He also acknowledged that his subsequent developmental and cognitive impairments were due to the birthing process.</span><br /><br /><span>The EMHS took the case to the WA Court of Appeal, but on Thursday the application was thrown out.</span><br /><br /><span>The appeal judges said the birth was "prolonged and difficult".</span><br /><br /><span>"(Cooper) did not take his first breath until five minutes after birth and underwent resuscitation for 20 minutes," they said.</span><br /><br /><span>The infant did not start moving his legs until an hour after birth, the judge added.</span><br /><br /><span>Slater and Gordon principal lawyer Jeffrey Potter said in a statement the firm was pleased to have assisted the family to succeed with the complex case.</span><br /><br /><span>Mr Potter said Cooper's parents were relieved their "long and hard-fought battle" was finally over.</span><br /><br /><span>Now they will continue to focus on their 11-year-old son's ongoing care.</span><br /><br /><span>The $5.2 million will go towards ensuring Cooper has the support he will need for the rest of his life.</span></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

"Bungling idiots": Jacinda Ardern's bad week with press

<p>Despite New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern initially being praised for the way her country handled the coronavirus pandemic, it appears the tide has turned.</p> <p>Her administration has been called "bungling idiots", her coalition government has been accused of "tearing itself apart" and Ardern who was previously seen as untouchable has been accused of telling a "complete lie" about her handling of the pandemic.</p> <p>Two British visitors on June 7th arrived into the country, where they were placed in hotel quarantine for 14 days.</p> <p>Six days later, the health ministry decreed that everyone in quarantine would be allowed out after two negative COVID-19 tests.</p> <p>The two arrivals were allowed to leave quarantine on compassionate grounds and drove 650kms to Wellington to visit a dying relative.</p> <p>Unfortunately, the pair got lost and met up with a couple of friends who gave them directions. The pair both tested positive for coronavirus after arriving in Wellington.</p> <p>It has since emerged that the women weren't tested in the hotel, not even once.</p> <p>Naturally, Ardern said it was an "unacceptable failure" and "cannot be repeated" as it was the nation's first COVID-19 cases for three weeks.</p> <p>There had already been plenty of early releases from quarantine, with 50 other visitors had been allowed out of quarantine on compassionate grounds with just four people being tested for coronavirus.</p> <p>If this wasn't bad enough, more news came to light.</p> <p>Out of the 2,519 people who left quarantine between June 9th and June 16th, most who completed the 14 days in quarantine, only 1,010 were tested for coronavirus.</p> <p>Of the rest, around 800 people vanished and failed to get into contact with the authorities to arrange a test.</p> <p>National leader Todd Muller said that the debacle was a "national disgrace".</p> <p>David Seymour, leader of the minor party ACT was much more direct.</p> <p>“These bungling idiots couldn't run a bath let alone a border,” he said. “We’re supposed to have the world’s smartest borders. We now have the world’s dumbest borders.”</p> <p>As election day nears, Senior National MP Judith Collins called into question Ardern's character on <em>The AM Show</em>.</p> <p>“We have been lied to actually. We have been lied to about the quarantine, about the standard of care," she said.</p> <p>When asked who had lied, she said "the prime minister and the health ministry".</p> <p>Labour MP Willie Jackson was having none of the accusations.</p> <p>“I think we are going a bit over the line if you are going to start accusing the prime minister of lying,” he said on the same show.</p> <p>“She is a person of huge integrity and very honest.”</p> <p>He hoped voters would “cut us a bit of slack given the integrity of the prime minister”.</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

The palace bungles Princess Eugenie wedding tweet – can you spot the blunder?

<p>The official Royal Family twitter account was forced to delete one tweet about Princess Eugenie’s upcoming wedding because of a glaring error.</p> <p>The Queen’s granddaughter is set to say “I do” to her fiancé later today in St George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle – the same location as Prince Harry and Meghan’s wedding earlier this year.</p> <p>Although it is the second royal wedding of the year, the error in the tweet led fans to question whether less attention is being given to Eugenie’s nuptials.</p> <p>Can you spot the mistake in this tweet?</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img style="width: 500px; height: 275.97402597402595px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7821307/2.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/a6f0971ae6f14875a778ebcfa720ace4" /></p> <p>The tweet bungled the name of Eugenie’s partner, referring to him as Mr Jacksbrook rather than his correct surname, Mr Brooksbank.</p> <p>The account, which has 3.81 million followers, quickly received backlash for the typo.</p> <p>One person replied: “I believe “Bank Jacksbrook” is his super secret spy name.”</p> <p>Another said: “It’s Jack Brooksbank, or Jacksbrook to his rapper crew.”</p> <p>The tweet stayed on the account for 40 minutes until someone alerted the Royals to the error.</p> <p>The tweet was later reposted with the correct spelling.</p> <p>Eugenie, 28, will have a traditional church service which will be followed by the newlyweds embarking on a carriage ride through the streets of Windsor.</p> <p>Guests will then move to the Queen’s residence for an afternoon reception at Windsor Castle.</p> <p>In the evening, there will be a formal sit-down dinner at the Royal Lodge in Windsor, the residence of her parents Andrew and Sarah Ferguson.</p> <p>The following day, the newlyweds and their friends and family will be enjoying a festival-themed afternoon party.</p> <p>Princess Eugenie first met Jack when she was 20 years old while at a Swiss holiday resort in Verbier.</p> <p>Will you be tuning in to watch Princess Eugenie’s wedding tonight? Let us know in the comments. </p>

Technology

Placeholder Content Image

Wife’s battle over bungled $200K life insurance: “I won, my husband lost”

<p>Cheryl Sayers was caught in an unimaginable battle when AMP incorrectly cancelled her husband Lee’s life insurance just months before he died of a terminal illness.</p> <p>The couple’s final months together were tainted by AMP’s unforgiveable failure and so Cheryl fought to hold the insurance giant accountable.</p> <p>“I didn't honestly believe that anyone could beat an insurance company,” Cheryl told <em>A Current Affair</em>.</p> <p>The Sydney mother-of-three forfeited a $78,000 non-disclosure payout to share her story, in the hope of helping other Australians who have been wronged in the same way.</p> <p>“I was not going to let them shut me up,” she said.</p> <p>“There are a lot more people out there that this has happened to."</p> <p>In 2011, AMP cancelled Lee’s life insurance policy without warning, falsely claiming he had insufficient funds to pay for it.</p> <p>According to Cheryl, her late husband had “never missed a payment” and had paid close to $80,000 in premiums.</p> <p style="text-align: center;"><img width="497" height="280" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7818791/2_497x280.jpg" alt="2 (84)"/></p> <p>If the policy had been in place, the couple would have received the $200,000 payout when Lee was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, eight months before he passed away.</p> <p>The couple had dreamed of using the money to go on a Europe river cruise but were forced to work right up until Lee’s death, while also trying to fight AMP’s incorrect policy cancellation.</p> <p>“That policy would have allowed Lee to retire, to spend quality time with his children and myself,” Cheryl said.</p> <p>“You’re at a loss. You've lost your husband and you look like you're going to lose your home and you're at a loss what to do.”</p> <p>But Cheryl chose to represent herself and fought AMP and their high-paid lawyers.</p> <p>In 2014, her persistence paid off when the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal ruled in her favour.</p> <p>“I had won, but my husband had lost,” Cheryl said. </p> <p>AMP agreed to pay Cheryl the $200,000 payout. She estimates that she was also owed around $80,000 in interest and costs but AMP said they would only pay the funds if she signed a non-disclosure agreement. </p>

Retirement Income

Placeholder Content Image

Woman misses out on seeing dying mum after plane ticket bungle

<p><span>Carrol Amrich was already seated on the plane, ready to visit her dying mother, when she was removed by United Airlines’ staff minutes before take-off.</span></p> <p><span>The gate agent informed her that her ticket had been cancelled, and despite her pleas she was told “nobody flies for free”.</span></p> <p><span>Carrol offered to pay for another ticket but wasn’t allowed back on board, with the airline claiming that the plane had already left.</span></p> <p><span>The ticket bungle was due to a technicality. The ticket for the flight had been purchased by her landlord.</span></p> <p><span>Traveler Help Desk, the company that sold the ticket, cancelled it because her landlord had made a change directly with United rather than going through the company. However, at the time the airline assured them it was fine to do so.</span></p> <p><span>Distressed and desperate, Carrol received no help from the airline so she was left to drive to her mother from Colorado to Minnesota.</span></p> <p><span>She called her mother, begging her to hold on a little while longer while she embarked on her long journey ahead.</span></p> <p><span>The next time her phone rang, it was to tell her that her mother had passed away.</span></p> <p><span>“I drove 1000 miles (1610 kilometres), and she was gone before I got here,” Ms. Amrich told the </span><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/26/business/united-airlines-traveler-help-desk.html" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><em>New York Times</em></strong></span></a><span> two days later.</span></p> <p><span>“I never stopped to rest. I went straight through. And she was gone.</span></p> <p><span>“I cried the whole way from Pueblo. I’ve been awake for two days. I haven’t eaten for two days.”</span></p> <p><span>Traveler Help Desk spokeswoman Carolyn Gallant confirmed the ticket had been cancelled as a protection against fraud.</span></p> <p><span>“I am just so sorry for Ms Amrich’s loss,” Ms Gallant said.</span></p> <p><span>“I understand it was unfortunate the ticket ended up voided. Had she contacted us directly to make the change, this all would have been avoided.”</span></p> <p><span>The flight date had been changed when her mother’s health worsened, requiring Carrol to visit immediately.</span></p> <p><span>United Airlines claimed on the phone that it was fine to make the change through them instead of Traveler Help Desk. </span></p>

Travel Trouble

Our Partners