Placeholder Content Image

Victorian man’s anti-Dan Andrews plates deemed “offensive” by government

<p dir="ltr">A Victorian man could lose his personalised number plates referencing Premier Daniel Andrews after the state government’s transport body said they had deemed them to be “offensive” and “inappropriate”.</p> <p dir="ltr">In September, Peter Dunlevie received plates that read, “DANOUT”, from VicRoads and attached them to his 2003 Commodore ahead of the state election on November 23.</p> <p dir="ltr">“Well, I want Andrews gone,” he told <em>7NEWS</em>.</p> <p dir="ltr">“I’m just sick of him.”</p> <p><span id="docs-internal-guid-907adc51-7fff-b3f2-85a0-ade8c73e54ba"></span></p> <p dir="ltr">The plates are accompanied by other anti-Andrews messages, including stickers reading, “Save Victoria” and “SACK ANDREWS”.</p> <p dir="ltr"><img src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/2022/11/danout1.jpg" alt="" width="880" height="495" /></p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Peter Dunlevie attached plates reading ‘DANOUT’ to his white Commodore. Image: 7NEWS</em></p> <p dir="ltr">However, VicRoads has since written to the Gippsland man and told him to return the plates, writing that the plates are “negative”, “offensive” and “inappropriate”.</p> <p dir="ltr">“A review of our records has identified that the combination ‘DANOUT’ has specific negative references, and may be considered offensive by the broader community,” the letter read.</p> <p dir="ltr">Dunlevie has questioned VicRoads’ assessment of the plates, telling the news outlet that it’s just “a bit of fun”.</p> <p dir="ltr">“What’s offensive about them?” he said.</p> <p dir="ltr">“This is just an old bloke having a bit of fun.”</p> <p dir="ltr">While VicRoads has the authority to cancel personalised plates, Dunlevie said he felt like the transport authority was “trying to gag me”.</p> <p dir="ltr">Following the letter from VicRoads, the state’s Department of Transport has begun a review into the decision to remove the plates from Dunlevie.</p> <p dir="ltr"><span id="docs-internal-guid-2976ccdd-7fff-1b07-2086-9bc20f7378ca"></span></p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image: 7NEWS</em></p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

Andrew Gaze slams Gina Rinehart for not condemning her father's offensive comments

<p>Basketball legend Andrew Gaze has slammed millionaire mining magnate Gina Rinehart for failing to condemn her father's past comments about Indigenous Australians. </p> <p>The fallout of a $15 million Netball Australia partnership with Rinehart’s Hancock Prospecting stems from comments made by Gina's father, Lang Hancock, in the 1980s.</p> <p>Hancock Prospecting backed out on the lucrative partnership on Saturday, leaving the sporting organisation on the brink of financial ruin.</p> <p>Indigenous player Donnell Wallam was said to be uncomfortable wearing a uniform with the company’s logo after Hancock made the offensive comments in the 1984 documentary <em>Couldn’t be Fairer</em>, eight years before his death.</p> <p>“Those that have been assimilated into earning good living and earning wages among the civilised areas and have been accepted into society and can handle society, I’d leave them well alone,” he said at the time.</p> <p>“The ones that are no good to themselves … I would dope the water up so that they were sterile and would breed themselves out in the future, and that would solve the problem.”</p> <p>Now, Andrew Gaze has come out swinging against Rinehart, calling for her to distance herself from the damaging comments. </p> <p>“She (Gina Rinehart) could have apologised for her father’s comments, distanced herself from them and told us that she doesn’t believe those things. Instead, she pulled her money out,” he said.</p> <p>“I am not blaming Gina Rinehart for her father’s comments, but what I don’t understand is why she won’t very publicly disassociate herself from them,” Gaze said on SEN The Run Home.</p> <p>“(She should say), ‘I love my dad, but (that was wrong)’."</p> <p>“If my dad had said that, or if my uncle, or anyone associated with me, or if my friend said it, (I would say), ‘I love this person, I’m still going to love him, but I’m going to educate him, I’m going to say, no, that is not the right way to deal with that issue, it is actually vile what you’ve said’.”</p> <p>“If you can’t reconsider that, then I’m going to question our friendship, if you’re going to maintain that view, then you’re not a friend of mine."</p> <p>While a string of right-wing politicians have called out the netball team for being ungrateful, everyday Aussies have wondered why Rinehart is staying silent. </p> <p>“If I can be held accountable for the actions of every South Sudanese person in Australia, then Gina Rinehart can acknowledge the actions of the man she inherited her fortune from,” wrote Melbourne-based South Sudanese artist, Atong Atem.</p> <p>“It would amount to ABSOLUTELY nothing without action. Literally folks are asking her to do good PR via empty gesture but it’s only fair.”</p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

DJ slammed for playing offensive song to disabled prom queen

<p>A DJ has faced major backlash online after playing Ed Sheeran’s hit single “thinking out loud” as a handicapped prom queen took to the dance floor in her wheelchair.</p> <p>The opening line of the song being “when your legs don’t work like they used to before” was played for Sarah – who was in her wheelchair set to dance with the prom king. Things certainly turned awkward as those in the crowd gasped.</p> <p>Sarah Mendenhall, 23, suffers from a rare neurological condition called Acute Flaccid Myelitis (AFM), which causes muscle weakness and sometimes paralysis, was crowned as prom queen at her school dance when the unfortunate incident took place.</p> <p>A video posted to TikTok by classmate Celeste Orozco showed the two standing in the center of the dance floor while someone placed crowns on their heads; but when the song came on, many people at the event became uncomfortable.</p> <p>Numerous onlookers in the crowd showed their discomfort by letting out gasps and yelling at the DJ, whose identity remains unknown.</p> <p>'This would haunt me the rest of my life if I were the DJ,' Celeste captioned the clip, which has been viewed more than 17 million times.</p> <blockquote class="tiktok-embed" style="max-width: 605px; min-width: 325px;" cite="https://www.tiktok.com/@celesteiliana__/video/7114819205861608747" data-video-id="7114819205861608747"> <section><a title="@celesteiliana__" href="https://www.tiktok.com/@celesteiliana__" target="_blank" rel="noopener">@celesteiliana__</a> a prom queen crowning moment to remember <a title="fyp" href="https://www.tiktok.com/tag/fyp" target="_blank" rel="noopener">#fyp</a> <a title="foryoupage" href="https://www.tiktok.com/tag/foryoupage" target="_blank" rel="noopener">#foryoupage</a> <a title="highschool" href="https://www.tiktok.com/tag/highschool" target="_blank" rel="noopener">#highschool</a> <a title="promqueen" href="https://www.tiktok.com/tag/promqueen" target="_blank" rel="noopener">#promqueen</a> <a title="♬ original sound - Celeste Orozco" href="https://www.tiktok.com/music/original-sound-7114819186958715694" target="_blank" rel="noopener">♬ original sound - Celeste Orozco</a></section> </blockquote> <p>However, Sarah wants everyone to know that she wasn't offended by the song choice.</p> <p>'Hey everyone so this is me,' she wrote in the comment section of the viral clip. 'I found it really funny and ironic.'</p> <p>She added that she 'didn’t know what was playing until way after' because she was so focused on trying to 'dance.'</p> <p>Celeste added, 'We had a great prom night and a good laugh about it the next day.'</p> <p>It appeared that Sarah, who was diagnosed with the autoimmune disease in October 2016, had an amazing night despite the mishap, posting a clip of herself spinning around in the wheelchair on the dance floor to her own TikTok account, writing, 'Just making a core memory. Thats all.'</p> <p><em>Images: Tiktok</em></p>

Body

Placeholder Content Image

Woman kicked off flight for “offensive” pants

<p dir="ltr">A DJ who was kicked off a flight for her “inappropriate” and “offensive” pants has claimed she was “humiliated” in front of everyone. </p> <p dir="ltr">South Korean DJ Hwang So-hee, also known as DJ Soda, was on a flight from JFK to LAX with American Airlines on April 25 when she was kicked off. </p> <p dir="ltr">She was left fuming over her treatment and took to Twitter to document the ordeal to her 127,000 followers.</p> <p dir="ltr">“I GOT KICKED OFF FROM  @AmericanAir flight and they harassed me to take off my sponsored @RIPNDIP 'F**K YOU' sweatpants in front of people to board again,” she began. </p> <p dir="ltr">“Yesterday coming back from JFK to LAX with American Airlines, I was harassed and humiliated. I was forced out of the plane and was harassed to take off my pants in front of the flight crews at the gate.</p> <p dir="ltr">“I have never had an issue with wearing this pair of pants before in my many months of touring in North America and they did not have any problem with me wearing it at the time of check-in nor when I sat down at my seat.”</p> <p dir="ltr">DJ Soda claims she was approached by a staff member who told her to pack up her things and that she would not be boarding the flight.</p> <p dir="ltr">They then made comments about her pants calling them “inappropriate” and “offensive” and that she would have the next flight.</p> <p dir="ltr">She explained that she could not afford to miss the flight due to a very important meeting.</p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> <p dir="ltr" lang="en">I GOT KICKED OFF FROM <a href="https://twitter.com/AmericanAir?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AmericanAir</a> flight and they harassed me to take off my sponsored <a href="https://twitter.com/RIPNDIP?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RIPNDIP</a> 'F**K YOU' sweatpants in front of people to board again. <a href="https://t.co/YU0TrhZjry">pic.twitter.com/YU0TrhZjry</a></p> <p>— djsoda (@dj_soda_) <a href="https://twitter.com/dj_soda_/status/1518850282490187776?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 26, 2022</a></p></blockquote> <p dir="ltr">“I pleaded to stay on the flight but was ignored by the staff and the flight attendants. I even offered to get changed but the request was denied. What happened next was horrendous,” DJ Soda continued. </p> <p dir="ltr">“With my broken fingers, I hardly ended up taking off my pants in front of the whole crew and standing half-naked while they still refused to board me on the flight. They even sarcastically commented that I could have taken off my pants earlier.</p> <p dir="ltr">“When they finally let me enter, I put my pants inside out and finally sat down after an hour of delay causing inconvenience to the members of the flights on board.</p> <p dir="ltr">“I was mortified and trembling in fear for the next 6 hours on my flight back to LA. In my 8 years of touring, I have never experienced or been treated unfairly, especially in a country that is known for its freedom of speech and individuality.</p> <p dir="ltr">“From now on, I will be boycotting @AmericanAir and hope this NEVER happens to anyone ever again.”</p> <p dir="ltr">DJ Soda was called out by fans who said she was in the wrong, especially since it’s common knowledge to dress appropriately on flights.</p> <p dir="ltr">“Maybe other airlines didn't previously notice; but it is common knowledge that most major airlines have dress policies that prohibit profanity and vulgarity on their flights. They have every right to protect their customers' values. Sorry. No sympathy here.” someone wrote.</p> <p dir="ltr">“That's what you get for dressing inappropriately on an airliner, you're on their plane, their rules. You can fly with Delta, United, Southwest or even pulling TWA back from the grave and they would still kick you out,” another commented.</p> <p dir="ltr">“As well you SHOULD!  It's rude, offensive, and children can READ TOO!! But some of us adults don't want to see or hear it either! America might be the land of the free, but it doesn't mean we don't have some rules. Abide by them or leave!” another wrote.</p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Images: Twitter</em></p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

ABC responds to "offensive" Craig McLachlan accusations

<p>The ABC is fighting back at "offensive" allegations it "manipulated" Craig McLachlan's accusers.</p> <p>In January 2018, multiple media organisations published allegations McLachlan had indecently assaulted four women during a 2014 stage production of The Rocky Horror Picture Show.</p> <p>Victoria Police charged him later with seven counts of indecent assault and six counts of common law assault against four women on the set of The Rocky Horror Show in 2014.</p> <p>He was acquitted of all charges in December last year.</p> <p>The actor broke his silence earlier in the month in a highly emotional interview with Channel 7's Spotlight.</p> <p>The program aired claims the ABC had "manipulated" McLachlan's accusers when it interviewed the women in 2018.</p> <p>In one segment from<span> </span><em>Spotlight,<span> </span></em>an off-air ABC producer can be heard saying to one of the women: “I’m just looking for a sharp, short you said: ‘this is predatory behaviour, it wasn’t a one off, and when we all shared our stories we realised how calculated he was’.”</p> <p>Then ABC reporter Lorna Knowles said: “I don’t think we should be putting words into her mouth to some extent.”</p> <p>The actor is suing the ABC and Nine newspapers over reports of the 2014 allegations for which he was tried and acquitted.</p> <p>ABC rejected the allegations in a statement today, saying it was "offensive".</p> <p>“In January 2018, the ABC reported allegations made by three women regarding actor Craig McLachlan. The broadcast and online stories included interviews with these women,” an ABC spokeswoman said.</p> <p>“Last week the Seven Network aired claims, since repeated elsewhere, that the women interviewed were ‘manipulated’ by an ABC producer and reporter ‘to say certain things’.</p> <p>“Seven producer Mark Llewellyn subsequently claimed the women were ‘coached’ and that there was ‘clear evidence of words being put in (their) mouths’.</p> <p>“The ABC rejects these claims. They are also offensive to the women who stepped forward to tell their stories.”</p> <p>The ABC spokeswoman said the clips shown on<span> </span><em>Spotlight<span> </span></em>had been “selectively edited” and were taken out of context.</p> <p>“Seven has selectively edited raw footage and used very brief grabs without full context from near the end of an almost hour-long interview with one of the women,” the ABC said.</p> <p>“The unedited footage shows the interviewee was asked to repeat in a more succinct way statements she had already made on-camera.</p> <p>“This is a normal television industry practice in some cases to ensure content is presented in a clear way for viewers.</p> <p>“At the time of the original story the ABC offered Mr McLachlan the opportunity of an interview, sent him detailed questions and ran his responses extensively.”</p> <p>Channel 7’s Mark Llewelyn, the executive producer of<span> </span><em>Spotlight</em>, told<span> </span><em>The Australian<span> </span></em>that the ABC had put aside its “ethical responsibilities”.</p> <p>“No matter how comfortable it feels on the high moral ground it doesn’t mean you can put aside your ethical responsibilities as journalists,” he said.</p> <p>“It’s too easy to think you’re infallible and the story is ‘so important’ that the means justify the ends. Well, they don’t.”</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Ben Fordham calls out fake Fairy Bread petition

<p><span>A number of Australian outlets have been left red-faced after declaring there was a big push to rename Fairy Bread, due to it being offensive.</span><br /><br /><span>However, the story has been declared a hoax after the original poster came out and confirmed the sham – a fact which many eagle-eyed OverSixty readers were also quick to realise.</span><br /><br /><span>A petition at Change.org was launched a few weeks ago by a person named Alexis Chaise, who furiously declared that the party food, consisting of white bread, margarine, and sprinkles, was “enjoyed by countless Australians, but to this day maintains its distasteful name.”</span><br /><br /><span>Alexis was seemingly outraged at the phrase “fairy” being used in 2021.</span><br /><br /><span>2GB host Ben Fordham said it didn’t take him very long to pick up on the sham, and swiftly called out well-known prankster team The Chaser.</span><br /><br /><span>He pinpointed that Alexis Chaise is actually a lounge that can be purchased for $799 at Lounge Lovers.</span><br /><br /><span>“Alexis Chaise's social media account had only been around a few months as well.</span><br /><br /><span>Fordham pointed out that the first four followers Alexis Chaise’s account gained were three members of the prankster group; Julian Morrow, Craig Reucassel, Dominic Knight and the official account of The Chaser.</span></p> <p><img style="width: 500px; height: 281.25px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7840781/fairy-bread-1.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/a68716843c864761b9f01b1dcbca5cc2" /><br /><br /><span>The fairy bread hoax follows swiftly after Melbourne man Brian Mc launched a petition to change the name of ice-cream Golden Gaytime.</span></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Push to rename iconic Aussie ice cream over "offensive" name

<p>There is increasing amounts of pressure to rename beloved Aussie favourite Golden Gaytime amid concerns it causes offence to the gay community.</p> <p>Australian man, Brian Mc, launched a petition online earlier in the month and has since gone to war with ice-cream giant Streets and its parent company Unilever.</p> <p>The petition has over 800 signatures so far.</p> <p>According to Mr Mc, the name of the ice cream, which was first released in 1959, is "outdated" and "offensive" and is asking for the term "gay" to be banished from the title.</p> <p>“As a part of the LGBTQIA+ community I believe my sexual identity is owned by me, not a brand and that the outdated meaning no longer applies. Isn’t it time for this double entendre to end?” he said in the notes below the petition.</p> <p>Other brands have changed their names in the last year to remove racist connotations. For instance, Redskins became Red Ripper, Chicos became Cheekies and Coon Cheese was renamed Cheer Cheese.</p> <p>Now Mr Mc is calling for Golden Gaytime to receive the same treatment.</p> <p>“Under the law they are seen the same, discrimination means being treated unfairly or not as well as others because of a protected characteristic like age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, race or disability,” he said.</p> <p>“It’s not my place to tell Streets what to call their rebranded product, but I do feel it’s time that the Golden Gaytime is called out for being outdated, especially when Streets is releasing new products and cross promotions in 2021.”</p> <p>Mr Mc revealed he had faced a lot of grief for speaking out about the name but refused to back down.</p> <p>“Just to be a gay man, even in 2021 is still hard … (we) still have a long way to go to be fully accepted as equals, but if we see an area in life that’s not equal, and we are able to change it for the better, why wouldn’t you speak up,” Mr Mc said.</p> <p>“This is why I'm speaking out against Golden Gaytime.</p> <p>“I’m not calling for the product to be cancelled, I’m calling for the product to remove Gay from its name.”</p> <p>A Streets spokesperson told NCA NewsWire that the Golden Gaytime was released in Australia during 1959 when the word “gay” had not yet been applied to gender preference.</p> <p>“The origin of the ‘Gaytime’ name was and remains related to having a joyous or happy time and is meant to capture the pleasure that comes with enjoying an ice cream,” they said in a statement.</p> <p>“The ‘Gaytime’ name is not and never has intended to cause offence and this petition is the first that we have been made aware of.</p> <p>“As a Unilever brand, Streets has a deep and longstanding commitment to help build a more diverse, equitable and inclusive society for all.”</p> <p>Golden Gaytime has a different name in other countries. In New Zealand it is known as a Cookie Crumble.</p> <p>“Gay and Gaytime no longer mean what it used to. Now gay is either ‘I'm gay’, and not as in happy, or ‘that’s so gay’, which is an insult. But either way this ice cream should be called happytime, “ one respondent to the petition said.</p> <p>Unilever has been contacted for comment.</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Real estate agent forced to apologise for offensive, sexist post

<p>A blog post on an Australian real estate website targeting single women buying properties has gone viral for all the wrong reasons.</p> <p>The article titled "Buying as a single lady" was published on Bathurst Real Estate's website and was quickly removed after backlash on social media claimed the post was "sexist" and "misogynistic".</p> <p>The piece started off on a positive note, empowering women who are planning on purchasing a property: “You’re a single lady and you’re content not (to) have a ring on your finger”. But it then took a sharp turn that angered many people online.</p> <p>“You may prefer the emotional and financial back-up of a spouse,” the post reads.</p> <p>The article continues to suggest single women can "go wild when buying" as they are "responsible only for themselves".</p> <p>It also says women “are well known for reasoning with their hearts, not their heads - and many of us love to nest.”</p> <p>Women are then issued a warning, saying property buying can quickly go south “especially if there is no man beside you to offer logic to the situation”.</p> <p>The real estate agency swiftly removed the post from their website and apologised on Facebook.</p> <p>“This is so misogynistic it’s almost comical,” one woman who reposted the article on Facebook wrote.</p> <p>“Thanks so much for this super helpful blog post Bathurst Real Estate! I can’t wait for your next post on ‘Buying as a Single man’, Oh wait...</p> <p>“Next time I go to purchase anything I’ll be sure to bring a man with me to both pay for it and also offer logic, because as you said, women are well known for not using their head and I guess none of us have any money of our own!” the bemused woman continued.</p> <p>“This is the most offensive piece of s**t I have ever read,” another person wrote.</p> <p>“Holy s**t it had never occurred to me that buying a property would represent a big proportion of my hard work and savings! I thought it would be like buying a new eyebrow pencil or baking a cake!” another woman wrote sarcastically.</p> <p>“Does this mean that me and my partner aren’t able to buy a house because we are both women and don’t know how to use our heads?” a user asked.</p> <p>Men also seemed to be equally offended by the article.</p> <p>“I think they need a new password… surely this has got to be a hack from a sacked staff member,” one man suggested.</p> <p>Bathurst Real Estate claimed the post was written by a female from a content marketing agency who was outsourced to create content.</p> <p>The real estate agent apologised for any offence that was caused, claiming the article had gone live without their knowledge and they removed it as soon as they were aware of it.</p>

Real Estate

Placeholder Content Image

Global Times publishes new offensive cartoon as tensions boil

<p><em>The Global Times</em>, a Chinese state-owned newspaper has not relinquished its attacks against Australia as they publish a brutal new graphic.</p> <p>The new tabloid features an Australian Defence Force member holding a sign with the words “human rights” while grinning for a camera – out of frame he is standing on a covered, bloodied body.</p> <p>The cartoon was created by artist Liu Rui and is a reference to the recent war crime allegations that includes the brutal slaying of 39 Afghans.</p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> <p dir="ltr">A perfect picture of hypocrisy/Global Times Cartoon <a href="https://t.co/o64bN19QWr">pic.twitter.com/o64bN19QWr</a></p> — Hu Xijin 胡锡进 (@HuXijin_GT) <a href="https://twitter.com/HuXijin_GT/status/1334158699040960512?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 2, 2020</a></blockquote> <p>The new cartoon is the latest of three and indicates China shows no sign of backing down first in its feud with Australia.</p> <p>It came to a head this week after Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian shared a doctored image on Twitter that depicted an Australian soldier holding a knife to the throat of a young child.</p> <p>On December 1, the newspaper released another cartoon that showed a kangaroo in a suit with a bloodied knife next to it by artist Chen Xia.</p> <p>That article demanded Mr Morrison and the Australian Government “take full responsibility for the deteriorating relationship with China” and claimed “Australia exaggerated and distorted Zhao’s comment and use of cartoon over the crime of Australian troops”, calling it “a false image”.</p> <p>“The country that owes an apology is Australia – to China. And to Afghanistan first and foremost for slaughtering their innocent people,” the editorial wrote defending the first image that Mr Morrison slammed.</p> <p>“It needs to seriously reassess the damage done its own international optics caused by this double standard outburst regarding ‘freedom of speech’ and ‘human rights’.”</p> <p><em>Afghanistan Times Daily</em> editor-in-chief Mansoor Faizy also weighed in on the feud – arguing that the real tragedy was the killing of Afghans being ignored.</p> <p>“A storm of outrage escalated after Chinese officials refused to remove the post, rather than ask Australian officials to apologise to the Afghan people for the unlawful killing of innocent Afghans with inhuman war crimes,” Mr Faizy wrote.</p> <p>“It’s the Australian soldiers who diminished their country’s image by killing helpless Afghan innocents. Asking China to remove the post, or being ashamed of this post, does no good to Australia.</p> <p>“The best thing Canberra can do is to investigate the war crimes in the most transparent way.”</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

"Offensive": Dan Andrews blasted for celebratory photos while families mourn

<p>Premier Daniel Andrews is facing harsh criticism after posted celebratory social media posts, with the families of the virus victims blasting him as “offensive” and a “smart arse”.</p> <p>On Monday, the Premier posted a photo of himself revelling in the state’s first day of zero COVID-19 cases since June and Melbourne’s harsh lockdown coming to an end by eating a doughnut and enjoying a $120 whisky.</p> <blockquote style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/CGzNFRyr4K9/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="12"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <p style="margin: 8px 0 0 0; padding: 0 4px;"><a style="color: #000; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none; word-wrap: break-word;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CGzNFRyr4K9/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank">Said I'd go a little higher up the shelf. Here's to you, Victoria.</a></p> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;">A post shared by <a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/danielandrewsmp/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank"> Dan Andrews</a> (@danielandrewsmp) on Oct 26, 2020 at 1:29am PDT</p> </div> </blockquote> <p>But not everyone shared the same sentiment, with many pointing out the families of the 800 people who died in the state’s second wave didn’t have anything to celebrate.</p> <p>Sebastian Agnello, whose mother died from coronavirus, told the Herald Sun that Andrews was “totally responsible” for the second wave getting out of hand.</p> <blockquote style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/CGzIzAVLUnL/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="12"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <p style="margin: 8px 0 0 0; padding: 0 4px;"><a style="color: #000; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none; word-wrap: break-word;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CGzIzAVLUnL/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank">Today's a good day.</a></p> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;">A post shared by <a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/danielandrewsmp/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank"> Dan Andrews</a> (@danielandrewsmp) on Oct 26, 2020 at 12:51am PDT</p> </div> </blockquote> <p>“If he is patting himself on the back with the doughnuts; that is a person who has lost the plot in the sense of what he’s actually caused and the deaths that came from it,” he said.</p> <p>Melbourne businessman Frank Micallef, who lost both his parents to the virus, said the premier should be “begging for forgiveness” from Victorians and found his celebratory tweets “offensive on a number of fronts”.</p> <p>Victoria recorded two new COVID-19 cases and two deaths on Wednesday.</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

"Offensive and wrong in every way": Gladys fires up over ICAC questions

<div class="post_body_wrapper"> <div class="post_body"> <div class="body_text redactor-styles redactor-in"> <p>NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian was hammered in the NSW parliament with questioning over her involvement with an MP under a corruption inquiry.</p> <p>Labor leader Jodi McKay tried to bait the Premier into admitting she should be considered a "sounding board for corruption".</p> <p>“The question is offensive and wrong in every way,” the Premier replied forcefully.</p> <p>McKay asked the Premier why she didn't report her knowledge of her ex-partner Daryl Maguire trying to clear a debt through a land deal at Badgerys Creek.</p> <p>“I refer again to this question, which is wrong, and highly offensive, and I say to the leader of the opposition, either withdraw it, or say it outside,” the Premier said, pointing to the hallway.</p> <p>McKay tried again with statements the Premier had made to ICAC.</p> <p>“You said you didn’t know Iwan Sunito – but you did. You said you didn’t know what UWE (United World Enterprises) was – but you did. You said you didn’t know your office was used to lobby property developers – but you did. You said you didn’t know Daryl Maguire stood to profit from a property deal he was lobbying for – but you did,” Ms McKay said.</p> <p>“How can the people of NSW trust you?”</p> <p>The Premier fired back: “I don’t know why she’s asked me the question, because she’s asked me the question and answered herself. She already has the answer, so I don’t know why she asked me.</p> <p>“The opposition can clutch at any straws they like. The truth is I have done nothing wrong, and the people of NSW know it.”</p> <p>Helen Dalton, a member from the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party said that the Premier lied to ICAC when she said that she didn't know what United World Enterprises was.</p> <p>In Monday's testimony, the Premier was asked about UWE, which is a company her former partner Daryl Macguire had financial ties to.</p> <p>“I remember asking you what the UWE was, because I didn’t know what it was, and I didn’t remember what it was, yep,” the Premier told the ICAC.</p> <p>However, the question drew a harsh response from the Premier.</p> <p>“Can I say that I provided assistance as a witness on Monday in great detail. I was forthright, direct, much to my personal detriment but I had to do it because it is in the public interest,” Ms Berejiklian shouted.</p> <p>“And I say to the people of NSW that every day that I have been in this place, since 2003 I‘ve worked hard. I’ve worked my guts out to the people; I will continue to do that.</p> <p>“I never have and never will do anything wrong but I will work my guts out for the people of this great state!”</p> <p>The Question Time arguments came after Berejiklian survived two separate votes of no confidence on Wednesday, both in the upper and lower houses of NSW Parliament.</p> </div> </div> </div>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Victoria police ramps up offensive against protests

<p>There’s something very disturbing about scenes from the anti-lockdown protest at the Queen Victoria Market in Melbourne over the weekend.</p> <p>There’s a series of video footage posted online which shows scores of heavily armed and riot squad police far outnumbering protestors standing around, or sitting, or shopping, and many are chanting: chanting “peace and love” and “freedom”.</p> <p>And yet, 74 people were arrested and $280,000 in fines were handed out to those caught breaching lockdown restrictions. In one video, three police officers tackle a protestor, <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-09-13/victoria-coronavirus-anti-lockdown-protest-arrests-melbourne/12659410">and an officer can be clearly seen kneeling on the man’s neck</a> while he is face down, being handcuffed.</p> <p>The protest’s leader is now also facing an <a href="https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/police-arrest-pregnant-woman-over-social-media-post/">incitement charge</a> as police prepare a search warrant for his home in Burwood East.</p> <p>Who is ‘policing’ the police?</p> <p>In the wake of the protest, Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews praised the work of police ‘who did a good job in very difficult circumstances.’ He also added that: ‘protesting is stupid and dangerous and those who do it will be dealt with.’</p> <p>It’s a worrying sign of the erosion of democracy when the state’s Premier fails to see the one thing that is pretty clear to most other Australians: Melbournians are tired of the lockdowns, the heavy police presence around their city and the fact that people’s movements are being monitored 24/7, all of which show no signs of abating.</p> <p>And, before Covid-19, and before the states implemented strict public health laws to mandate public gatherings and individual social distancing, protesting was a perfectly normal way for Australians to express their views.</p> <p>But now, of course, that right is denied. In Melbourne public gatherings are strictly forbidden and people are confined to their homes except for one hour a day when they can travel for limited purposes and only within 5 kilometres from home without an exemption.</p> <p>A number of checkpoints are in operation around the metropolitan areas, and police are using number plate recognition technology to detect vehicles registered to ‘stage four’ areas.</p> <p>Police abusing their powers</p> <p>Many Australians are also starting to be very concerned that the extra powers afforded to police under Covid-19 public health enforcement laws have allowed them too much leeway to be able to ‘bend’ some of the rules of otherwise ‘normal’ policing. For example, that ‘<a href="https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/recent-changes-to-police-powers-in-nsw/">arrest should be a measure of last resort</a>.’</p> <p>A Victoria police spokesman said many of the weekend lockdown protesters were aggressive and threatened violence towards officers, with one <a href="https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/criminal/offences/assault/assault-police/">charged with assaulting a police officer in execution of their duty</a>.</p> <p>But much of the <a href="https://twitter.com/7NewsMelbourne/status/1304973920437641217">video footage refutes that statement.</a> While a handful of protestors were agitated, and some threw fruit, by and large the crowd seemed compliant, although some did shout: “This is not a police state” and “you’ve got to be on the right side of history”.</p> <p>The ‘threatened violence towards officers’ is a cry that we often hear from police, and sometimes a difficult one to prove, despite the fact that there is a constant stream of video footage, not just from the weekend protests but of <a href="https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/police-officer-chokes-and-trips-woman-who-is-not-wearing-a-mask/">various incidents in recent times</a> in which clearly, police after often the ones using unnecessary force.</p> <p>Woman ‘dragged from her car’</p> <p>In fact, the weekend protests in Melbourne were sparked by video footage posted on social media by a Victorian woman, Natalie Bonnet, who was dragged from her car by police for not stating her name at a vehicle checkpoint. She had been stopped for allegedly not having a legal phone charging device mounted to her car.</p> <p>In the video – <a href="https://www.facebook.com/817678571/posts/10160115606228572/?extid=LykdgdNsQXbvpNH8&amp;d=n">which has been shared thousands of times online </a>–  she tells the police officer she is ‘scared’ to leave her vehicle because he is armed. Following this, the police officer reaches over her, unbuckles her seatbelt and manhandles her, pulling her out of the vehicle.</p> <p>She alleges four officers had their knees in her back and she couldn’t breathe as they handcuffed her.</p> <p>It’s understood she will face charges including: driving with obscured vision, failing to produce a licence, failing to state her name and address, resisting arrest, assaulting police and offensive language.</p> <p>As tensions escalate between police and the general public, there’s also a growing sense of mistrust in the police force, particularly in Victoria, but it’s not isolated to the state, and it’s it only further perpetuated by these incidents in which people are intimidated and manhandled. There is no doubt that being the victim of such behaviour can have lasting detrimental emotional effects.</p> <p><em>Written by Sonia Hickey. Republished with permission <a href="https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/victoria-police-ramps-up-offensive-against-protests/">of Sydney Criminal Lawyers. </a></em></p>

Travel Tips

Placeholder Content Image

“The word is horrid”: Calls for popular cheese to be renamed

<p><span>There’s a renewed call to rename one of Australia’s best known cheese brands because its name is deemed offensive.</span></p> <p><span>Comedian Josh Thomas took to Twitter to post an image of Coon cheese with the caption “are we still chill with this?”</span></p> <p><span>He then explained that the word was widely considered to be “hate speech” and was used to belittle Indigenous Australians.</span></p> <p><span>Thomas believes removing the Coon name would be a small change and would “communicate that we see them, understand their pain and respect them”.</span></p> <p><span>Many followers agreed with renaming the dairy brand.</span></p> <p><span>“I always feel a bit uncomfortable with this name and if it makes me feel weird then I imagine it must be worse for an Indigenous person. Would it really matter if we changed the name?” said one.</span></p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> <p dir="ltr">Hey Australia - are we still chill with this? <a href="https://t.co/3pY2wyZ3IY">pic.twitter.com/3pY2wyZ3IY</a></p> — Josh Thomas (@JoshThomas87) <a href="https://twitter.com/JoshThomas87/status/1271972388255576064?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 14, 2020</a></blockquote> <p><span>But many also disagreed, saying the change was unnecessary.</span></p> <p><span>“100 per cent chill. It's a non-issue,” said one.</span></p> <p><span>“I feel like you’re just stirring the pot now. It was named after the guy who made it. Taking the cheese off the shelf won’t stop the racist attitudes that people in this country have. It also won’t take back any of the racial history here either,” said another</span></p> <p><span>According to Coon’s website, the brand was first established in 1935 and “recognises the work of an American, Edward William Coon, who patented a unique ripening process that was used to manufacture the original cheese”.</span></p> <p><span>But Thomas wasn’t phased by those pointing out the brand’s history, saying the focus should instead be on the name’s potential to offend.</span></p> <p><span>“It’s amazing the respect people have for the name of a man who invented a processing technique of cheese – who died in 1934. And the disrespect they have for black people,” Thomas wrote.</span></p> <p><span>“I honestly wasn’t expecting so many of my followers to defend a word that is widely considered hate speech. I honestly thought my followers were anti-racist and compassionate.</span></p> <p><span>“Like, even if you DGAF (sic) about the Aboriginal Australians who have been called this – and the pain the word represents. Surely you can see it makes Australians look silly to the rest of the world?”</span></p> <p><span>A number of Aboriginal Australians, who also commented on Twitter, backed up Thomas’ view that the cheese brand should be renamed.</span></p> <p><span>“I’m Indigenous and absolutely hate that word,” said one.</span></p> <p><span>Another follower added, “the amount of times I was called that (name) was insane … The word is horrid”.</span></p>

Food & Wine

Placeholder Content Image

Cemetery removes headstone over “offensive” picture

<p>A petition has been launched against a memorial park in Adelaide following the removal of an “offensive” headstone.</p> <p>Arthur Bridge’s son Peter Robert Bridge died in April last year at 33 following a lifelong battle with cystic fibrosis.</p> <p>Arthur said his family wanted to celebrate Peter’s “wicked sense of humour” by including a small picture of him sticking up his middle finger on his headstone at the Enfield Memorial Park.</p> <p>“Pete would have loved it because that was who he was,” Arthur told <em><a href="https://www.9news.com.au/national/adelaide-cemetery-grieving-family-outraged-after-offensive-headstone-removed/0037fe17-58a2-4eb8-8927-106a80f6fb13">9News</a></em>. “He would be driving along and he would see a mate and the finger would be up to them, just joking around.”</p> <p>The headstone was removed in January, months after it was installed.</p> <p>Arthur said the cemetery found the photo “offensive” and removed the headstone without contacting him or his family.</p> <p>“Apparently someone had complained. But the photo is so small, you would have to be standing pretty much on top of it to see what it is,” he said.</p> <p>“They know where I live, I’m only five minutes up the road. They could have popped a letter in my letterbox.</p> <p>“It’s morally wrong, there is just nothing right about it. You don’t do that.”</p> <p>More than 2,600 people have signed <a href="https://www.change.org/p/enfield-memorial-petition-against-enfield-memorial-for-removing-our-sons-headstone">a petition</a> set up by Arthur to protest the removal.</p> <p>The Adelaide Cemeteries Authority told <em><a href="https://7news.com.au/entertainment/viral-weird/beloved-sons-cheeky-gravestone-removed-from-adelaide-cemetery-for-being-offensive-c-707896">7News</a></em> it has made numerous attempts to notify the Bridge family prior to the removal.</p> <p>“Adelaide Cemeteries has since met with the Bridge family on a number of occasions to try to resolve the issue,” said chief operations officer Michael Robertson.</p> <p>“Adelaide Cemeteries remains prepared to work with the Bridge family to find a solution.”</p>

Retirement Life

Placeholder Content Image

Cruise line targets “offensive” clothing for passengers

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Carnival Cruise Lines are issuing a new ban on clothing that might be considered “offensive”. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The announcement made in late 2019 has sparked a heated debate on whether regulating clothing worn infringes on “free speech rights” or if it is even enforceable. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Carnival's brand ambassador and senior cruise director, John Heald, released details about the addition to Carnival's dress code on his popular Facebook page, revealing it was added to the FAQ section of Carnival's website "in the past few days."</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The section reads: "All guests are expected to ensure their clothing and accessories are respectful to fellow guests. Specifically, items worn during the cruise should not contain any message that may be considered offensive or contain nudity, profanity, sexual innuendo/suggestions. In addition, clothing/accessories should not promote negative ethnic or racial commentary, or hatred or violence in any form."</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Carnival spokesman Vance Gulliksen said the change to clothing regulations came "after some incidents were reported in the media about other travel sectors where customers were wearing clothing with very threatening messages."</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The reports "started a discussion about how we were prepared to handle such a situation and the need for clarification to both guests and crew."</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Carnival spokesman Gulliksen said that while the line’s crew members are "not onboard to be the clothing or expression police," staff members will still go out of their way to "look out for guests wearing clothes with inappropriate images or language and ask them to change as needed.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">"We will evaluate situations on a case-by-case basis and take appropriate steps as necessary."</span></p>

Cruising

Placeholder Content Image

ANZAC disgrace: Man charged with "offensive act" at war memorial

<p>A man who allegedly relieved himself on the ANZAC memorial in Sydney’s CBD has been charged.</p> <p>The 23-year-old man was grabbed by officers after allegedly urinating on the western corner of the memorial building in Hyde Park. This occurred just before 11 pm on Thursday.</p> <p>He is due to face the Downing Centre Local Court on January 22 after being charged with committing an offensive act in or on a war memorial.</p> <blockquote style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/BTSML4-DPY6/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="12"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <p style="margin: 8px 0 0 0; padding: 0 4px;"><a style="color: #000; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none; word-wrap: break-word;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/BTSML4-DPY6/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank">Today we remember the brave men and women who have served our country. Lest we forget. Pic: @zxlee618</a></p> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;">A post shared by <a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/cityofsydney/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank"> City of Sydney</a> (@cityofsydney) on Apr 24, 2017 at 3:05pm PDT</p> </div> </blockquote> <p>Police say that he is the second man to be arrested for that specific offence this month, as a French tourist was allegedly caught doing the same thing on December 10.</p> <p>The 22-year-old man was walking through Hyde Park at around 10 pm when he stopped to relieve himself on the building.</p> <p>He was arrested by officers as well and charged with committing an offensive act in or on a war memorial or internment site.</p> <p>The man was granted conditional bail and is due to appear at Downing Centre Local Court on January 15th .</p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Kmart strips "offensive" child costume from shelves after mum launches damaging petition

<p>Kmart has stripped a children’s bride costume from its shelves after a Melbourne mother launched a scathing petition, calling the item “beyond inappropriate”. </p> <p>The costume could have been purchased for $6 and included a white wedding gown and headband with a veil for children between the ages of 4 and 6 - before it was pulled from sale on Tuesday afternoon. </p> <p>The move came two days after Melbourne mum, Shannon B launched the petition on<span> </span><em><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.change.org/" target="_blank">Change.org. </a></em></p> <p>“Kmart Australia regrets the decision to range the bride costume,” a Kmart spokesperson told<span> </span><em><a rel="noopener" href="https://7news.com.au/business/retail/kmart-stops-selling-childrens-bride-costumes-after-mums-petition-c-517062" target="_blank">7 News</a>.</em></p> <p>“It was not intended to cause offence and we sincerely apologise. We have made the decision to withdraw this product.”</p> <p><img style="width: 0px; height: 0px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7831965/kmart-bride.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/dae2d4cd79fa44babf7389a58308b6e5" /></p> <p>The petition, which had 124 signatures, labelled the costume “offensive” and asked supporters to remind Kmart it had a “social responsibility” to uphold.</p> <p>“Each year, 12 million children (girls as young as 6 years old — the same size as this ‘costume’) are sold or married off by their family without their consent. That’s one million child marriages per month!” Shannon wrote.</p> <p>“That equates to 23 children every minute or 1 child every 2 minutes. If this continues, 150 million more children will be married by the year 2030.</p> <p>“Child marriage means child abuse and torture in its worst forms — paedophilia, child rape, child slavery, child sex trafficking.</p> <p>“Tell Kmart this is beyond inappropriate and offensive and that they have a social responsibility to pull this item off their shelves immediately.”</p> <p>World Vision Australia confirmed the statistics shared were indeed correct. </p> <p>“Anything that trivialises child marriage is disturbing” child rights campaigner Mercy Chipo Jumo said.</p> <p>The big decision comes a week before Halloween, where children’s costumes will be sure to fly off department store racks.</p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

BBC issues apology to Prince Harry over “seriously offensive” neo-Nazi image

<p>The BBC has issued an apology to Prince Harry after they published a confronting image of him from a neo-Nazi social media group without warning.</p> <p>The news outlet came under fire after they released an image showing the royal with a gun to his head, with text calling him a “race traitor”. Shortly after, a complaint was lodged amid safety concerns for the royal family.</p> <p>Speaking to<span> </span><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.theguardian.com/au" target="_blank"><em>The Guardian</em></a>, a spokesperson raised “serious security concerns” for the Duke and “caused his family great distress specifically while his wife was nearly five months pregnant”.</p> <p>The image was shared on a far-right platform, and showed blood splattered over the father-of-one. The creator placed a swastika over the 35-year-old and captioned it: “See ya later race traitor. #racetraitor.”</p> <p>The BBC originally rejected the complaint, justifying the use of the image as public interest. But they’ve now changed their tune, issuing an apology for failing to warn the Duke and Duchess of Sussex before the report was published.</p> <p>The media corporation said it should have considered the impact of publishing “seriously offensive material”.</p> <p>“We need to be vigilant in balancing the impact on individuals against the wider good which may be served by publication,” read the statement.</p> <p>Addressing a letter to Harry, the BBC said it was working to strengthen its guidance on the use of possibly offensive content.</p> <p>Harry’s spokesperson responded: “His Royal Highness welcomes the letter from the BBC relation to the shocking image published by<span> </span><em>BBC News</em><span> </span>last year as part of a report on the activities of a British new-Nazi group with links in the US.</p> <p>“His Royal Highness raised the issue with Ofcom about the rebroadcasting of this racist image due to his concerns that hateful and dangerous propaganda had been spread globally by the world’s most important public service broadcaster. Due to the credibility of the BBC, their choice to publicise this material created an open door for all other media to reproduce it.”</p> <p>The statement then went on to say that Harry was completely against the decision of the image being published in the first place.</p>

News

Our Partners