Placeholder Content Image

Mum's list of chores for babysitter divides internet

<p>An American mum and schoolteacher has divided social media after she shared a list of chores that her 17-year-old babysitter could do for extra cash. </p> <p>Katrina Ivan hired a former student, who is now a senior in high school, to babysit her two-year-old son.</p> <p>The busy mum, who had been struggling to maintain her home, left an optional list of chores the babysitter could do for some extra cash. </p> <p>“You are more than welcome to hang out and watch TV but if you want to earn some extra cash these are up for grabs,” the note read.</p> <p>She claimed that her son was already asleep when the babysitter arrived at 7:30pm and she would be looking after him until 11:30pm.</p> <p>The babysitter was being paid $115.45 for the four hours of work.</p> <p>The extra chores included organising the kitchen island, which would earn the student $15, as would cleaning the windows and mirrors in the house and sweeping and mopping the kitchen floor.</p> <p>Cleaning out the fridge would earn the her $23, while vacuuming the couch would earn her $4.</p> <p>A few other optional chores included re-organising the toys, organising the kitchen island, and re-organising the silverware, which were all chores that would earn the student $15. </p> <p>The babysitter earned an extra $92 for the chores she chose, and a few social media users have said that this was a great idea. </p> <p> “I wish they did this when I was a babysitter. Would have loved the opportunity to earn extra," one wrote.</p> <p>“This is a great idea!! Sometimes it’s boring to just to sit and watch TV, this makes time go by quicker and sometimes it’s things I would do to help," another said. </p> <p>“I think since it’s optional or not you can give whatever amounts. It’s still the babysitters choice whether to do it or not,” a third added. </p> <p>However a few others weren't as impressed. </p> <p>“Those are 1990 prices,” one social media user wrote. </p> <p>“$23 for the fridge that’s wild," another added. </p> <p>“I think if you mention it ahead of time ‘oh I left a chore list if you’re interested in any of them it’s extra cash for you!’ Because if I just arrived to this note I might be a little uncomfortable,” a third said. </p> <p><em>Images: TikTok</em></p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

Mum's list of insane babysitter requirements sparks debate

<p>A man on TikTok has clapped back at a very strange babysitter's list of requirements, posted by a mother in a local bulletin.</p> <p>In a video shared to social media, Collins O aka @thatboycollins revealed the list and pointed out how extreme and unrealistic the requirements really are. *</p> <p>"Babysitter needed ASAP," the ad read. "I need someone to look after my four kids (aged two, three, five and seven) from noon to 6 pm Monday to Friday.”</p> <p>The prerequisites laid out by the mother require applicants to "be a great cook and avid cleaner", "be over 25-years-old" and have a minimum education of a "master's degree”.</p> <blockquote class="tiktok-embed" style="max-width: 605px; min-width: 325px;" cite="https://www.tiktok.com/@thatboycollins/video/7154155085965495598" data-video-id="7154155085965495598"> <section><a title="@thatboycollins" href="https://www.tiktok.com/@thatboycollins?refer=embed" target="_blank" rel="noopener">@thatboycollins</a></p> <p>Why did Tiktok take this down..😂</p> <p><a title="♬ original sound - Collins O" href="https://www.tiktok.com/music/original-sound-7154155088645212971?refer=embed" target="_blank" rel="noopener">♬ original sound - Collins O</a></section> </blockquote> <p>The requirements became more restrictive as the list went on, saying that applicants couldn't have "social media accounts", adding "I don't need my kids seeing that". It also stated "no drinking, no smoking, not even vaping!" and "no tattoos or piercings.”</p> <p>In order to get the job, applicants needed to have "five professional references" and stated that a "background check and drug test [would] be carried out."</p> <p>Collins was blown away by the audacity of the mum, and so were viewers. It was then revealed that the job only pays a shocking $200 per WEEK.</p> <p>At the bottom of the page, a sentence prompted applicants to contact 'Tammy' to apply for the job.</p> <p>"Tammy, with all due disrespect, go to hell," Collins joked. Amassing a huge 300,000 views, it seems the audience agreed with him too.</p> <p><em>Images: TikTok</em></p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

Chris Dawson's former mistress reveals last words with Lynette

<p>The former babysitter, who became Chris Dawson's mistress and then his wife, has taken the stand at his murder trial.</p> <p>Chris Dawson is on trial for murder as the prosecution alleges he murdered his wife Lynette in 1982. </p> <p>The woman, who has been known only as JC throughout the high-profile trial, first met Dawson in 1980 when he was her Year 11 sports teacher at Cromer High School.</p> <p>"He told me he had seen me in the playground... when I was 15 and decided he would like to get to know me better because I was attractive to him... I believe he deliberately tried to take my class," JC told the court.</p> <p>The Supreme Court was shown a series of cards and love letters that JC said were dropped in her school bag by Dawson.</p> <p>She claimed he signed off as "GOD" to disguise himself because she was a minor. </p> <p>By 1981, the teenager had moved in with Dawson, his wife Lynette, and their two children at Bayview to work as their live-in babysitter.</p> <p>"Lynette was very welcoming... He used to call her "fatso" and laugh about it," JC told the court.</p> <p>She claimed when Lynette went to bed, "Chris Dawson would want me to have sex with him".</p> <p>The court heard what JC says is her last conversation with Lynette before she vanished in 1982.</p> <p>JC claims Lynette asked her, "you've been taking liberties with my husband?"</p> <p>Dawson claims Lynette ran away from the family home in 1982 after she discovered her husband's affair with JC, and denies any claims he killed his wife. </p> <p>Dawson and JC went on to marry and have a child before they separated in 1990.</p> <p>The trial is still ongoing. </p> <p><em>Image credits: Nine News</em></p>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Court hears Chris Dawson was "always angry" in damning letter

<p>During the highly publicised trial of Chris Dawson, the court has been told that Lynette Dawson told her sister that her husband Chris was “angry with her all the time” and thought he needed to see a doctor.</p> <p>Chris Dawson is standing trial in the NSW Supreme Court over the alleged murder of Lynette, four decades after her disappearance from Sydney's Northern Beaches.</p> <p>The former teacher and rugby league player has pleaded not guilty, denying killing her and disposing of her body.</p> <p>Mr Dawson's defence have claimed that he had no reason to want her to disappear and have denied allegations that he wanted to hire a hitman.</p> <p>On the second day of evidence, Ms Dawson’s sister Patricia Jenkins told the court she last spoke to Ms Dawson in early January 1982, just weeks before her disappearance. </p> <p>The court was told the Mr Dawson developed a sexual relationship with one of his students, who later moved into the Dawson's home as a babysitter.</p> <p>Just before Christmas in 1981, Mr Dawson left his home with the girl, who can only be known as JC for legal reasons, leaving Lynette with her two young children.</p> <p>However, he retuned several days later. </p> <p>Ms Jenkins told the court that Ms Dawson found out about Mr Dawson leaving when she arrived home to find his clothes and pillow gone and a note on the bed.</p> <p>“Don’t paint too dark a picture of me to the girls,” the note read, Ms Jenkins said.</p> <p>Ms Jenkins said when she spoke to her sister prior to Christmas in 1981, Ms Dawson had expressed concern about Mr Dawson’s health because she thought he was often “angry”.</p> <p>“She said to me he was always so angry with her all the time,” Ms Jenkins said.</p> <p>“Her descriptive words were ‘his black eyes flashing’. And she thought he needed to go see a doctor to see if it was some physical cause that he would react to her in such an angry way.”</p> <p><em>Image credits: Nine News</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Aussie babysitter charged with 194 sex offences

<p>Jareth Harries-Markham, a 23-year-old man from Western Australia, has been charged with 194 sex offences involving a dozen children he molested when he was working as a childminder.</p> <p>Police say Harries-Markham advertised his services online on a site and then allegedly sexually assaulted his victims while babysitting them.</p> <p>The alleged victims are aged between eight months and nine years old, and are said to have happened between July last year and August this year.</p> <p>Harries-Markham was arrested in August and initially charged with 14 offences, but in a Perth Magistrate’s Court on Monday, it was revealed he is now facing a total of 194 charges relating to nine separate alleged victims.</p> <p><strong>Charges include possessing prohibited weapons</strong></p> <p>These charges include the sexual penetration of a child under 13, indecently dealing with a child under 13, possessing and producing child exploitation material, and possessing prohibited and controlled weapons.</p> <p>The 23-year-old appeared in court via video link but only spoke to confirm his name.</p> <p>Harries-Markham advertised his services on WeNeedANanny.com, describing himself as someone who loved “helping bring up kids to be the best they can be”.</p> <p>He said he had four years’ experience in babysitting, a ‘Working With Children’ check, a police check and a certificate in first aid.</p> <p>‘I’m a pretty easy-going guy who is open to care for any age any hours,’ he wrote on the website.</p> <p>‘Open to handling things anyway the family wants,’ he added.</p> <p>Harries-Markham will be back in court again on October 18.</p> <p><em>Image: 7News</em></p> <p><em> </em></p> <p><em> </em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Babysitter charged with murder of baby 35 years later

<p>In 1985, Terry McKirchy was given a light sentence of attempted murder for shaking five-month-old Benjamin Dowling so severely, he suffered permanent brain damage.</p> <p>But the baby never recovered from his injuries and lived his entire life with severe disabilities. He was never able to communicate, needed metal rods inserted near his spine to keep him upright and used a feeding tube to eat.</p> <p>In 2019, a medical examiner from Florida said Dowling finally succumbed to his injuries and died, aged 35.</p> <p>At the time of the incident, McKirchy, 59, told his parents Dowling had fallen off the couch, according to Fox News. The baby was rushed to hospital and diagnosed with shaken infant syndrome.</p> <p>When his mother, Rae, saw him on the night he suffered his injuries, she told police her boy's hands "were clenched and he was turning blue," according to the South Florida Sun-Sentinel.</p> <p>Ms Dowling and her husband, Joe, said their first son never progressed past a five-month-old after suffering his injuries and continued to depend on his family and others for support all his life.</p> <p>The couple said in a statement: “Benjamin never crawled, fully rolled over, walked, never talked, never fed himself, he never enjoyed a hamburger or an ice cream cone, he could never tell us when he had an itch or anything hurt."</p> <p>“When he cried in pain, we as a family and caregivers had to guess as to what was wrong and hope that we could satisfy his need,” they added.</p> <p>The babysitter spent weekends in jail as part of her sentence but a Broward County Grand jury recently indicted McKirchy as guilty of first-degree murder and she is now jailed near her home in Sugar Land, Texas, pending her return to Florida.</p> <p>Confusion as to why McKirchy wasn't charged with a harsher sentence at the time centres around the fact she was pregnant at the time. David Weinstein, a Miami defence lawyer and former prosecutor who's not involved in the case, said perhaps witnesses were not available or the available medical evidence was not strong.</p> <p>Now the homicide case appears stronger because the medical and scientific evidence has progressed. As prosecutors said in a statement: “The passage of time between the injuries sustained and the death of the victim were considered by the forensic experts who conducted the autopsy and ruled the death was directly caused by the injuries from 1984."</p> <p>“This case was presented to the grand jury, which determined that this was a homicide.”</p> <p>Mr Dowling’s parents said their son “would never know how much he was loved and could never tell others of his love for them.”</p> <p>“Benjamin did smile when he was around his family, although he could never verbalise anything, we believe he knew who we were and that we were working hard to help him,” they said.</p> <p><em><strong>Image credit: AAP</strong></em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Mother sacks babysitter over disturbing nanny cam footage

<p>A mother has not been able to hold back her disgust after sacking her nanny.</p> <p>The mum said that she was shocked to discover that the nanny she hired to look after her 10-month-old son and five-year-old daughter had secretly been breastfeeding the son. </p> <p>The nanny started attempting to nurse the baby after the mother had confided in her about her issues with breastfeeding.</p> <p>“During a conversation that we had recently (maybe two weeks ago), I mentioned that I don’t produce much milk which forces me to rely on donor milk to feed my son,” the mum confessed <a rel="noopener" href="https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/hnm9j2/wibta_if_i_fired_my_nanny_for_breastfeeding_my_son/" target="_blank" class="_e75a791d-denali-editor-page-rtflink">in the Reddit post</a>.</p> <p>“She was very sympathetic and inquisitive about the situation, and I was happy to answer all of her questions while simultaneously thinking nothing of it.”</p> <p>It was only after the mother checked the nanny cams that were set up in the house that she made the discovery.</p> <p>“I have nanny cameras set up in the living room and in my bedroom that my husband and I can access at anytime when we’re not home, but I never feel compelled to check for the simple fact that I trust my nanny,” she explained.</p> <p>“However, I was having a rough day yesterday and wanted to see what the little ones were up to so I decided to pop in. My nanny was sitting on my bed, rocking my son, and attempting to breastfeed him.</p> <p>“I almost felt sick, it just seemed so inappropriate. I decided to wait until I got home to confront her about it, and when I asked she was incredibly apologetic. She said she wanted to help me because of my milk production issues and never meant any harm.”</p> <p>The mother initially accepted the apology, but became suspicious and went through old footage.</p> <p>To her horror, she discovered that the nanny breastfeeding her son wasn't a one-off occurrence. </p> <p>“She unplugs the camera in my bedroom when she goes to put him down for naps and plugs it back in when she leaves,” she added.</p> <p>“After reviewing our recordings this wasn’t the first time she attempted to breastfeed my son, among a few other questionable things (closing my daughter in the pantry, leaving my son in the backyard unattended, etc).”</p> <p>If that's not bad enough, the mother also discovered that some treasured baby items were missing. </p> <p>“A couple of my son’s first outfits (first onesie, first Halloween costume) were gone as well as a small blanket that belonged to my daughter, and a box of old baby clothes I was going to donate,” she added.</p> <p>“These were returned to me by [the nanny’s] father minus the blanket because she can’t find it.”</p> <p>The mother said she’s been left "heartbroken" by the incident.</p> <p>“We’ve decided to let her go, obviously, and I’m going to be taking a few weeks of leave to take my kids in for check-ups,” she added.</p> <p>“My husband and I are horrified and heartbroken that we facilitated a situation in which our children’s safety was put at risk.”</p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

Mother posts “delusional” list of babysitter requirements

<p>An anonymous mother has posted on Facebook looking for a babysitter for her three children. Although that might seem harmless on its own, the list of requirements was what had people confused.</p> <p>Some requirements included being a Trump fan to at least having nine years of experience working with children, according to the screenshot on <em><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ChoosingBeggars/comments/a2664j/delusional_babysitter_requirements/" target="_blank">Reddit</a></em>.</p> <p>Although political preferences aren’t usually asked while looking for a babysitter, many were optimistic until they read further on for the unknown mother’s demands.</p> <p>According to her, candidates must have full availability, including weekends, and must show up for “emergency last-minute calls”. You also are required to have “perfect attendance”, as 100 per cent is required.</p> <p>It also helps if you’re a native English speaker but know a second language so you can teach her children while you’re looking after them.</p> <p>The best part for many was the price, as the mother was offering $10/hr in cash. According to her, “it’s like making $15/hr normally but without paying tax”.</p> <p><img style="width: 281.1094452773614px; height:500px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7832907/6jfd7f801q121-1.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/ea3bc3e8e8db4b2cbcc163cd50792ffb" /></p> <p>Others were quick to comment, saying that they’d be worried about a babysitter with nine years of experience working for $10 an hour.</p> <p>“Would be worried about someone who had the degree and/or experience but was still willing to graft for $10 an hour,” they wrote.</p> <p>Another said that it was unfair that the babysitter would have to pay for snacks.</p> <p>“I thought she meant SHE'D be willing to pay for the babysitters snacks. I was like well I guess that's nice, then I realized she meant the babysitters would be paying for snacks. Lovely,” they said.</p> <p>One shared what their babysitting experience would be like if they were paid $10/hour.</p> <p>“For $10/hr I will come over to watch your TV and eat your snacks. Expect to return to alive children.... that's it.”</p>

Home & Garden

Placeholder Content Image

Mum goes viral over controversial babysitter job ad

<p>An anonymous mother is receiving a wave of criticism after posting a lengthy job ad for a babysitter.</p> <p>The post, which was originally shared on Facebook, reveals the woman’s specific demands for the chosen candidate of the $10-an-hour role.</p> <p>The US-based woman is on the hunt to hire a babysitter who is also a Trump fan, has no tattoos and is willing to pay for some snacks for her three young children.</p> <p>“Looking for a babysitter in the area. PM me if you’re interested. Here are the requirements,” she wrote on social media.</p> <p>The list stipulated: </p> <p><em>1. Have a Bachelor’s Degree in Childcare or 9 years of relevant babysitting experience</em></p> <p><em>2. 3 good references with phone numbers</em></p> <p><em>3. Full time availability including weekends</em></p> <p><em>4. Your own car and driving license</em></p> <p><em>5. Native English speaking and preferred second language to teach to my children</em></p> <p><em>6. CPR certified, ideally a CAN license</em></p> <p><em>7. NO history of traffic tickets and NO problems with the law. (I will be running your name through databases)</em></p> <p><em>8. No tattoos. No drugs. No alcohol. No sketchy social media behaviour AND/OR public pictures</em></p> <p><em>9. MUST be okay with my two Pit Bulls</em></p> <p><em>10. MUST be okay with emergency last minute calls</em></p> <p><em>11. Perfect attendance 100% required</em></p> <p><em>12. Willing to pay for some snacks</em></p> <p><em>13. Will love to work with an infant, 3-year-old and 5-year-old</em></p> <p><em>14. Ideally will be a Trump fan</em></p> <p><em>In exchange, I will be offering $10/hr under the table cash. It’s like making $15/hr normally without paying tax. Serious inquiries ONLY.</em></p> <p>The mother-of-three’s job ad was later shared to Reddit, where it received hundreds of comments from people who were dumbfounded by her requirements.</p> <p>One person wrote: “I thought she meant SHE'D be willing to pay for the babysitter snacks. I was like well I guess that's nice, then I realised she meant the babysitters would be paying for the snacks. Lovely.”</p> <p>Another added: “9 years experience is very specific! Also, would be worried about someone who had the degree and/or experience but was still willing to graft for $10 an hour.”</p> <p>One user said that a job with so many requirements should result in extra benefits for the chosen candidate.</p> <p>“A friend of mine did this and one of the requirements was also having a degree at an Ivy League (she did). She was able to stay at their summer home whenever and got to go to Paris Fashion Week. This lady is nuts though.”</p> <p>“For $10/hr I will come over to watch your TV and eat your snacks. Expect to return to alive children.... that's it,” wrote another user. </p> <p>Another pointed out that although she wants her babysitter to have a clean record, she’s willing to commit tax fraud to hire them.</p> <p>“No problems with the law but she's committing tax fraud. Ok then.”</p> <p>What are your thoughts on this job ad? Let us know in the comments below. </p>

Family & Pets

Our Partners