Search

Dr Charlie Teo's surprising next move after Aussie surgery restrictions

One year after being slapped with restrictions that effectively stopped him from operating in Australia, Dr Charlie Teo is restarting his career overseas. The neurosurgeon was investigated by Australia’s Health Care Complaints Commission, who last year placed restrictions on the surgeon after they discovered he had been operating on tumours that had been deemed "inoperable". Now, one of China’s most respected neurosurgeons has thanked Australia for imposing such restrictions because it has allowed her country to benefit from the controversial surgeon’s ability to remove high-risk brain tumours. Dr Teo has been operating regularly in China including on high profile VIPs, and at least eight other countries around the world, according to reports from the Sunday Telegraph. An investigation has found Dr Teo has operated on 150 patients, with many of them being from Australia, in China, Spain, Germany, India, Switzerland, Brazil, Peru, South Africa, and Nepal since the restrictions effectively stopped him from operating in Australia. In an interview from Beijing, Professor Ling Feng, Deputy Director of the China International Neuroscience Institute, said she is “not worried” about the restrictions imposed on Dr Teo a year ago for unsatisfactory conduct. “I took a careful look into what happened over there. I don’t think it should be imputed to Charlie’s neglect of care and passion for the patients,” Professor Ling told the Sunday Telegraph. “It is just a different view of the indications for surgery. Similar cases occur across the world. Instead, I ‘thank’ Australia for the restrictions on Charlie, which gave me the opportunity to work with him.” In the past year, patients have travelled from Australia, Romania, Britain, Saudi Arabia, France, Indonesia, and Singapore to have Dr Teo operate. Of those surgeries Dr Teo’s logbook documents one death, one “poor” outcome, three “fair outcomes”, 20 “good outcomes” and 145 cases have been documented as “excellent”. Dr Teo says his results are better than ever and he feels terrible for patients in his own country that he can’t help, but hopes that he may one day be able to return to Australian operating rooms to help patients. “All it would take is one sensible and brave person in one hospital somewhere in Australia to change the status quo,” Dr Teo said. “Just one person to sit back and go ‘okay he might be an a**hole, he might be into money, he might be a bit of a cowboy, he might be all the things the media have said he might be, but the fact is that patients, Australian patients, some need him and he does operations that other people don’t do and most of those outcomes are good so what about we just drop the politics and allow him to operate in Australia?" “That’s all it would take … some common sense for the greater good, not for his sake but for the sake of patients.” Image credits: Instagram

Caring

“You look like Nicolas Cage!”: Tiny Busselton store shocked by megastar’s visit

Busselton, Western Australia - It's not every day that you walk into your local neighbourhood store and encounter a Hollywood A-lister browsing the snack aisle. Yet, that's precisely what happened to shop owner Annie Liban in her small Asian grocery store in Busselton, when none other than Nicolas Cage strolled through her doors. Cage, known for his eclectic roles and memorable performances, is rumoured to be filming his latest movie, The Surfer, in the scenic Western Australian region. The film apparently revolves around his character's return to his hometown and his unexpected feud with a local gang of surfers. A picturesque backdrop indeed for a film about beach drama, but it seems even Nic Cage needs to restock the fridge occasionally. The rumour mill had been buzzing with whispers of Cage's impending visit for a while now, but these tidbits of information didn't reach Ms Liban until the actor himself, in all his enigmatic glory, was casually perusing her store shelves one sunny afternoon. "I said, 'oh, he looks like Nicolas Cage,' but I was like, 'what's he doing in this store?'" Ms Liban recalled with astonishment <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-17/nicolas-cage-sighted-in-busselton-filming-the-surfer-movie/102986390" target="_blank" rel="noopener">to the ABC</a>. "Why is he grabbing some eggs and kimchi? We couldn't stop staring." It seems that even Ms Liban's eagle-eyed staff had a hard time recognising the star at first, but eventually, curiosity got the better of them, and they mustered up the courage to ask the million-dollar question: "Who are you?" Ms Liban described the uncanny clues that finally cracked the Cage case. "There were some clues … he was wearing boots in hot weather and a jacket, wearing some Prada sunglasses and the voice as well," she said. "And then when he picked up the oranges in front of the shop we said to him 'we only accept cash' and he said 'I only have US dollars.'" "We said, 'oh you do look like Nicolas Cage' and he said, 'I am.'" It appears that Busselton's small Asian grocery store unexpectedly became a portal to Hollywood for a brief moment. The Surfer is expected to feature local surfers from WA's South West and will be shot in the stunning locales of Margaret River and Yallingup. A call-out for the movie even went to high school students a while back, seeking youngsters with the right amount of "attitude" to star in the film. Ms Liban, a fan of Nicolas Cage from her days growing up in the Philippines, is eagerly looking forward to the movie. "We love Nicolas Cage, so I'm excited to see what he's doing here in Australia," she said with a smile. City of Busselton Mayor Grant Henley shared his enthusiasm for the unexpected Hollywood cameo in the region. "[These types of productions] have a significant economic impact on the area. Accommodation and costs for a crew of this magnitude, with 100 people here for a month, inject a substantial amount of money into the local economy," he explained. While Busselton has seen its fair share of Australian film productions like Drift with Sam Worthington and the karting-themed Go!, having Hollywood come to town adds a new layer of excitement. "I think this movie clearly has star power to bring someone like Nicolas Cage on board," Mr Henley mused. "It's a higher magnitude than some of the Australian-made films with smaller budgets and distributions. I might just bump into him while he's out exploring the region and having some fun." So if you're in the area, keep your eyes peeled as you stroll the aisles of your local grocery store – you never know when you might bump into a world-famous actor picking up some oranges and kimchi. Cage, with his eclectic filmography, truly knows how to keep us all on the edge of our seats, even when he's just shopping for groceries. Images: Facebook

Domestic Travel

Mother of Charlie Teo's "miracle girl" shares more tragic news

In the face of immense tragedy and loss, Monica Smirk, the mother of 14-year-old Amelia "Milli" Lucas, has opened up about more devastating news that has befallen her family. Amelia, fondly known as Milli, passed away a month after celebrating her 14th birthday on January 4, 2021, following a courageous battle against a rare and terminal genetic cancer. Diagnosed with a Grade VI Glioblastoma at the tender age of nine, Milli was given a mere 12 weeks to live. However, with the help of controversial neurosurgeon <a href="https://www.oversixty.com.au/health/caring/dr-charlie-teo-breaks-his-silence-with-post-about-his-miracle-girl" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Charlie Teo</a>, she defied the odds, surviving another remarkable five years after undergoing two surgeries. Now, Monica, her resilient mother, has revealed that she is facing her own battle with terminal cancer. Inoperable tumours on her back have cast a shadow of uncertainty, leaving her and her family grappling with fear and hope. The Smirk family has encountered the devastating impact of Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a rare gene disposition that has tragically claimed the lives of Monica's mother, brother, daughter, niece, and nephew. This syndrome, affecting fewer than 1,000 individuals worldwide, greatly increases the risk of various cancers throughout one's life. Recalling the emotional turmoil, Monica shared that she first discovered the lumps on her back while caring for Milli in 2021, but the overwhelming emotions held her back from seeking an immediate biopsy. As her health situation progressed, treatment was halted after fluid was found in her lungs. Nevertheless, she holds on to the possibility of further treatment options pending additional scans later this year. In another heart-wrenching update, Monica also revealed that her 19-year-old daughter Tess is awaiting the results of a concerning annual scan. Tess, who also battles Li-Fraumeni syndrome, faced her own hardships when diagnosed with a brain tumour in 2016, resulting in legal blindness. Despite the challenges, she courageously pursues her dream of becoming a professional dancer. As the Smirk family grapples with these overwhelming health challenges, their community has come together, rallying behind them with love and support. The Millstar Foundation, an initiative started by the family to honour their beloved "angel" Milli, aims to provide alternative therapies for patients in Western Australia. Their efforts have been met with an outpouring of generosity, as they have collected more than $13,000 worth of prizes for a raffle, supporting Monica in her fight for life. Milli's journey with Dr Teo, who she affectionately referred to as her "miracle worker," brought both hope and controversy. Though he successfully removed 98 percent of a brain tumour considered inoperable and incurable by other surgeons in 2019, <a href="https://www.oversixty.com.au/health/caring/dr-charlie-teo-speaks-out-after-guilty-finding" target="_blank" rel="noopener">recent incidents have led to reprimands</a> by the NSW Medical Board. While the circumstances are undoubtedly heartbreaking, Monica expressed her gratitude for the extra years Dr Teo provided Milli, acknowledging the precious time and memories they had together. Amidst the pain, Monica also spoke out about her concern for other patients who may no longer have access to potentially lifesaving surgeries due to restrictions imposed on Dr Teo. She hopes that future research and medical advancements will continue to shine a light of hope for those facing similar battles. In the face of unimaginable adversity, the Smirk family finds solace in the unwavering support and love of their community. For those who wish to contribute to the raffle and extend a helping hand to the Smirk family, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/groups/2378778672391405/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Millstar Foundation Incorporated Facebook group</a> provides an opportunity to make a difference and be a source of hope in their challenging journey. Images: Facebook

Caring

Bombshell twist in split between Australia's richest couple

Just days after announcing their separation, there has been a bombshell twist in the split between Australia's richest couple Andrew and Nicola Forrest. The couple, who were married for 31 years and have a shared fortune of $32 billion, <a href="https://oversixty.com.au/lifestyle/relationships/australia-s-richest-couple-call-it-quits" target="_blank" rel="noopener">confirmed their separation</a> in a joint statement on Wednesday after living apart for months. During those months apart, it has been revealed that Andrew's own mining company investigated allegations he had a secret relationship with an employee. The board of Mr Forrest's company Fortescue Metals Group became aware of an anonymous letter that made allegations against the mining billionaire while the Forrests were figuring out their separation. The board contacted an outside law firm to investigate claims made in the letter about the behaviour of the executive chairman towards a lower level employee. The Australian Financial Review reported the investigation included a review of whether he had a relationship with an employee at the mining company, with the investigation concluding that the allegations were unsubstantiated. "The directors of Fortescue became aware of an anonymous letter concerning the behaviour of the executive chairman," Fortescue Metals said in a statement. "The board immediately met and engaged Seyfarth Shaw LLP, to independently investigate the letter and provide a report. Seyfarth Shaw LLP provided a full report to the board." "The investigation concluded that none of the matters in the letter were substantiated. There were no adverse findings." It added that Mr Forrest was excluded from the investigation as "it related to him". Fortescue went on to say that the report in full would not be released to shareholders or to the public. The revelations the investigation emerged just days after Andrew and Nicola announced their separation. "After 31 years of marriage, we have made the decision to live apart," the couple said in a joint statement. "Our friendship and commitment to our family remains strong." Image credits: Getty Images

Legal

Charlie Teo's great walk of support

Neurosurgeon Dr Charlie Teo has now accepted work in China following the imposed conditions on his practicing certificate after complaints from the families of two patients. Despite the restrictions, many patients still in need of his surgical skills are expressing disbelief over the situation. In a message posted to social media, Dr Teo has urged his supporters to join him in solidarity for a walk across Sydney Harbour Bridge – and dozens have already committed to the walk, which will take place in September. “Many have asked what you can do to show your support," wrote the embattled surgeon. "Well, I would be honoured if you would join me in solidarity on the Sydney Harbour Bridge.” Patients are rallying their friends and family to walk with Dr Teo on September 17, in a message that emphasised that Dr Teo remains determined and will be present for the event after flying in from Spain. The decision to work in China and other countries came after the Health Care Complaints Commission (HCCC) found Dr Teo guilty of "unsatisfactory professional conduct", a verdict he vehemently denies. Dr Teo addressed those affected by brain cancer, acknowledging the severity of the disease and emphasising the importance of the Charlie Teo Foundation in offering hope and support to those affected. Dr Teo affirmed that while he would be working in various countries, he still considers Australia his home. He expressed sadness over his recent experiences within the Australian medical system but remains motivated by the work he continues to do worldwide. The announcement of Dr Teo's decision to focus on China garnered hundreds of supportive comments from social media users, along with comments left on news articles. Dr. Teo confirmed that he would soon be performing complicated brain stem surgeries in China, acknowledging that his future in Australia is likely over. As he told the <a href="https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/charlie-teo-ive-been-crucified-i-have-no-choice-but-to-try-china/news-story/61bb1af2516de2705d55143c53dece47" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Saturday Telegraph</a>: “I am not guilty of what I am accused of. I reject what they say I have done. They just don’t believe me, so why would I show remorse for something that I deny?” “I could appeal, I think I would win. They wouldn’t be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the things they have accused me of because they are not true. But I’m not sure I have the strength to run an appeal. Furthermore, I don’t have the money to do so,” he said. “And then the whole emotional turmoil.” Dr Teo instead will focus on saving lives in countries that will allow him to. “I have just been granted privileges in China, in three different hospital,” he said. “The fact that I have been crucified over here didn’t appear to affect their decision, so I am going over there to check the facilities, make sure they are good. They just bought the latest MRI for me.” Dr Teo said he was committing to a future in China “because they have committed to me” and would continue to do the occasional cases in Europe and parts of Southeast Asia that required his expertise. He expressed disappointment but not surprise at the conditions placed on his practicing certificate following an investigation into two brain surgeries with adverse outcomes. Dr Teo categorically denied any failure to obtain proper consent or lacking empathy for his patients. He expressed his reluctance to appeal the decision due to the emotional turmoil and financial constraints associated with it. Instead, he will focus on saving lives in countries that permit his expertise. Having recently been granted privileges in three hospitals in China, Dr Teo expressed his commitment to this new chapter in his career. He mentioned that the accusations against him would not hold up if challenged but admitted uncertainty regarding his ability to endure an appeal process. Dr Teo's primary concern lies in ensuring quality facilities and patient care in China. While he plans to continue performing occasional cases in Europe and Southeast Asia, he lamented the fact that he can no longer assist patients in his home country. Dr. Teo criticised the recent findings by the HCCC, stating that they send a negative message to doctors who offer contrary second opinions. He expressed concern that neurosurgeons across Australia may become reluctant to undertake risky surgeries, fearing media scrutiny and judgment from colleagues who lack the necessary expertise to treat complex tumour cases. Dr Teo also revealed that he continues to receive regular calls from individuals suffering from rare brain tumours seeking his help, but he is forced to turn them away. Image: Wikimedia

Caring

Dr Charlie Teo speaks out after guilty finding

Renowned neurosurgeon, Dr Charlie Teo, is said to be contemplating an appeal after a medical standards committee found him guilty of "unsatisfactory professional conduct". Dr. Teo has expressed concerns that this decision could potentially jeopardise the lives of numerous Australians. The Medical Professional Standards Committee recently concluded its inquiry into two serious complaints regarding Dr. Teo's conduct at Sydney's Prince of Wales Private Hospital between 2018 and 2019. The committee's ruling stated that Dr. Teo demonstrated a lack of "insight, empathy, and judgment." As a result, restrictions have been placed on his registration, preventing him from performing brain surgeries without a written statement from an approved neurosurgeon. Dr. Teo strongly denies the allegations of unprofessional conduct and is considering appealing the committee's decision, as reported by Seven News. While acknowledging the guilty verdict, he stated in an interview with Seven's Spotlight, "In terms of the complaints, if they found me guilty then I have to take that on the chin." He also expressed his satisfaction that the committee refrained from imposing further conditions. However, he is concerned about the possibility of facing difficulties finding a hospital in Australia that would allow him to continue performing surgeries. During the Spotlight interview, presenter Michael Usher emphasised that Dr. Teo genuinely cares for his patients, who might now have to travel overseas to seek his services. Usher quoted Dr. Teo, saying, "In his words - it sounds very strong but he's standing by them - he believes that thousands of Australians will die because of this decision against him." The disciplinary hearing earlier this year revolved around two female patients who experienced severe brain injuries after undergoing surgeries performed by Dr. Teo in 2018 and 2019. In its ruling, the committee found that Dr. Teo had proceeded with surgeries where the risks outweighed the potential benefits, failing to obtain informed consent from both patients. Furthermore, he charged an inappropriate fee of $35,000 to one of the women and used inappropriate language while speaking to her daughter. The committee expressed concerns about Dr. Teo's lack of reflection in his judgment and his failure to provide statistical data or peer support to justify his decisions. Although Dr. Teo expressed sorrow and took responsibility for the unfavourable outcomes of the surgeries, he did not demonstrate remorse for offering surgery to the patients. This lack of insight troubled the committee. Consequently, the committee reprimanded Dr. Teo and imposed restrictions on his practicing certificate. To perform recurrent malignant intracranial tumour and brain stem tumour surgical procedures, he must now obtain a written statement from a Medical Council-approved neurosurgeon. Dr. Teo retains the option to appeal the committee's decision to the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal. Image: Instagram

Caring

What happens when doctors don’t act as they should? And what’s the ruling against neurosurgeon Charlie Teo?

<a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/christopher-rudge-108366">Christopher Rudge</a>, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-sydney-841">University of Sydney</a> After several years of controversy, and both praise and blame for his willingness to perform high-risk surgeries, neurosurgeon Charlie Teo has been subject to <a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/nsw/NSWMPSC//2023/2.html">practice restrictions</a> by a special committee of the Medical Council of New South Wales. <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> Charlie Teo was fighting two complaints of unprofessional conduct from the families of two different women, who say they were not properly warned about the risk of death before consenting to surgery. <a href="https://t.co/gvhiQdWnRF">https://t.co/gvhiQdWnRF</a> — ABC News (@abcnews) <a href="https://twitter.com/abcnews/status/1678952850238349312?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 12, 2023</a></blockquote> So how does the process of restricting doctors’ medical practice work? And what did this mean for Teo? <h2>How are health practitioners regulated in Australia?</h2> Health practitioner regulators in Australia aren’t generally empowered to make punitive decisions about health professionals’ conduct. Instead, Australia’s health practitioner regulations (the so-called “national law”) require decision-makers to exercise their powers to protect patients. They operate in what is often called a “<a href="https://www.mcnsw.org.au/sites/default/files/case_note_-_legal_case_note_-_medical_council_v_lee_-_concerning_stay_applications.pdf">protective jurisdiction</a>”. And though the regulator may sometimes impose fines, it is rare. That’s because it may do so only <a href="https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-2009-86a#sec.146C">when</a> it is “satisfied there is no other order, or combination of orders, that is appropriate in the public interest”. In all state <a href="https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-2009-86a#sec.3A">versions</a> of the national law, regulators may <a href="https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-2009-hprnlq#sec.3A">restrict doctors’ medical practices</a> only if it’s “necessary to ensure health services are provided safely and of an appropriate quality”. But the NSW national law includes additional wording. In all its decisions, the regulator <a href="https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/whole/html/inforce/current/act-2009-86a#sec.3A">must regard</a> the “health and safety of the public” as the “paramount consideration.” This can have unusual effects. As the <a href="https://www.ama.com.au/sites/default/files/2022-03/Ahpra---Regulatory-guide---a-full-guide.PDF">Australian Health Practitioners Regulation Agency (AHPRA)</a> acknowledges, requirements to protect the public may sometimes result in “a determination that is harsher on the practitioner than if punishment were the sole purpose”. <h2>What happened in the Teo case?</h2> In late 2022, proceedings commenced against Teo via two complaints by the New South Wales <a href="https://www.hccc.nsw.gov.au/">Health Care Complaints Commission</a> (HCCC). The complaints concerned two brain surgeries on two patients. Both involved “radical resections” (“en bloc” removals) of these patients’ brain tumours. Tragically, neither patient regained consciousness after the operations and both patients died – one just ten days after. In legal terms, the complaints were based on a provision of the national law that defines certain categories of wrongdoing as <a href="https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/whole/html/inforce/current/act-2009-86a#sec.139B">unsatisfactory professional conduct</a>. The HCCC alleged Teo had engaged in two categories of this wrongdoing: conduct below the standard reasonably expected of a doctor of his training and experience, and unethical conduct. The HCCC alleged Teo’s decisions to operate were inappropriate and substandard because the risks of “neurological morbidity” (so-called brain death) outweighed the (potential) benefits of the interventions. There was no allegation that Teo’s surgical skills were substandard. The surgeries were also unethical, it was alleged, as informed consent had not been obtained from the patients and one patient was required to pay an expensive upfront fee in circumstances of clear vulnerability. <h2>What were the findings and consequences for Teo?</h2> The HCCC Professional Standards Committee, made up of an experienced judge, two expert neurosurgeons and a lay member, applied the civil standard of proof – the balance of probabilities – to the evidence. Though the committee is not legally bound to <a href="https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-2009-86a#sch.5D-sec.2">apply the rules of evidence</a> applied in criminal courts, it decided, broadly for procedural fairness reasons, to receive and consider all of Teo’s unchallenged evidence. In a decision of more than 100 pages, the committee found Teo guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct. It determined to “reprimand” Teo (this means a <a href="https://www.medicalboard.gov.au/sitecore/content/Home/Registration/Monitoring-and-compliance/Removal-of-reprimands.aspx">record of “reprimand” is</a> noted on the public copy of his practitioner licence) and to impose four conditions on his practice. Three conditions involve increased oversight of his practice records. But a more restrictive condition will require Teo to obtain written support from a neurosurgeon approved by the Medical Council of New South Wales for any neurosurgery involving “recurring malignant tumours in the brain or brain stem”. While this order was hotly contested in the proceedings, the committee determined that, for reasons including Teo’s evidenced “isolation from his peers”, the condition was “necessary to protect the health and safety of the public”. <h2>What about patient autonomy or clinical freedom?</h2> Difficult ethical questions arise in medical regulation. Here, the committee had to balance the practitioner’s right to practise medicine against the paramount consideration of patient health and safety and against the patient’s right to exercise autonomy. This last right is sometimes seen as a patient’s <a href="https://jme.bmj.com/content/40/5/293">moral right to be wrong</a>. On these considerations, the committee relied on accepted evidence from ethical experts that proposed that, as a matter of ethics, "a surgeon does not have a licence to undertake any conceivable procedure even with the agreement or acquiescence of the patient." <h2>Is medical regulation strict in Australia and NSW?</h2> Many <a href="https://www.ahpra.gov.au/News/2016-08-10-Independent-review-on-chaperoning.aspx">reviews</a> and <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3668054">academic</a> <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34907681/">studies</a> find the national law to be fair and appropriate, or not strict enough. However, some scholars and representative groups including the Australian Medical Association (AMA) find some aspects <a href="https://www.ama.com.au/ama-rounds/16-july-2021/articles/upholding-natural-justice-doctors">are</a> too <a href="https://www.ama.com.au/media/law-change-threatens-doctors-hard-earned-reputations-and-risks-their-mental-health">strict</a> and <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36763016/">unsympathetic</a> to practitioners. But a potted history of NSW medical history showcases how successive medical scandals have tended to drive strong regulatory reform. In 1984, when the tragic impacts of the shocking and unethical treatment at <a href="https://piac.asn.au/legal-help/public-interest-cases/deep-sleep-tragedy/">Chelmsford psychiatric hospital</a> were <a href="http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ALRCRefJl/1988/77.pdf">coming to light</a>, NSW was the first jurisdiction globally to establish a complaints body for health consumers. Known as the Complaints Unit, this body is now the HCCC. Another milestone occurred in the early 2000s following several scandals, including the so-called “Butcher of Bega” episode. An <a href="https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/ladocs/inquiries/2112/Final%20Report%20on%20Graeme%20Reeves.pdf">inquiry</a> into these events prompted the NSW government to introduce laws permitting medical practitioners to be immediately suspended if the regulator considered it was in the “public interest”. This was the first power of its kind in Australia and was only adopted into the broader national law of other states in <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/AH19293">2018</a>. <h2>What next for Teo?</h2> Teo may appeal the orders of the committee to the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal or seek a review of the conditions. But as the conditions are not subject to an end date, it appears they will otherwise continue indefinitely.<img style="border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important;" src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/209612/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /> <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/christopher-rudge-108366">Christopher Rudge</a>, Law lecturer, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-sydney-841">University of Sydney</a> Image credits: Instagram This article is republished from <a href="https://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/what-happens-when-doctors-dont-act-as-they-should-and-whats-the-ruling-against-neurosurgeon-charlie-teo-209612">original article</a>.

Legal

Australia's richest couple call it quits

Australia's richest couple have announced their separation after 31 years of marriage. Andrew and Nicola Forrest, who made their fortune through their mining company Fortescue Metals, said their split would have no impact on their work projects. "After 31 years of marriage, we have made the decision to live apart," the couple said in a joint statement. "Our friendship and commitment to our family remains strong." "There is no impact on the operations, control or direction of Fortescue, Minderoo or Tattarang." The couple said they would aim to convey a sense of stability for their business during the transition. "We will continue our shared mission to create and gift our wealth to tackle community and global challenges, as recently shown by last month's donation of one-fifth of our Fortescue shareholding to Minderoo Foundation," they said. The news of their split comes after Mr Forrest gave Ms Forrest half the ownership of their flagship company, Tattarang, and more than $1.1 billion worth of Fortescue shares was moved into a new company, Coaxial Ventures, owned by her, according to the <a title="Australian Financial Review" href="https://www.afr.com/companies/mining/andrew-and-nicola-forrest-to-pursue-separate-lives-20230712-p5dnpi" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Australian Financial Review</a>. Mr Forrest remains Australia's second-richest person in the latest AFR <a title="Rich List" href="http://Australian Financial Review's annual Rich List" target="" rel="">Rich List</a>, with an estimated wealth of $31.44 billion, as only fellow mining magnate Gina Rinehart is richer, with $44.33 billion to her name. After amassing their billions in the mining industry, the Forrests founded the philanthropic Minderoo Foundation in 2001. Its work in recent years has included several environmental projects and supplying millions of Covid-19 tests to Australia in the early days of the pandemic. Image credits: Getty Images

Relationships

Charlie Teo’s fate after guilty finding

The recent guilty finding of "unsatisfactory professional conduct" against renowned neurosurgeon Dr Charlie Teo by the NSW Health Care Complaints Commission has raised questions about the potential ramifications for his career. Known for his expertise in treating complex brain tumours, Dr Teo has been the subject of controversy and scrutiny in recent years. Amid allegations and concerns over his high fees and unconventional treatment methods, a disciplinary inquiry was launched to examine his professional conduct. Following that inquiry, Dr Teo was <a href="https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/nsw/NSWMPSC/2023/2.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">found guilty of "unsatisfactory professional conduct"</a>. This finding suggests that his actions or omissions have fallen short of the expected standards of professional behaviour within the medical field. While the finding is significant, it is crucial to understand its specific implications. Dr Teo's guilty finding will almost certainly negatively impact his professional reputation, as it raises questions about his adherence to ethical guidelines and best practices. This development could affect his relationships with patients, colleagues, and medical institutions. Of course, the guilty finding may also have legal ramifications, potentially resulting in disciplinary actions such as fines, suspension, or even revocation of his medical license. The finding could also erode the trust and confidence that patients have in Dr Teo's abilities. Other medical professionals and institutions may also hesitate to collaborate with Dr Teo in the future due to concerns about his professional conduct. However, it's important to note that a guilty finding does not necessarily invalidate all of Dr Teo's contributions and achievements as a neurosurgeon. His expertise and experience in treating complex brain tumours have undoubtedly helped numerous patients in desperate situations. However, the finding does highlight areas where improvements in professional conduct may be necessary if Dr Teo is to rebuild his professional trust. While this guilty finding is undoubtedly a significant setback, Teo's future prospects are not entirely predetermined. It will depend on how he responds, whether he takes steps to address the concerns raised, and his ability to rebuild trust with patients, colleagues and the broader medical community. The guilty finding of unsatisfactory professional conduct against Dr Teo carries significant implications for his career. It has the potential to affect his professional reputation, legal standing, patient confidence, and collaborative opportunities. However, Dr Teo had already alleged to the media several times that the inquiry was instigated solely because his "enemies" had manipulated and coerced two grieving widowers into lodging complaints against him. Considering Dr Teo's previous statements about the lack of support from Australian surgeons, leading him to practically abandon surgery in his home country, it remains to be seen in real terms how this recent decision will affect his career, if it does at all. With appropriate actions and a commitment to addressing these concerns, Dr Teo may be able to navigate this challenging period and work towards rebuilding trust and maintaining his contributions in the field of neurosurgery. Image: Instagram

Body

“I may as well give you the inside story”: Dr Charlie Teo unleashes on tribunal

Dr Charlie Teo has revealed his true thoughts on a five-day disciplinary hearing by the Health Care Complaints Commission. The commission launched their inquiry into two cases where Teo performed brain surgery on two patients who ultimately passed away, in the wake of accusations of negligence. And while Teo denied any negligence on his part, he did admit that he was responsible, telling the hearing that he believed he had been “too aggressive”. It was during a speech to guests at his annual Rebel Ball - the “Charlie Teo Foundation’s premier event supporting the visionaries and revolutionaries tackling brain cancer head-on” - that he unleashed, slamming the Health Care Complaints Commission and the hearing. At the Crown Sydney, Teo took to the stage to a roar of applause from his supporters, and began by telling them “you here tonight have stuck with me and I can't thank you enough for your loyalty. “Everyone's been asking me about the tribunal. I may as well give you the inside story. “The tribunal was absolute f***ing bulls**t.” It isn’t the first time that Teo had spoken out against the strikes against himself and his career, with the neurosurgeon having <a href="https://www.oversixty.com.au/news/news/the-agenda-is-to-destroy-charlie-teo-final-hit-ahead-of-hearing">previously confessed to Mark Bouris</a> that “it’s got nothing to do with fairness, what’s right or wrong. It’s all got to do with people’s agendas. And the agenda is to destroy Charlie Teo.” And outside of his March hearing, Teo insisted that restrictions from prior hearings had potentially cost lives, with the neurosurgeon noting that he hadn’t been able to save lives that he knew he could have. The end goal of Teo’s Rebel Ball was just that: helping people, and ultimately saving lives. In a post to the Charlie Teo Foundation’s Facebook page, it was declared that the event had “transformed the future”, having raised over $1 million “for game-changing brain cancer research”. Among the guests and contributors were the likes of former Australian cricketers Steve Waugh and Gavin Robertson, former Olympic volleyballer Kerri Potthurst, “the last man to represent NSW at both cricket and rugby league” Graeme Hughes, and Labor’s Graham Richardson. Brain tumour survivor Beatrice McBride was also in attendance, and even performed with her father, Slide McBride, with a song she’d written for Teo. The musical entertainment continued from there, with Mondo Rock’s Paul Christie joining The Hidley Street Country Club Band on stage. Supporters were quick to flock to Teo’s side after the event, sharing their congratulations for a successful fundraising effort, and their delight at seeing so many prepared to stand by him. “Amazing result,” one wrote, “well done to everyone giving Charlie the support.” “It was a great night had by all. Thanks to all the big supporters for their massive contributions. Just proves Charlie can still pull a crowd of true believers. There was no room for the haters,” another declared. Meanwhile, another summed it up - and echoed the majority - when they shared that they were “so happy folk supported Charlie.” Images: Facebook

News

Victoria Beckham's birthday snaps squash feud rumour

Victoria Beckham continues to squash feud rumours between her and daughter-in-law Nicola, as she shared intimate snaps from her 49th birthday dinner. The star celebrated her birthday with a fancy dinner accompanied by her husband, David Beckham, her four children, and her daughter-in-law, Nicola. “I love you,” she captioned one of her photos tagging Brooklyn and Nicola. In the picture, Nicola can be seen sitting in the middle of Brooklyn and Harper with her arms around them, fitting right into the Beckham family. The former Spice Girl also posted a picture showing a lit up birthday cake and Brooklyn and Nicola sitting across from her smiling from ear to ear. Rumours about the feud had started during Brooklyn and Nicola’s wedding last year, where it was reported that the two women had argued over Nicola’s dress. In an interview for the Cosmopolitan, Nicola had briefly mentioned the rumours surrounding her wedding. "I've said this so many times: There's no feud. I don't know. No one ever wants to write the nice things," she said. "It's really weird, actually, whether it's my life or someone else's life or whatever, when you know the truth and then you read something totally wrong,” she added. In recent months, it seems that the pair had gotten closer and Victoria’s photos appear to have squashed the rumours once and for all. Images: Instagram Take a look for yourself:

Family & Pets

“We can let you rest now”: Devastating development in missing Nicola Bulley case

Police in the United Kingdom have confirmed that a body found in a cluster of weeds by the River Wyre has been identified as missing mother-of-two Nicola Bulley. Nicola was last seen in St Michael’s on Wyre, Lancashire, just after 9am on January 27. Her body was discovered just over a kilometre from where she disappeared. Nicola was walking her dog along the river after dropping her children off at school when she failed to return. Her mobile phone was found on a bench, still connected to a conference call for work, and her dog - a springer spaniel named Willow - was nearby. “We were called today at 11.36am to reports of a body in the River Wyre, close to Rawcliffe Road," local police reported. "An underwater search team and specialist officers have subsequently attended the scene, entered the water and have sadly recovered a body." Formal identification was required before it could be confirmed that it was Nicola's body, with police announcing the process was complete and the confirmation made at a press conference on Monday. “Sadly, we are now able to confirm that yesterday we recovered Nicola Bulley from the River Wyre,” Lancashire Police's Assistant Chief Constable Peter Lawson said. "Nicola’s family have been informed and are, of course, devastated. Our thoughts are with them at this time, as well as with all her loved ones and the wider community. "We recognise the huge impact that Nicola’s disappearance has had on her family and friends, but also on the people of St Michael’s. "We would like to thank all of those who have helped during what has been a hugely complex and highly emotional investigation. "Today’s development is not the outcome any of us would have wanted, but we hope that it can at least start to provide some answers for Nicola’s loved ones, who remain foremost in our thoughts.” Assistant Chief Constable Lawson added that the case was now being handled by HM Coroner, and that the cause of her death is being treated as unexplained. In the wake of the tragic news breaking, Nicola’s family also issued a statement and emotional tribute for their late loved one. “Finally, Nikki, you are no longer a missing person, you have been found. We can let you rest now,” they said. “We will never be able to comprehend what Nikki had gone through in her last moments and that will never leave us. “We will never forget Nikki - how could we? - she was the centre of our world, she was the one who made our lives so special and nothing will cast a shadow over that. “Our girls will get the support they need from the people who love them the most.” Images: Getty

Caring

"If you want to kick him, come kick me too”: Stars turn out to defend Charlie Teo

Famous friends of Dr Charlie Teo have defended his character and shown their support as the neurosurgeon faces a five-day disciplinary hearing by the Health Care Complaints Commission. Steve Waugh and Anthony Mundine were among Dr Teo’s high profile mates who spoke to <a href="https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/anthony-mundine-steve-waugh-supporting-controversial-surgeon-dr-charlie-teo/news-story/bb8567814607fe4fcdbd8f5dbaaa4a73" target="_blank" rel="noopener">news.com.au</a> outside the Health Professional Councils Authority building on Monday morning. Mundine said he has known Dr Teo, who has divided critics for his work on brain tumours deemed inoperable by other neurosurgeons, “for some time”. “I just know the character the man is… We’ve built a good relationship over the years, and got closer and closer,” he said. “He’s been blessed with unbelievable skills in the neurosurgeon game and is one of the best in the world”. Mundine was then quizzed on his thoughts about the criticism Dr Teo has faced in recent months, saying, “There will be people that hate it… it’s a 50/50 game, you’re gonna win some, you lose some.” “But I’m here. If you want to kick him, come kick me too”. Also showing his support for the controversial doctor was cricketing legend Steve Waugh, who claims Dr Teo saved his wife Lynette’s life when he removed a large blood clot from her brain. “I’ve referred him to a number of friends as well,” Waugh said. “He’s done an amazing job – over 11,000 operations. He takes some of the tough cases no one else wants to”. He said it was “hard for me to know why people don’t like him” but thought it could be a “little bit of tall poppy syndrome”. “I guess it makes him a target with some people,” Waugh said. “I just hope he gets a fair go.” The support from famous friends comes after Teo <a href="https://www.oversixty.com.au/news/news/the-agenda-is-to-destroy-charlie-teo-final-hit-ahead-of-hearing" target="_blank" rel="noopener">lashed out</a> against the recent allegations made against him of unprofessional conduct, saying that such claims are driven by professional jealousy, and are largely designed to take him down and to prevent the rise of any good, young “aggressive” neurosurgeons. Appearing on a podcast with businessman and former TV host Mark Bouris, Teo said,“It’s got nothing to do with fairness, what’s right or wrong. It’s all got to do with people’s agendas. And the agenda is to destroy Charlie Teo.” “I know that I’ve got this skill … I take out tumours that no one else can take out. And all the surgeons around the world that watch me are just absolutely amazed by it. So when I operate in other countries, I get four or five or 10 or 20 neurosurgeons watching it, and they just are blown away by it.” Image credits: Instagram <div class="media image portrait side-by-side" style="caret-color: #000000; color: #000000; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; box-sizing: inherit; display: flex; flex-direction: column; align-items: center; width: 338.492645px; float: left; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 14.099264px; margin-bottom: 24px;"> </div>

Legal

“The agenda is to destroy Charlie Teo”: Final hit ahead of hearing

Appearing on a podcast with businessman and former TV host Mark Bouris, famed neurosurgeon Charlie Teo has lashed out against the recent allegations made against him of unprofessional conduct, saying that such claims are driven by professional jealousy, and are largely designed to take him down and to prevent the rise of any good, young “aggressive” neurosurgeons. Teo is set to face an additional disciplinary hearing by the Health Care Complaints Commission, and did not hold back in his assessment of the attacks on him and his career to date. “It’s got nothing to do with fairness, what’s right or wrong,” he said to podcast host Bouris. “It’s all got to do with people’s agendas. And the agenda is to destroy Charlie Teo.” “I know that I’ve got this skill … I take out tumours that no one else can take out. And all the surgeons around the world that watch me are just absolutely amazed by it. So when I operate in other countries, I get four or five or 10 or 20 neurosurgeons watching it, and they just are blown away by it.” Teo also told Bouris that the worst thing about being “subjected to all this vexatious vilification by colleagues” is that it sends a message to “all those good, young, aggressive neurosurgeons” that “if you try and do what Charlie does, this is what’s going to happen to you.” He alleged that one of the doctors complaining about him is “in competition with me.” The surgeon also claimed that he was “being judged by your enemies … it’s totally stacked”. Teo also took aim at sections of the press for publishing articles and airing shows that called his practice and motives into question. Channel Nine’s 60 Minutes program in particular <a href="https://www.oversixty.com.au/health/caring/opinions-divided-over-fresh-dr-charlie-teo-claims" target="_blank" rel="noopener">interviewed several of Dr Teo’s past patients</a>, one of whom spoke about the "false hope" given to his family when dealing with the surgeon. The program claimed that Teo had charged families huge sums of money for ultimately futile operations. While the HCCC was investigating those initial complaints, Teo’s brain stem surgeries were deemed a possible public health and safety risk. After an urgent hearing of the NSW Medical Council in August 2021, conditions were placed on Teo’s ability to practice. Teo also told Bouris on his podcast that medical authorities “can always hide behind this feigned altruism or public safety concept” and that the real reason he could no longer operate in Australia was that his colleagues were resentful of his ability to “take out tumours that other people have called inoperable”. Teo complained that just because he has had some bad surgical outcomes, these shouldn’t negate thousands of other successful surgeries. Teo also rejected the claims of overcharging patients, saying a mentor had once advised him to charge what you think you deserve. “I haven’t really wanted this to be known, but I’ll tell you now…more than half my patients I don’t charge,” he told Bouris. Teo also said that as he nears the end of his professional medical career he wanted people to know that he “didn’t charge police officers, fellow doctors, nurses, friends of friends, pensioners who couldn’t afford it.” “There are some countries in the world that want me,” continued Teo on the podcast. “But as soon as [they] find out that I'm operating in a particular country, they go and try and destroy my reputation there as well. “I'm not going to say anything at this stage, but a few countries have been trying to seduce me to operate there. “So I'm hopefully going to be able to operate in some other countries.” Image: Instagram

News

Karl Stefanovic forced to apologise for defending Dr Charlie Teo

Karl Stefanovic has apologised to his colleagues at Nine after their onslaught on Dr Charlie Teo despite him claiming he is a dear friend of his. Dr Teo has been the subject of media attacks from the Nine Network over his practices and ethics as a neurosurgeon. The Today Show co-host came out swinging and refuted the attacks at Dr Teo who he considers one of his close friends. “I adore him and I love him and I'm just sorry this whole thing's gone on for so long and continues to go on,” Karl told Daily Mail Australia last week. “The pile-on with Charlie is very difficult to watch given how much I know he is committed to the profession and how much great work he does and how many lives he's saved. “I would hate to see this guy and all of his talent exterminated from a profession that he's so gifted at. It would be a travesty.” After his comments, it was confirmed by ABC's Media Watch that Karl wrote an apology to his colleagues at Nine for “undermining” their work. Media Watch host Paul Barry said there was “significant upset” in the Sydney Morning Herald workplace. Karl is an ambassador for the Charlie Teo Foundation and has previously spoken out about how he helped save several of his friend’s lives. “I would ring him because I had friends or family members that needed urgent medical care and within minutes he would find me doctors for them,” Karl previously said. “And I'm talking dozens of friends. No matter where he was around the world Charlie Teo would pick up the phone. “Sometimes he would be just out of surgery and say ‘I'll call you back in an hour and half because I'm in the US’ or Papua New Guinea or wherever.” He said that Dr Teo would call back and that within “two hours” his friends would have appointments “with the best in the world”. “He has legitimately saved my friends' lives and it's not even him performing the surgery. “It's him going above and beyond to find doctors around the world to help people he doesn't even know because they're friends of mine and that's how deeply he cares. “The guy doesn't just talk the talk, he absolutely walks the walk as a friend.” Images: Nine/Instagram

News

"Shame on you!”: Dr Teo’s rumoured fiancée comes to his defence

Dr Charlie Teo’s alleged fiancée and former patient has spoken out publicly in defence of the disgraced surgeon and slammed recent media reports. Traci Griffiths hit out at reports initiated through a joint investigation by 60 Minutes and Nine newspapers, resulting in claims emerging from disgruntled patients and their families that Dr Teo offered them false hope in performing procedures. One patient claimed Dr Teo operated on the wrong side of her brain, but the 64-year-old surgeon has since rejected and corrected this claim. In the aftermath of these claims, Griffiths took to social media to defend Dr Teo, sharing a quote from Mister Rogers: “Honesty is often very hard. The truth is often painful. But the freedom it can bring is worth the trying.” <blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/CkIaIK6p6IC/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"> </div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;"> <div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: 8px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: auto;"> <div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"> </div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CkIaIK6p6IC/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Traci Griffiths (@veganforearth)</a> </div> </blockquote> The model, animal activist, and pet apparel designer also shared a screenshot of a 60 Minutes exclusive article with Dr Teo, adding to the caption: “I’m so proud of this extraordinary human! He shouldn’t have to spend his time and energy constantly refuting all this media BS! #ShameonyouAustralia!” Ms Griffiths also shared a link to the full 60 Minutes interview, in which Dr Teo told host Tracy Grimshaw that a current project could see him operate again in Australia while avoiding the hospital system and “politics of medicine”. “I do have a project going on at the moment … at Blacktown, where they may be building an institute in my name that will be a centre of excellence for neurosurgery and neurosciences,” he said. “If there’s a place in Australia that says, ‘We want you with open arms, we love what you’re doing, we’re going to support you’, I’ll take it in a heartbeat.” This comes after the NSW Medical Council ruled that Dr Teo couldn’t perform procedures without written approval from an independent neurosurgeon in 2021, and amid recent reports he has been performing surgeries in Spain. Ms Griffith’s comments come days after she was spotted leaving a Sydney Gala event hand-in-hand with Dr Teo and flashed a diamond ring. While Dr Teo has denied rumours that the pair are engaged, Ms Griffiths has shared photos of the pair with hashtags including “#ilovemyfiance” and “#myfiance”. <blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cedf4vsJEmI/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"> </div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;"> <div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: 8px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: auto;"> <div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"> </div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cedf4vsJEmI/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Traci Griffiths (@veganforearth)</a> </div> </blockquote> Ms Griffiths received treatment from Dr Teo in 2011 after she was diagnosed with a brain tumour. While Dr Teo has admitted he made mistakes during his surgeries during a recent interview with A Current Affair, an investigation by <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/national/some-people-pay-the-price-risk-and-reward-in-charlie-teo-s-world-20221027-p5btfi.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Sydney Morning Herald</a> reported that several families were unaware that the surgeon made mistakes while operating on their family members. Prasanta Barman, an engineer from India whose four-year-old son Mikolaj was operated on by Dr Teo, told the outlet that he “could not sleep the whole night” after hearing the admission that Dr Teo’s surgery had injured his son. Following the operation, Mikolaj didn’t walk again or speak and died months later. “This is totally new to me. He never told us that something wrong happened during surgery and that led to his critical condition. I came to know this only now and that also from the TV,” Mr Barman said. In October 2018, Mr Barman paid $80,000 for Dr Teo to perform a 10-hour operation on Mikolaj at a Singapore hospital. The surgeon then spent ten minutes telling Mikolaj’s parents he had removed 85 percent of the tumour and that it appeared benign. But, Mr Barman said that after the operation Mikolaj was “in the bed in a vegetative state, he cannot play, he can just blink his eyes, and say yes or no to us”. Image: @veganforearth (Instagram)

News

“Absolute lie": Furious Charlie Teo hits back at 60 Minutes piece

Neurosurgeon Dr Charlie Teo has slammed 60 Minutes for claims that he charged hefty prices for futile operations that left patients severely injured and families with false hope. In a one-on-one interview with A Current Affair’s Tracy Grimshaw, Dr Teo responded to a “comprehensive” story aired by the program last weekend, in which multiple families shared their upset about the large financial burdens placed on them and feeling that they had been given false hope by the acclaimed surgeon. Dr Teo dubbed the report as “abhorrent and disgusting”, and while he admitted he had made mistakes in his career, he said the idea that he was simply in it for the money was false. “For some outsiders not sitting in the room with you having a discussion with the patient, it‘s so wrong for them to judge you on what’s going on in the room,” he said. “If someone is trying to portray me as some money-hungry bastard that was operating and hurting children based on money, that’s what I want to correct. It’s not that case.” The surgeon, who is currently under investigation by the Health Care Complaints Commission, told 2GB host Ben Fordham on Wednesday that he does have regrets about mistakes he’s made. “But I deny the accusation that it means nothing to me,” Dr Teo said. “I treat all my patients like a member of my own family.” When asked if he was sorry about the mistakes he’s made, Dr Teo said he was and that “you would have to be a sociopath” not to be sorry. “You’d have to be a sociopath not to be sorry because every mistake means some sort of bad outcome for the patient which means quality of life issues, sometimes even death, or paralysis, inability to speak,” he added. “I mean, if that didn’t affect you, you’d be like Dr Death, you’d be some sort of a psychopath.” During his 60 Minutes interview, Dr Teo responded to the case of one patient who lost their vision, explaining that he never gave 100 percent certainty that the procedure wouldn’t result in blindness. “If I had guaranteed that there was no chance of blindness, that is me saying the wrong thing, that’s misinformation,” he said. “I don’t do that, you can’t do that and not get sued, someone will sue you one day and after 11,000 cases, you don’t think if I have set out to a handful of patients I’d be sued by those patients? “In that case, I thought the chance of blindness was almost zero, but I never give a guarantee. They are claiming I said that I guarantee you won’t be blind, that is absolute lie, I did not say that I would never say that you be foolish to say that.” Dr Teo revealed that he has photos of his patients on his phone to remind him of the importance of his job, saying that he carried the devastation of failed operations with him every day. “There is a French vascular surgeon who wrote a book on the philosophy of surgery, and I don’t think you can put in any better words when he said ‘every surgeon carries with himself a small cemetery’,” he said. “My cemetery is not small, it’s a significant sized cemetery. (I have) pictures of my patients on my phone to remind me every day I’ve got to do it better.” While some of his former patients have been critical of the neurosurgeon, others have leapt to his defence, including 24-year-old Monica Lopresti. After she began to lose her memory in early 2021 but her blood tests returned normal results, it wasn’t until she received the results of an MRI in 2022 that it was discovered that she had a benign cystic tumour in the middle of her brain. Seven neurosurgeons turned her away, but Dr Teo agreed to perform surgery on her. Ms Lopresti said Dr Teo explained the risks, which included death, paralysis and being left in a vegetative state, and that she agreed to proceed with the knowledge of the risks. She added that “it just isn’t true” that the surgeon gave people false hope. “I wasn’t living a life. I was always calling in sick and I wasn’t having the quality of life that I wanted,” she told news.com.au. Since August 2021, Dr Teo has been banned from performing operations in Australia but still receives daily requests for help, telling the podcast The Soda Room that he estimates that nine patients a week are left without lifesaving care as a result. “So the sadness of the situation is that my entire practice was mostly taking out tumours that other people called inoperable, so that was 90 per cent of my practice,” he said. “That’s 10 tumours a week. So that means, quite conceivably, that there are nine patients a week, who are missing out on either extension of life or cure from a condition that I know that I can help. Now that’s sad.” Images: A Current Affair

Caring

Opinions divided over fresh Dr Charlie Teo claims

Neurosurgeon Dr Charlie Teo has once again been on the receiving end of harsh claims from past patients in a brutal expose by 60 Minutes. The renowned brain surgeon has made headlines multiple times in the past for his achievements – such as when he flew from Perth to Sydney to perform a lifesaving operation on then 14-year-old Amelia “Milli” Lucas after she raised $170,000. However, Dr Teo has continued to face backlash, with some families who’ve dealt with the surgeon criticising him for the high price of his services. Channel Nine’s 60 Minutes program interviewed several of Dr Teo’s past patients, one of whom spoke about the "false hope" given to his family when dealing with the surgeon. Michelle Smith was only 19 when Dr Teo operated on her to remove a brain tumour that was causing her severe epileptic episodes. Ms Smith and her mother told the program that Dr Teo claimed that the removal of the tumour would be “easy” and after the operation “everything is great”. The program went on to state that Dr Teo soon told Ms Smith that she was able to stop taking her epilepsy medication but as the years went on she experienced worse seizures. “The seizures got worse…I lost my employment, I’d had a few jobs here and there,” Ms Smith said. “I had a seizure behind the wheel and hit two parked cars, writing off three cars.” <img src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/2022/10/michelle24.jpg" alt="" width="1280" height="720" /> Later in 2014, Ms Smith had another scan for her brain, after which other doctors claimed that Dr Teo had operated on the wrong side. “The previous operation was done on the wrong side of the brain and that’s why the normal brain tissue was removed, it was nowhere near the tumour,” Ms Smith continued on the program. “To find out that he didn’t even touch it, I just felt violated in a way. I trusted him.” Dr Teo defended himself saying that he “never, ever” operated on the wrong side of the brain and that the approach he used was well documented to reduce the risk. “Ms Smith awoke in excellent neurological condition and was seizure free at her post-op visit,” he said. <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> A decade after going under the knife of Dr Charlie Teo to remove a brain tumour, Michelle Smith made a horrific discovery; the neurosurgeon had actually operated on the wrong side of her brain. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/60Mins?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#60Mins</a> <a href="https://t.co/YnBCqhCDfz">pic.twitter.com/YnBCqhCDfz</a> — 60 Minutes Australia (@60Mins) <a href="https://twitter.com/60Mins/status/1584118918276608000?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 23, 2022</a></blockquote> A colleague of Dr Teo's, Dr Michael Donnellan, backed up Teo's claim, telling the <a href="https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/neurosurgeon-charlie-teo-says-claims-have-been-a-slur-on-his-character/news-story/bcd505006874929187ca31d406421a00" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Daily Telegraph</a> that "there is a big difference between a wrong side surgery, versus a contralateral approach — or approach from the opposite side — to a tumour that is close to the midline of the brain.... This is a well recognised and reasonable approach,” he said, adding he had seen Dr Teo choose that method multiple times with good results. This, however, did not stop Ms Smith from suing Dr Teo in 2019 for professional negligence. The case was settled out of court. Another of Dr Teo’s patients examined by the 60 Minutes program was Prasanta Barman’s young son Mikolaj who was diagnosed with a diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) - a difficult brain tumour to treat. The family sought the help of Dr Teo who they say informed them that there was a “very high likelihood of (a) cure”. “If all goes as planned, the surgery should be curative, as we should be able to remove the entire thing. This means that prognosis would be excellent,” Dr Teo’s office said in an email in 2018. However, two other neurosurgeons informed Mr Barman that his son’s tumour was inoperable. This led Mr Barman to once again ask Dr Teo about his stance and his response remained unchanged and that he would operate. Mr Barman paid Dr Teo the $80,000 required for the operation and 30 minutes before the operation he said that he might not be able to remove the entire tumour. <img src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/2022/10/mikolaj.jpg" alt="" width="1280" height="720" /> After surgery, young Mikolaj was bedridden and unable to walk, talk or eat on his own. He died less than a year later. “There was no hope. For a DIPG, there is no hope. So why give the false hope in the first place?” Mr Barman asked. Dr Teo has defended himself against these claims, explaining that there are some good and bad outcomes no matter the situation. “Once you start exploring and looking for advancements, you are going to get some bad outcomes, some terrible outcomes, which I have had,” he told <a href="https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/desperate-parents-heap-praise-on-lifesaving-neurosurgeon-charlie-teo/news-story/db2c86a0aae339a9f2a23b5dfa7cf530" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Daily Telegraph</a>. “You are also going to have patients that do very well, that get more months or years on their lives and get to enjoy life.” Images: Facebook/60 Minutes

Caring

"Let him do this job": Mother of Charlie Teo's "miracle girl" blasts surgery restrictions

The mother of Dr Charlie Teo's "miracle girl" has spoken out against the restrictions placed on the surgeon and how they will impact the lives of many families with sick kids. In 2019, Milli became one of Dr Teo's most well-known patients after he successfully removed 98 per cent of a brain tumour that had been dubbed inoperable and incurable by other surgeons. Although Milli tragically died in January 2021, her mother Monica said she feels “devastated” and “disappointed” over the restrictions placed on Dr Teo, saying it will greatly impact patients and their families who no longer have access to potentially lifesaving surgery. Since August 2021, Dr Teo has been barred from operating in Australia under rules imposed by the Medical Council of NSW. In order to operate, Dr Teo must have written approval from a second independent neurosurgeon with more than 20 years of specialist experience. These conditions will remain in place until September 30, when they will be subject to review. “Why? Just why? I wish they’d leave him alone and let him do this job. He helps people – that’s all he does,” Monica told <a href="https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/mum-of-dr-charlie-teos-miracle-girl-amelia-milli-lucas-says-operating-restrictions-have-robbed-australians/news-story/9fb19e4d6ab9b644e30ff03817d813b1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">news.com.au</a>. “I know the neurosurgeons in Australia think he’s a cowboy and think he takes things just that little bit extra … but that should be left to the patient to choose.” Dr Teo has has had daily requests from desperate patients to operate, as Monica said it should be up the patients to have final say over their treatment, and it’s an opportunity she’s grateful that her daughter had. “A neurosurgeon could go: ‘No, I’m not going to do it because in three months time it’s going to be back in and you’re going to be dead anyway’ but if someone wants to do it and live that three months, why aren’t they given that choice? Charlie gives you that choice,” she added. “He doesn’t mince his words and he doesn’t give anyone false hope, he just gives them real hope.” She also said the rules which have limited Dr Teo’s operating ability also “robbed” the “medical industry” and future research as well. Since the neurosurgeon has been barred from operating in Australia, Dr Teo has continued teaching, lecturing and performing pro bono surgery internationally. “I feel sorry for the people in Australia who want to be a neurosurgeon and aren’t able to learn from the best in the world.” Image credits: Facebook

Caring

Wave of support for Dr Charlie Teo

Renowned brain surgeon Dr Charlie Teo has received an outpouring of support from doctors overseas calling for his current restrictions on surgeries to be overturned. Dr Charlie Teo is not allowed to conduct any surgeries in Australia without written approval from a fellow surgeon after the Medical Council of NSW received three complaints about him. This has led to the 64-year-old coming out and saying to 2GB radio host Chris Smith that he would even perform surgeries for free in public hospitals, because he has “had enough” of the ban from “jealous colleagues”. “It's gang warfare. It's purely based on professional jealousy. Even a governing body has said that I'm a competent surgeon,” he said to Smith on air. He said that there have been multiple instances in which his receptionist would break down crying when people would beg for him to perform their surgery. “The bottom line is, it's a pretty desperate situation, it's sad, it's wrong,” Dr Teo continued. “It all started from nameless, faceless, cowardly people who went to the media, made allegations and made up stories about me to try and destroy my reputation. “If I'm as bad as surgeons say I am, if I'm offering people false hope and false promises, come out and say it... and put a face to the allegations.” His comments come as six top-performing doctors across the world wrote to the Medical Council of NSW calling for the ban to be overturned. Professor Giovanni Broggi, who worked for more than 40 years at the Neurological Institute Carlo Besta in Milan, said that Dr Teo’s willingness to perform risky operations and successfully is important to people and their families. “Given his excellent clinical results and great surgical skills in treating brain tumours, Professor Teo often accepts to operate on very complex cases,” Professor Broggi wrote. “This attitude, coupled with his ability to truly share the patient’s point of view, is what allowed him to save many patients. “Although he could not save the life of patients affected by malignant brain tumours, such as Glioblastomas, the truth is that in most of the cases he was able to significantly prolong patients’ survival and to provide a good post-operative quality of life.” Professor Paul Gardner from the Department of Neurological Surgery at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre said that Dr Teo’s emotional investment in each patient is what drives him to ensure he’s doing the best he can. “All of us who manage the most complex and dangerous cranial tumours face the constant risk and fear of devastating complications,” Professor Gardner wrote. “Indeed, the only way to avoid these in such cases is to never operate. “It is clear, however, based on the medical literature, that many of these disease have significantly better prognosis and outcome if a more radical removal can be performed. “It is exactly this tightrope that Prof Teo is willing and able to walk every day. “Any of us who attempt to do so will occasionally have devastating complications. This is the nature of our business.” “The emotional investment this requires cannot be overstated. I have seen Prof Teo invest this in every one of his patients I have seen treated and I have seen the impact on him when there is even a minor complication. “There is no question in my mind that he is offering every patient the highest level of care available in the world.” Stanford Medicines Associate Professor of Neurosurgery Robert Dodd also addressed the NSW Medical Council, calling for his colleague to be given permission to perform surgeries again. “I hope you are able to navigate through this investigation and find direction to see that Professor Teo is indeed a good and passionate physician, a master surgeon, and an Australian treasure,” he wrote. Dr Teo already had a name for himself in Australia, but it was when Amelia "Milli" Lucas, a 14-year-old from Perth who crowdfunded $170,000 to afford Dr Teo's services that he gained worldwide attention. He flew across the country to Sydney to perform Milli’s operation and successfully removed 98 percent of her life-threatening brain tumour with the experimental surgery. She was hailed Dr Teo's "miracle girl". Images: Facebook

Caring

Our Partners

Over 60

News

Shop

Catalogues

Contests

Entertainment

Travel

Health

Lifestyle

Finance

Property

Games

Information

Keep up to date

Search

Dr Charlie Teo's surprising next move after Aussie surgery restrictions

“You look like Nicolas Cage!”: Tiny Busselton store shocked by megastar’s visit

Mother of Charlie Teo's "miracle girl" shares more tragic news

Bombshell twist in split between Australia's richest couple

Charlie Teo's great walk of support

Dr Charlie Teo speaks out after guilty finding

What happens when doctors don’t act as they should? And what’s the ruling against neurosurgeon Charlie Teo?

Australia's richest couple call it quits

Charlie Teo’s fate after guilty finding

“I may as well give you the inside story”: Dr Charlie Teo unleashes on tribunal

Victoria Beckham's birthday snaps squash feud rumour

“We can let you rest now”: Devastating development in missing Nicola Bulley case

"If you want to kick him, come kick me too”: Stars turn out to defend Charlie Teo

“The agenda is to destroy Charlie Teo”: Final hit ahead of hearing

Karl Stefanovic forced to apologise for defending Dr Charlie Teo

"Shame on you!”: Dr Teo’s rumoured fiancée comes to his defence

“Absolute lie": Furious Charlie Teo hits back at 60 Minutes piece

Opinions divided over fresh Dr Charlie Teo claims

"Let him do this job": Mother of Charlie Teo's "miracle girl" blasts surgery restrictions

Wave of support for Dr Charlie Teo

Our Partners