Placeholder Content Image

Senior changes will to leave fortune to pets instead of family

<p>An elderly woman in China has decided to leave her $A4.3 million fortune to her pets instead of her three children, after she claims they never visited or took care of her when she was sick. </p> <p>The Shanghai woman, known by her last name Liu, drafted the will a few years ago according to the <a href="https://www.scmp.com/news/people-culture/trending-china/article/3248592/elderly-china-woman-leaves-us28-million-assets-beloved-pets-instead-children-who-never-visited-even" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>South China Morning Post</em></a>. </p> <p>However, as her three children rarely contacted her, and left her on her own while she was sick, Liu decided her cats and dogs were more deserving of her multi-million dollar fortune, and changed her will. </p> <p>Chen Kai, an official from the China’s Will Registration Centre headquarters, told her that leaving her entire inheritance to animals is illegal in China, but there is a way for her to ensure her pets get taken care of. </p> <p>“Liu’s current will is one way, and we would have advised her to appoint a person she trusts to supervise the vet clinic to ensure the pets are properly cared for,” he told the <em>South China Morning Post</em>. </p> <p>Another official added that Liu could always change her mind, if her children changed their attitude. </p> <p>“We told Auntie Liu that if her children change their attitude towards her, she could always alter her will again,” the official said. </p> <p><em>Image: Getty</em></p> <p> </p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

All of the incredible royal jewels Queen Mary just inherited

<p>In a weekend filled with regal splendour and historic significance, Crown Princess Mary of Denmark not only <a href="https://www.oversixty.com.au/lifestyle/family-pets/king-charles-message-to-mary-as-she-becomes-queen" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ascended to the esteemed title of Queen</a> but also found herself adorned with the resplendent Danish Crown Jewels.</p> <p>The symbolic transfer of these extraordinary treasures, formerly belonging to Queen Margrethe, marks a momentous chapter in the Danish monarchy, and for Mary, it's a journey into the rich history of royal glamour.</p> <p>The Danish Crown Jewels, a collection with a lineage spanning centuries, tell a story of devotion, legacy and timeless elegance. Initiated by Queen Sophie Magdalene in the 1700s, each subsequent queen has contributed to and enhanced the collection, resulting in four dazzling "parures", or sets, each a testament to the enduring craftsmanship and artistry of Danish royalty.</p> <p><strong>The Emerald Set: A Gift of Love Across Generations</strong></p> <p>At the heart of the collection is the Emerald Set, a masterpiece featuring diadem, necklace, brooch and earrings adorned with emeralds and brilliant-cut diamonds. Originally gifted to Queen Sophie Magdalene in 1723 by King Christian VI, the set exudes a captivating blend of history and sophistication. As Queen Margrethe has demonstrated in the past, the pieces can be worn together or detached for a versatile, regal allure.</p> <p><strong>Pearl Ruby Set: A Timeless Elegance in Red and White</strong></p> <p>The Pearl Ruby Set, with its origins in the late 1600s, boasts a pearl necklace from Queen Charlotte Amalie, complemented by a matching pearl, ruby and diamond brooch and earrings. The ensemble, enhanced by Queen Caroline Amalie in the 1840s, mirrors the colours of the Danish flag. The set's adaptability, such as the pendant attachment to the pearl necklace, reflects a harmonious blend of tradition and innovation.</p> <p><strong>Brilliant Set: Diamonds that Sparkle with History</strong></p> <p>The Brilliant Set, featuring a brilliant-cut diamond necklace, floral bouquet brooch and earrings dating back to 1840, was the choice of Queen Margrethe for her son Frederik's wedding. This set, rich in symbolism, is a dazzling testament to the enduring sparkle of Danish royalty. Paired with the Floral Aigrette tiara, it adds a touch of timeless grace to any royal occasion.</p> <p><strong>Rose Cut Set: A Delicate Affair with Rose-Cut Diamonds</strong></p> <p>The Rose Cut Set, with necklaces and brooches fashioned from rose-cut diamonds, whispers tales of Princess Charlotte Amalie from centuries past. Worn sparingly by Queen Margrethe, it holds a unique place in the collection, and its rare appearances evoke a sense of antiquity and refinement.</p> <p>For Queen Mary, this accession to the Danish Crown Jewels is not just a privilege but a responsibility to carry forward the legacy of elegance and grace. These jewels, worn by every Queen of Denmark since the 1700s, are not merely adornments; they are a connection to the nation's history and a symbol of continuity.</p> <p>Reserved for special occasions, such as state visits and the New Year Reception, the Danish Crown Jewels will now find a new muse in Queen Mary. Ensconced within the walls of Rosenborg Castle when not in use, these jewels remain a source of pride for Denmark, a tangible link to its regal past.</p> <p>As Queen Mary steps into this new chapter of her royal journey, the Danish Crown Jewels will undoubtedly witness many more moments of joy, solemnity and regal radiance, reflecting the enduring spirit of a nation intertwined with its royal heritage.</p> <p><em>Images: Instagram / Getty Images</em></p>

Money & Banking

Placeholder Content Image

Rod Stewart’s son blows through inheritance

<p>Rod Stewart’s son, Sean Stewart, has allegedly spent all of his inheritance in an attempt to rebrand his clothing line.</p> <p>A source told <em>Page Six Style</em> exclusively that Sean had “cashed out” the funds he would have received upon his father’s death in order to salvage the failing Dirty Weekend brand.</p> <p>“It’s insane because this is the third time I think he’s relaunching Dirty Weekend,” the source revealed. “Maybe third time’s the charm.”</p> <p>Reps for Sean and Dirty Weekend did not return <em>Page Six Style’s</em> requests for comment.</p> <p>In March, the son of the British rockstar posted about his company’s rebrand and credited artist Hector De Marquez for helping him with the relaunch.</p> <p>“Really proud of the work me and @hectordemarquez have put into rebranding dirty weekend,” the 42-year-old captioned the Instagram post.</p> <p>“Someone who finally sees my vision. What makes a successful business and entrepreneur is the team you have behind you.”</p> <p>The brand was originally launched in 2022.</p> <p>He also recently married his partner Jody Weintraub in Las Vegas on Valentine’s Day.</p> <p>He had known his now-wife, also 42, since high school. She is the daughter of late producer Jerry Weintraub.</p> <p>The pair eloped and made their way back to Los Angeles to celebrate the special day with the infamous musician and his ex-wife Alana Stewart, who is Sean’s mother.</p> <p>The British icon married Alana in 1979 but they divorced after five years.</p> <p>Stewart, 78, has been married to his current wife, Penny Lancaster, for 14 years.</p> <p>During Stewart’s 2023 Australian tour, the lovebirds <a href="https://www.oversixty.com.au/lifestyle/relationships/rod-stewart-s-secret-ceremony" target="_blank" rel="noopener">renewed their vows</a> in a secret ceremony.</p> <p><em>Image credit: Instagram</em></p>

Money & Banking

Placeholder Content Image

Aussies want their parents to spend their nest egg

<p dir="ltr">New research has found that most Australians would rather see their parents and grandparents spend their retirement savings than receive an inheritance. </p> <p dir="ltr">In the last 20 years, inheritances in Australia have totaled almost $1.4 trillion, averaging out to about $67 billion a year.</p> <p dir="ltr">The average inheritance is approximately $125,000 and goes to a recipient of about 50 years of age. </p> <p dir="ltr">The new report from CompliSpace has suggested a shift in attitudes for how Aussies think about inheritances, while also helping to bridge the aged care funding shortfall, which is set to increase. </p> <p dir="ltr">It is estimated that the Australian government spends approximately $24 billion each year on aged care, which is less than half of the global average. </p> <p dir="ltr">Melbourne woman Louise Lucas shared her attitudes on her parents spending their nest egg, telling <a href="https://www.9news.com.au/national/inheritance-values-changing-parents-urged-to-spend-not-leave-to-kids/3764f9cd-5287-4520-948a-e6de08ce2d1d">9news.com.au</a> she was “heartily all for” her parents leaving her nothing in their will, as long as they had a comfortable retirement. </p> <p dir="ltr">"I'm a mortgage broker and I've met a lot of retired people who are just hanging on and not living very well," she said.</p> <p dir="ltr">Louise went on to say that while it is better for older people to spend their money during their retirement years to live comfortably and stay active, it would also give the economy a boost. </p> <p dir="ltr">"Money's for experiences, you'd like to think, not things," she said.</p> <p dir="ltr">"If you've got more than $100,000 in the bank when you die, you've wasted your time and money."</p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

Retirement Income

Placeholder Content Image

Super has become a taxpayer-funded inheritance scheme for the rich. Here’s how to fix it – and save billions

<p>Australia’s A$3.3 trillion superannuation system is supposed to boost people’s retirement incomes. The government says as much in its <a href="https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-02/c2023-361383.pdf">proposed leglislated objective</a> for superannuation. The system is supported by billions of dollars of tax breaks each year, ostensibly to that end. </p> <p>But there’s just one problem – increasingly, much of what is saved is never spent.</p> <p>Our new report, <a href="https://grattan.edu.au/report/super-savings-practical-policies-for-fairer-superannuation-and-a-stronger-budget">Super savings: Practical policies for fairer superannuation and a stronger budget</a>, points out that without an overhaul, super tax breaks are set to do little more than boost the inheritances of Australians with well-off parents. </p> <p>Super contributions and super earnings are both taxed more lightly than other income. These tax breaks cost the budget about $45 billion (2% of Australia’s gross domestic product, or GDP) each year.</p> <p>Treasury predicts that figure will hit 3% of GDP by 2060, and that the cost of super tax breaks will overtake the cost of the age pension by as soon as 2036.</p> <p>Super tax breaks are also unfair: about two-thirds go to the top 20% of earners. </p> <p>This means the tax breaks provide the biggest boost to the super accounts of high earners, who will almost all have a comfortable retirement regardless, and who tend to save the same regardless of the tax rate imposed. </p> <p>The wealthiest 10% of Australians get a bigger boost to their retirement savings from super tax breaks than poorer Australians get from the age pension.</p> <p>But much of what is saved for retirement never actually gets spent in retirement. </p> <p>Earlier research by <a href="https://grattan.edu.au/news/balancing-act/">Grattan Institute</a> and the <a href="https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/p2020-100554-udcomplete-report.pdf">2020 Retirement Income Review</a> found that, for a variety of reasons, spending falls substantially during retirement. Retirees often end up leaving much of their nest egg untouched, bequeathing it to their children.</p> <p>This means billions of dollars in super tax breaks simply end up boosting the inheritances received by the children of well-off parents. It makes super a taxpayer-funded inheritance scheme. </p> <p>This problem is set to get worse. With the rate of compulsory superannuation legislated to rise from 10.5% of wages to 12% by 2025, future generations of retirees are set to retire with even larger nest eggs that they will never spend. </p> <p>Treasury projects that by 2059, one in every three dollars paid out of the super system will be a bequest, up from one in every five today.</p> <p>Big inheritances boost the jackpot from the birth lottery. They help richer children get richer. Among the Australians who received an inheritance over the past decade, the wealthiest fifth received on average <a href="https://grattan.edu.au/news/the-great-australian-nightmare/">three times</a> as much as the poorest fifth.</p> <p>To help reverse this, the government needs to rein in the super tax breaks.</p> <h2>How to make super fairer</h2> <p>The government’s policy, <a href="https://ministers.treasury.gov.au/ministers/jim-chalmers-2022/media-releases/superannuation-tax-breaks">announced in February</a>, of taxing the earnings on balances bigger than $3 million at 30%, instead of 15%, will help. </p> <p>But the threshold ought to be lowered to $2 million. Balances between $2 million and $3 million are very unlikely to be spent in retirement, so winding back tax breaks on earnings on balances bigger than $2 million would further wind back taxpayer-funded bequests. </p> <p>And there’s more. Currently, many wealthier Australians receive a larger tax break per dollar contributed to super than many low income earners. </p> <p>Yet low earners have more to be compensated for. Putting money into their super cuts their age pension in retirement, and they live shorter lives, meaning less time to enjoy their super in retirement.</p> <p>The pre-tax contributions of people earning more than $220,000 a year should be taxed at 35%, instead of the 30% charged to those earning more than $250,000 currently. That would still offer a 10% tax break on super contributions for high earners (given the top marginal rate of 45%) and at least a 15% break on the contributions of low and middle earners. </p> <p>And the annual pre-tax contributions cap should be lowered from $27,500 to $20,000. Contributions above this level tend to be made by people close to retirement with already-high balances.</p> <h2>Tax earnings in retirement the same as while working</h2> <p>On the earnings side, the tax-free earnings enjoyed by retirees on their first $1.7 million ($1.9 million from 1 July this year) of their super should go.</p> <p>Superannuation earnings in retirement should be taxed at 15%, the same as superannuation earnings before retirement. This would save the budget at least $5.3 billion a year, and much more in future, and make taxing super more simple.</p> <p>More than 70% of this revenue would come from the top 20% of retirees. The top 10% would pay an extra $7,000 to $7,500 a year on average, whereas the poorest half would no more than $200 more each.</p> <p>Both sides of politics say they agree that super shouldn’t be a taxpayer-funded inheritance scheme. But there’s a long way to go before that vision is reality.</p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p> <p><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://theconversation.com/super-has-become-a-taxpayer-funded-inheritance-scheme-for-the-rich-heres-how-to-fix-it-and-save-billions-202948" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Conversation</a>. </em></p>

Retirement Income

Placeholder Content Image

Fate of Graceland finally decided

<p>Reports have finally confirmed that the iconic Memphis, Tennessee estate, Graceland that famously belonged to Elvis will go to Lisa Marie Presley's daughters, following her death from cardiac arrest at 54 years of age.</p> <p>Elvis’ granddaughters will inherit the estate after ownership was called into question. Graceland was first passed down to Lisa Marie when she was just nine, following the death of her legendary father in 1977.</p> <p>Graceland will now be entrusted to Lisa Marie's daughters, actress Riley Keough, 33 and 14-year-old twins Finley and Harper Lockwood. Lisa Marie will also be honoured with a public memorial service at Graceland following her death.</p> <p>A representative Riley has said that "Riley, Harper, Finley, and Priscilla are grateful for the support, well-wishes, and outpouring of love honouring their beloved Lisa Marie. A public memorial service has been arranged on the front lawn of Graceland at 9:00 am on Sunday, January 22 in Memphis, Tennesee."</p> <p>Her final resting place will be at Graceland next to her son Benjamin, who sadly died by suicide in 2020.</p> <p>Riley is the daughter of Lisa Marie and her first husband, Danny Keough, who also tried to save her life after she went into full cardiac arrest the day she died.</p> <p>Finley and Harper are the daughters of Lisa Marie and her fourth husband, musician Michael Lockwood, who Lisa Marie officially split from in 2021.</p> <p>According to the official website of Graceland, the estate was left to Lisa Marie in trust when she was nine.</p> <p>The trust officially dissolved on her 25th birthday in 1993, which gave her full ownership of the home.</p> <p>Lisa Marie later formed The Elvis Presley Trust to manage the property alongside her mother, Priscilla Presley, and the National Bank of Commerce.</p> <p><em>Images: Wikipedia / Getty Images</em></p>

Real Estate

Placeholder Content Image

Almost half of Australians don’t know how to talk about inheritance

<p dir="ltr">It’s no secret that having conversations with family about money are often very awkward and difficult to have. </p> <p dir="ltr">However, when it comes to talking about inheritance, these are conversations that can’t be put off. </p> <p dir="ltr">New research has revealed that over 40 percent of Australis are yet to have important and proactive conversations with their loved ones about inheritance, despite 74 percent saying these conversations are necessary.</p> <p dir="ltr">Australia is currently in the midst of the biggest intergenerational wealth transfer in history, with baby boomers set to hand over $3.5 trillion to the next generation.</p> <p dir="ltr">Despite this, the new research shows that 20 percent of people don’t know how to broach the discussion with their families, even though 48 percent of people agree that having the conversation about a legacy before a person passes away will cause less conflict amongst beneficiaries.</p> <p dir="ltr">The research, commissioned by financial educator and communicator Vanessa Stoykov, reveals the compelling need for Australians to be confident and comfortable having conversations with family about money.</p> <p dir="ltr">“The time is now for Australians to become more financially literate and break down unhelpful beliefs about money and talking about it. This is about equipping ourselves with financial skills and independence,” says Ms Stoykov.</p> <p dir="ltr">“It can be tricky to navigate difficult conversations around money, but everyone needs to have a dialogue with their partners, parents, children and grandchildren. This is not just about whether someone is leaving money, but also the financial legacy that you pass on to your children," Ms Stoykov said.</p> <p dir="ltr">"Talking openly to them is a legacy and gift in itself.” </p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

Retirement Income

Placeholder Content Image

5 mistakes to avoid when leaving an inheritance

<p>Unlike virtually everything else in life, inheritance mistakes aren’t felt by the person who makes them. It’s those left behind who must deal with the fallout. What will your loved ones ultimately inherit? Estate planning. Wills. Inheritance.</p> <p>Nobody enjoys talking about these because they reflect our own mortality. Yet they have major ramifications for the loved ones we leave behind. Mistakes can be devastating. Thankfully, though, the most common inheritance mistakes are easily avoided. </p> <p><strong>Mistake #1: Failing to plan</strong></p> <p>A simple equation governs legal and money matters: failing to plan = planning to fail. Inheritances left to chance risk your wishes not being carried out. Disagreements between siblings and/or other benefactors become more likely – particularly if you are divorced/separated or have a blended family.</p> <p>Additionally, the government could wind up the biggest winner, with unclaimed assets seized by the state. The result? Benefits are wasted and relationships damaged – perhaps permanently.</p> <p><strong>Mistake #2: Set-and-forget</strong></p> <p>Sadly, I have seen this many times – someone’s ‘set-and-forget’ mindset meant their estate plans were outdated on their death, leaving behind significant question marks. Who inherits assets not covered in the will? What happens to assets left to someone who has already died? Do children born after the plans were drafted inherit at all? If you’ve been separated, outdated plans could see your ex become your primary beneficiary.</p> <p>Your grieving current partner could be forced to contest in court – and risk losing even more in legal fees – or miss out altogether. The same goes for divorced children and their ex. Treat your will like your garden – it should be tended regularly to be its best and allowed to grow and adapt to suit your changing circumstances.</p> <p><strong>Mistake #3: When a will won’t do</strong></p> <p>Wills cover many aspects – dividing money and assets; delegating custodianship of any children under 18 and how they will be provided for; and nominating the executor(s) of your estate. However, contrary to popular belief, a will is not the be all and end all.  Separate legal entities and certain financial assets are not covered by a will, including businesses, trusts and similar structures, and – crucially – superannuation. These require you to nominate your beneficiaries within those entities. Property can also be treated outside of a will, as joint tenants have an automatic right of survivorship. </p> <p>As tenants in common, you can gift your share to someone else, such as children. Remember though, if your partner still lives in the property but someone else inherits your share (especially if the two don’t get along), your partner could be pressured to move or sell – even if they have nowhere else to go.</p> <p><strong>Mistake #4: Hindering, not helping</strong></p> <p>While your intention may be to support family, you may inadvertently leave them worse off or see their benefits squandered if inheritances are poorly planned. For example, leaving property to someone who cannot afford the upkeep could be counterproductive. What if it can’t be sold? If they live in it and must sell, where will they go? Can they afford the same location?</p> <p>With taxes, will Capital Gains Tax be better managed if assets are sold from within your estate or once ownership is transferred? Will dividends/rental income push up their income tax? Will a super death benefit be taxable? Plus, many people don’t realise that under 18s income tax rates are higher than most adult tax rates.</p> <p><strong>Mistake #5: Failing your partner</strong></p> <p>Death inflicts enormous and often sudden change onto a surviving spouse or partner, if you have one. If not retired, they may need time off work to grieve and manage affairs. Funeral costs accumulate. Your income stops. Economies of scale (living costs are less per person for couples than for singles) disappear. They may be unable to look after themselves.</p> <p>Ask yourself:</p> <ul> <li>Do you have life insurance? Funeral cover?</li> <li>Is cash readily available for them to live on while your affairs are settled? </li> <li>What provisions are made for meeting mortgage repayments without your income?</li> <li>How much superannuation is left for their twilight years? </li> <li>Can they operate/sell the business if you’re self-employed?</li> <li>Do they need paid-for care?</li> </ul> <p>Inheritance is a complex business and that complexity compounds with the number of assets and beneficiaries. To ensure your wishes are implemented and your legacy is a positive one, I implore you – get good professional advice and make a thorough, up-to-date plan, one which works for both yourself and everyone set to inherit from it.</p> <p><strong><em>Helen Baker is a licensed Australian financial adviser and author of the new book, On Your Two Feet: The Essential Guide to Financial Independence for all Women (Ventura Press, $32.99). Helen is among the 1% of financial planners who hold a master's degree in the field. Proceeds from book sales are donated to charities supporting disadvantaged women and children. Find out more at <a href="https://onyourowntwofeet.com.au" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.onyourowntwofeet.com.au</a></em></strong></p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

Retirement Income

Placeholder Content Image

Surprise discovery shows you may inherit more from your mum than you think

<p>What if we could inherit more than our parents’ genes? What if we could inherit the ability to turn genes on and off?</p> <p>These possibilities have come to light after our <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-32057-x" target="_blank" rel="noopener">recent study</a>, published in Nature Communications. We found information in addition to our genes was passed down from mum to offspring to affect how their skeleton develops. That’s the “epigenetic” information that’s normally reset between generations.</p> <p>Our research was in mice, the first case of its kind in mammals where a long-lasting epigenetic effect from the mother’s egg is carried down to the next generation. This has lifelong consequences for that generation’s health.</p> <p>However, we cannot be certain the equivalent epigenetic changes are also inherited in humans, including the implications for how our skeleton develops and potential impact on diseases.</p> <h2>Hold up, what’s epigenetics again?</h2> <p>Our genes (packages of DNA) tell our body to make certain proteins. But our cells also need instructions to know whether a gene should be used (switched on) or not (switched off).</p> <p>These instructions come in the form of chemical or “epigenetic” tags (small molecules) that sit on top of the DNA. You accumulate these tags throughout your life.</p> <p>Think of how punctuation marks help a reader understand a sentence. Epigenetic tags allow the cell to understand a DNA sequence.</p> <p>Without these epigenetic tags, the cell might make a protein at the wrong time or not at all.</p> <p>Timing is crucial in how embryos develop. If certain genes are expressed (switched on to produce a protein) too early or too late, an embryo will not develop properly.</p> <h2>What did we find?</h2> <p>We were interested in understanding the function of a protein in mouse eggs (ova) called SMCHD1.</p> <p>By removing SMCHD1 from mouse eggs, we found mice that developed from eggs lacking SMCHD1 had an altered skeleton, with some vertebrae in the spine being disrupted.</p> <p>This could only be explained by an epigenetic change due to the loss of SMCHD1 in the egg.</p> <p>In particular, we looked at a set of genes known as Hox genes. These encode a series of proteins known to control how mammals’ skeletons develop.</p> <p>Hox genes are found in all animals, from flies to humans, and are crucial for setting up our spine. Evolution has finely tuned the timing of the expression of Hox genes during embryonic development to ensure the skeleton is assembled correctly.</p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> <p dir="ltr" lang="en">Happy to share that my first first author paper is out in <a href="https://twitter.com/NatureComms?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@NatureComms</a> showing that maternal SMCHD1 regulates Hox genes in the mouse embryo! Thanks to my PhD supervisors <a href="https://twitter.com/BlewittMarnie?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BlewittMarnie</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/Eddy_McGlinn?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Eddy_McGlinn</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Epigenetics?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Epigenetics</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/InHoxWeTrust?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#InHoxWeTrust</a> <a href="https://t.co/taYQmt1NAU">https://t.co/taYQmt1NAU</a> 1/n</p> <p>— Natalia Benetti (@nataliabenetti_) <a href="https://twitter.com/nataliabenetti_/status/1551709619361239040?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 25, 2022</a></p></blockquote> <p>Our study showed that epigenetic tags established by the mother’s SMCHD1 in her egg can impact how these Hox genes are expressed in her offspring.</p> <p>The findings are a big surprise because almost all epigenetic tags in the egg are erased shortly after conception. Think of this a bit like a factory reset.</p> <p>This means it’s unusual to have epigenetic information from the mother’s egg carried on to her offspring to shape how they grow.</p> <h2>What does this mean for us?</h2> <p>Our findings suggest even the genes you don’t inherit from your mother can still influence your development.</p> <p>This may have implications for the children of women with variants in their SMCHD1 gene. Variations in SMCHD1 cause human diseases such as a form of <a href="https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/conditionsandtreatments/muscular-dystrophy" target="_blank" rel="noopener">muscular dystrophy</a>.</p> <p>In the future, SMCHD1 might be a target for new medicines to alter how the protein functions and help patients with diseases caused by variations in SMCHD1. So it’s important to understand what consequences the disruption of SMCHD1 in the egg might have on future generations.</p> <h2>How about other diseases?</h2> <p>Scientists are now beginning to understand that the epigenetic tags added to our genes are sensitive to changes in the environment. This can mean environmental variations, such as our diet or level of physical activity, can affect how our genes are expressed. However, these changes do not alter the DNA itself.</p> <p>The epigenetic state undergoes the most changes when the egg is developing and during very early embryonic development, due to the “factory reset” between generations. This means the embryo is more vulnerable to epigenetic, including environmental, changes during this developmental window.</p> <p>As we discover more cases where epigenetic information is inherited from the mother, there may be instances where the diet or other environmental changes the mother experiences could impact the next generation.</p> <p>Given that scientists can now study what happens in a single egg, we are well placed to determine how that might happen and work out what exactly we could be inheriting.</p> <p><strong>This article originally appeared in The Conversation.</strong></p> <p><em>Image: Shutterstock</em></p>

Body

Placeholder Content Image

Pippa Middleton to gain noble inheritance

<p dir="ltr">Pippa Middleton could be joining her older sister Kate in royal life with a title of her own, inherited from her father-in-law.</p> <p dir="ltr">Her husband, James Matthews, is the eldest son of David Matthews, and is in line to inherit his father's title as Laird of Glen Affric, along with a 10,000-acre Scottish estate near Loch Ness.</p> <p dir="ltr">If he does receive the hereditary title upon his father's death, that would see Pippa and James become Lord and Lady Glen Affric.</p> <p dir="ltr">The Commonwealth-recognised title would make the couple members of the nobility, one step down from royalty.</p> <p dir="ltr">Pippa and James, a former professional racing driver and hedge fund manager, married in 2017 and share three children: Arthur, three, Grace, one, and three-week-old Rose.</p> <p dir="ltr">The news of their future title comes as the family reportedly plan to relocate to a 31-hectare lot in Buckleberry, less than an hour’s drive from the Middleton’s new home in Windsor.</p> <p dir="ltr">Their new home will reportedly mimic Jeremy Clarkson’s Diddly Squat Farm Shop, complete with glamping, cabins and a restaurant. </p> <p><span id="docs-internal-guid-e84dce1d-7fff-7ae3-1e08-e3412ea596e7"></span></p> <p dir="ltr">Kate and Pippa’s parents, Michael, 73, and Carole, 67, also live in Buckleberry, which has been a long-time base for the family and where they founded a party accessory company in 1987.</p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image: @pippa.middleton.matthews (Instagram)</em></p>

Beauty & Style

Placeholder Content Image

How an Aussie senior inherited her long-term home from her landlord

<p dir="ltr">An Australian senior has finally been able to retire after she received an incredible gift from her long-term landlord. </p> <p dir="ltr">Jane Sayner, 74, was used to a life of waking up to her 3am alarm to go and work at a fruit and vegetable market in Epping in order to pay her rent and make ends meet. </p> <p dir="ltr">However, Jane has now been able to turn off her early morning alarm for good after inheriting her home from her late landlord. </p> <p dir="ltr">Jane rented off St Albans multi-millionaire John Perrett, who famously left his $18-million fortune to the Royal Melbourne Hospital when he died in 2020.</p> <p dir="ltr">Mr Perrett was the local pharmacist in the suburb of Melbourne, but made his riches through clever investing, all while continuing to live humbly in the neighbourhood.</p> <p dir="ltr">While the majority of his generous donation to the hospital has gone towards technology and research in the renal department that delivered him a kidney transplant, his philanthropic nature wanted to ensure Ms Sayner did not have to worry about finding a new place during her own health battle.</p> <p dir="ltr">After renting the two-bedroom St Albans unit for 23 years, Jane was shocked to receive a call from her landlord before he died after a battle with Parkinson’s. </p> <p dir="ltr">While the pair were on good terms, Perrett’s offering was next level, as he left the home to Jane. </p> <p dir="ltr">Mr Perrett also left another property to another tenant in St Albans, while another flat he owned similar to Jane’s was sold for about $400,000 to go towards the hospital donation. </p> <p dir="ltr">Jane paid $250 a week in rent, which barely rose over the last two decades, and would never have been able to afford anything like what she had if her home had been sold following her landlord’s death. </p> <p dir="ltr">Instead of still having to wake up at 3am to work at the market full-time, Jane now enjoys the simple life of a retiree as she tends to her garden and dreams of travelling to Canada. </p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image credits: realestate.com.au</em></p>

Real Estate

Placeholder Content Image

Man ordered to repay $201,000 “inheritance” to the bank

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A grandfather has been left shocked by his bank, after they have ordered him to repay $201,000.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Russell Alexander, 54, contacted Barclay’s Bank after huge sums of money were deposited into his account. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Confused by the large sum, he reached out to Barclay’s and got no reply. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Eventually, representatives from the bank told Russell that the money was part of an inheritance and to keep it, he told </span><a href="https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/16694791/handyman-renovated-home-barclays-mistake/"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Sun</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">He used the money to renovate a fixer-upper house he purchased after his divorce, and could now make more expensive changes to his renovation project. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">However, nine months after the money first hit Russell’s account, Barclay’s realised they had made a mistake and took all the money back, including an extra $11,000 of Russell’s own money. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Due to the brash withdrawal of funds, Russell has been left living in a semi-derelict home with no heating, and no money to improve his situation. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Barclay’s admitted that the money was transferred to Russell by accident, and he was “incorrectly advised that he could keep the funds”.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Russell said, “I’m totally outraged at their offer of £500 ($A1000) compensation.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“I’ve been a loyal customer for 40 years and they clearly told me twice the money was mine to spend.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“I planned to renovate the house to rent out rooms on Airbnb, but I’ll need to work now to earn the money and it will take years.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“I never would have bought it if I didn’t have the extra money.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Barclays have stolen my future plans and left me living like a stowaway.”</span></p> <p><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Image credits: Shutterstock</span></em></p>

Money & Banking

Placeholder Content Image

How much do you need to retire comfortably?

<p><span>Calculating how much money you’ll need for your retirement can be difficult because you need to take a number of factors into account including how much money you have now, how long it will last you and what your plans are for your future.</span></p> <p>The other factors you need to take into account include your lifestyle and the number of years you’ll spend retired.</p> <p>Additionally, estimating how much you’ll have when you plan to retire depends on factors such as your current salary, super balance and assets. With so many factors, it’s easy to see why you might need a retirement calculator to get an idea of your retirement savings needs.</p> <p>Companies such as AMP have <a href="https://www.amp.com.au/retirement/calculator/retirement-calculator">retirement calculators</a> on their sites and you can use these to get an indication of whether there’s a shortfall between how much you are estimated to have and how much you’ll need in retirement, and put a plan in place to address the situation.</p> <p><strong>How much is enough for retirement?</strong></p> <p>The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) estimates that Australians aged around 65 who own their own home and are in relatively good health, will need between $535 and $837 per week for one person and between $774 and $1186 per week for a couple.</p> <p>The lower amount will be for a more modest lifestyle but this is still better than living on the <a href="https://www.amp.com.au/retirement/prepare-to-retire/retirement-pension-types">age pension</a>. While the higher amount would be for a more comfortable lifestyle with a broad range of leisure and recreational activities – including domestic and international travel.</p> <p>For Australians on above-average incomes, another rule of thumb to estimate how much money you’ll need in retirement is to assume you will require 67% (two-thirds) of your pre-retirement income to maintain the same standard of living.</p> <p><strong>What are your retirement lifestyle expectations?</strong></p> <p>Ultimately, how much money you'll need for your own retirement is very personal, and will depend on your own situation, wants, needs and lifestyle expectations. It may help to factor in your day-to-day spending habits, your recreational activities and hobbies and whether you’ll be entering retirement debt-free.</p> <p><strong>How long will you work for?</strong></p> <p>The age at which you retire can have a significant impact on how much money you have and how much money you need in retirement. It can depend on factors such as your health, debts, super balance, age you can access your super, whether you have dependants and your partner’s retirement plans (if you have one).</p> <p><strong>How long will you be retired?</strong></p> <p>Keep in mind if you're planning to retire at around the age of 65, it’s likely you’ll live for another 20 years or so. Men aged 65 can expect to live to 84.6 years, while women can expect to live to 87.3 years.</p> <p><strong>How much money will you have in retirement?</strong></p> <p>The money you use to fund your life in retirement will likely come from a range of different sources including the following:</p> <p><strong>Superannuation</strong></p> <p>Knowing your super balance is a crucial part of planning for retirement because it's likely to form a substantial part of your retirement savings.</p> <p><strong>The age pension</strong></p> <p>Depending on your circumstances and assets, you could be eligible for a full or part age pension or alternatively, you may not be eligible for government assistance at all. Check up on this by <a href="http://www.yourpension.com.au/APCalc/">visiting this age pension site</a> which has a calculator and you can ascertain your eligibility.</p> <p><strong>Investments, savings and inheritance</strong></p> <p>You may be planning to downsize your house, sell shares or an investment property, or use money you’ve saved in a savings account or term deposit to contribute to your retirement. Or perhaps an inheritance or the proceeds from your family’s estate may help you out in your later years. So these will all need to be taken into account.</p> <p><strong>How retirement calculators can help</strong></p> <p>If you use one of the <a href="https://secure.amp.com.au/ddc/public/ui/retirement-needs/">retirement calculators</a> available online, you can work out how much you’ll need in your retirement.</p> <p>Often when you go through all the steps of using a retirement calculator, it shows you how much you’ll need to fund your entire retirement and sometimes this points to a shortfall.</p> <p>While this news may seem scary, it’s not an uncommon situation. Luckily, finding out about the possible shortfall now means there may still be ways to boost your savings before retirement.</p> <p><span><strong>What do you do if you won’t have enough to retire?</strong></span></p> <p>If you find you’re facing a shortfall in retirement, there are several things you can do to get your retirement on track. You could consider boosting your super through additional contributions, delaying your retirement, adjusting your retirement lifestyle expectations, or selling other assets.</p> <p>Simply by having an idea of your current and projected retirement savings, thanks to using retirement calculators, you can work out a plan to improve your situation. The earlier you start, the easier it may be for you to reach your retirement goals.</p> <p><em>Image: Getty Images</em></p> <p><em> </em></p> <p><em> </em></p> <p><em> </em></p> <p><em> </em></p>

Retirement Income

Placeholder Content Image

Elizabeth Hurley speaks out against her son’s grandfather

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Elizabeth Hurley has spoken out against her son Damian’s paternal grandfather, releasing a statement criticising the decision to prevent the 19-year-old from inheriting an expected $330 million AUD (or $354 million NZD) from his family trust.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Damian’s father, Steve Bing, died by suicide in 2020 at 55. He and Hurley dated between 2001 and 2002.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Steve Bing’s father and Damian’s paternal grandfather, multimillionaire Dr Peter Bing, made an appeal against Damian and his half-sister, Kira Kerkorian, to receive a share of Steve Bing’s fortune as they were born out of wedlock.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In a statement made to </span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Daily Mail</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;"> over the weekend, Hurley said she was hurt by Dr Bing’s decision, especially after Steve had won a court battle overturning Dr Bing’s attempt to exclude Damian and Kira from the family trust before his death.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“When Stephen took his own life, he died thinking his children were going to be taken care of,” Hurley said in the statement.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Stephen fought very hard in his last year to have his children recognised and repeatedly told me how incredibly important it was to him.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“What Stephen wanted has not been callously reversed. I know Stephen would have been devastated.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Although Damian reportedly didn’t have a relationship with Steve growing up, Steve called Damian and expressed hopes of building a relationship with him on the then 18-year-old’s birthday, according to Hurley.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">On the anniversary of his father’s death, Damian shared a tribute on Instagram, saying the “last year has been bloody hard”.</span></p> <blockquote style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/CQbk0n3l9kA/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="13"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CQbk0n3l9kA/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank">A post shared by Damian Hurley (@damianhurley1)</a></p> </div> </blockquote> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“He was happy beyond belief that the trial verdict ruled that Damian was to be treated like his sister’s children as far as the trust was concerned,” the </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Austin Powers</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"> star continued in her statement.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“I am just relieved that Stephen will never know that Damian’s relatives - Stephen’s father and the family of his sister Mary - were ultimately successful in their appeal against the original trial verdict.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Kira’s mother, former professional tennis player Lisa Bonder, also contributed to the statement.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“As a mum, I wonder why on earth this had to happen. Why make two innocent kids into victims?” Bonder said.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Following the court’s decision, Steve’s fortune will be split between his sister Mary’s two children, Anton Ellis and Lucy Ellis.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Steve, who founded Shangri-La Entertainment, inherited his fortune when he was 18 from his grandfather, who was a real-estate mogul.</span></p> <p><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Image: Elizabeth Hurley / Instagram</span></em></p>

Money & Banking

Placeholder Content Image

Princess Diana’s nephew set to inherit fortune

<p>Louis Spencer is set to one day inherit his family’s incredible historic estate.</p> <p>27-year-old Louis is the youngest son of Charles Spencer, and yet he is still heir to his father’s earldom thanks to England’s primogeniture rules.</p> <p>These archaic set of laws sees that titles are passed down to firstborn sons.</p> <p>His inheritance will include the Althorp estate, where Louis' late aunty Princess Diana lived from the age of seven until her marriage to Prince Charles.</p> <p>It also the place where the royal is buried.</p> <p>Louis' sister Lady Kitty Spencer recently addressed the issue of primogeniture while speaking to<span> </span><em>Town and Country</em>, calling it a "tricky" topic.</p> <p>"[A]s times are changing, attitudes are as well," she said.</p> <p><img style="width: 500px; height: 281.25px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7841339/daily-3.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/bdf7155d1db74b62bb226ab766f991c9" /></p> <p>"I'm relaxed about it, because I know that it's all out of everyone's hands. As it stands, it's Louis to inherit, and Louis will do an incredible job."</p> <p>Louis' status as the Spencer heir, along with being the first cousin to Prince William and Prince Harry are both major reasons as to why he's considered one of</p> <p> the world's most eligible royals.</p> <p>In 2019,<span> </span><em>Tatler</em><span> </span>magazine included him in a list of unmarried men from royal families that included Denmark's Prince Nikolai, Prince Mateen of Brunei and Prince Constantine Alexios of Greece.</p> <p>Louis, whose title is Viscount Althorp, is the fourth child and only son of Charles Spencer and his first wife, Victoria Lockwood.</p> <p>His older sisters are Lady Kitty and twins Lady Amelia and Lady Eliza.</p> <p>While he and his sisters prefer to lead a relatively private life, the family made headlines when they were guests at Harry's wedding to Meghan Markle at Windsor Castle in 2018.</p>

Money & Banking

Placeholder Content Image

Who will inherit the Duke of Edinburgh title?

<p dir="ltr">Following the news of Prince Philip’s passing comes a change in who holds which royal title, but this won’t come into effect until Prince Charles takes the throne.</p> <p dir="ltr">Prince Edward, Philip and Queen Elizabeth’s fourth child and current Earl of Wessex, will eventually claim his late father’s title as the Duke of Edinburgh.</p> <p dir="ltr">His wife, Sophie, will become the Duchess of Edinburgh and the fourth woman to hold the title since its creation in 1726.</p> <blockquote style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/CKllqcPHuz-/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="13"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CKllqcPHuz-/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank">A post shared by The Royal Family (@theroyalfamily)</a></p> </div> </blockquote> <p dir="ltr">After Prince Philip’s death on April 9, Charles now holds the Duke of Edinburgh title according to the rules around the line of succession. This also means that his wife and Duchess of Cornwall, Camilla, is now regarded as the Duchess of Edinburgh.</p> <p dir="ltr">Once he becomes king, the title will be passed down to his youngest brother.</p> <p dir="ltr">This goes against the Letters Patent issued by George VI, which gave Philip the title in 1947 and stipulated the duke’s eldest son would inherit the title.</p> <p dir="ltr">But, when Charles becomes king the title can be re-granted to Edward.</p> <p dir="ltr">The decision to appoint Edward as the eventual Duke of Edinburgh was announced in 1999, following his marriage to Sophie Rhys-Jones and adoption of the title of Earl of Wessex.</p> <p dir="ltr">As a trustee and Chairman of the Duke of Edinburgh Award program, Edward’s succession as the Duke of Edinburgh also recognises his commitment to the program.</p> <p dir="ltr">The Duke of Edinburgh Award program, one of Philip’s educational initiatives, has been undertaken by over eight million children globally and involves pursuing a well-rounded education through acts of service, physical activity, camping trips, and personal hobbies.</p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Why Queen Mother left a much bigger inheritance for Harry

<p><span>Princess Diana split her fortune right down the middle when it came to her two sons, Harry and William – however the Queen Mother thought very differently.</span><br /><br /><span>Then the royal passed away five years after the late Di, Prince Harry inherited a substantially larger amount of his great grandmother’s £14 million ($25 million) fortune than his older brother Prince William.</span><br /><br /><span>Considering Prince William is second in line to the throne, Queen Elizabeth’s mother wanted to protect her younger grandson, and guarantee him financial stability in the future.</span><br /><br /><span>When Prince Charles becomes King, Prince William will inherit his role as the Prince of Wales meaning he will take over the Duchy of Cornwall and all the private estates that come along with it.</span><br /><img style="width: 500px; height: 281.25px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7840530/queen-mother-2.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/043a1a952ad64d95b349ee2f0caab7d6" /><br /><span>Prince Harry, however, will get nothing, as the second son.</span><br /><br /><span>It’s unknown how much exactly Harry inherited but a 2002 report by the BBC claimed that the “bulk” of her £14 million estate went to the Duke of Sussex “since William will benefit financially by becoming king.”</span><br /><br /><span>The Queen Mother effectively gave Harry financial compensation to make up for the line of succession.</span><br /><br /><span>When the Queen Mother died in 2002, she left her estate (which typically refers to the contents of her homes) to her daughter.</span></p> <p><img style="width: 500px; height: 281.25px;" src="https://oversixtydev.blob.core.windows.net/media/7840529/queen-mother-3.jpg" alt="" data-udi="umb://media/bdfd76be82004526a9792240297a2911" /><br /><br /><span>She was an avid art connoisseur as well, and the majority of her vast collection of Monet paintings were donated to the Royal Collection and were put on display at Buckingham Palace.</span></p> <p><em>Images: Getty</em></p>

Family & Pets

Our Partners