Placeholder Content Image

“What do I actually do?”: Woman’s costly chocolate-coated crisis

<p>A woman in the United States has been left with quite the mess on her hands after her cake order took a questionable - and rather expensive -  turn. </p> <p>In a video posted to TikTok, by user @libbycarlsonn, she revealed what had become of her $300 USD (~$443 AUD/NZD) request after it had been dropped off by the baker.</p> <p>The clip featured her with a hand covering her face and the text “guys I paid $300 for this and the lady just dropped it off what do I actually do” across the top of the screen. </p> <p>It continued on to show an image of a carefully constructed chocolate cake, the one that the TikToker had been hoping to receive, and concluded with what she’d actually been delivered: something best described as a sort of chocolate avalanche, with chocolate melting down haphazardly placed chunks of cake, and a dusting of sprinkles over it all. </p> <p>“TikTok, work your magic because I need advice right now," her caption read. </p> <p>The video gained over 3.7m views, and over 4,000 comments, though most weren’t offering advice so much as commiserating with her, or poking fun at the sillier side of her situation, and many were of the opinion that she should demand a refund immediately. </p> <p>“When you say dropped it off, did she literally drop it?” one user wanted to know. “Also how is that the same as the one in the photo??? HOW?”</p> <p>Another pressing concern came soon after, with someone asking “why are there sprinkles???”</p> <p>“Put it in the fridge probably just melted a bit,” one suggested. </p> <p>“No way that’s what they gave you!! I would’ve flip[ped] that cake onto their face. Wow!!” another said. </p> <p>“Tbf…. I prefer the disaster cake,” one shared, “it looks tastier but I’d definitely ask for a refund.”</p> <p>Another felt quite strongly about that, telling the TikToker “well obviously it's false advertising and that's illegal”.</p> <p>One, however, simply refused to accept that the story was true, writing “I’m sorry I literally do not believe you”.</p> <p>“Girl you made that. Quit playing! Lol,” another agreed. </p> <p>And as one said, “honestly, there’s no way this is true or you dropped it before posting.”</p> <p><em>Images: TikTok</em></p>

Food & Wine

Placeholder Content Image

"You can’t park there, bro”: Perth valet smashes TWO lambos in costly mistake

<p>A valet driver at the Crown Hotel in Perth has found himself in hot water after smashing two Lamborghinis while trying to park one.</p> <p>The luxury vehicles belonged to billionaire Laurence Escalante and both were damaged after they collided in the hotel driveway, a spokesperson for Crown Perth said.</p> <p>Footage captured and shared by Jiu-Jitsu athlete Craig Jones shows the valet driver behind the wheel of a blue Lamborghini Aventador Ultimae, a car valued upward of $940,000, smashing into the rear of a purple Lamborghini.</p> <p>“Help! I’ve really f***ed it up.” The driver said in the footage before running out to assess the damage.</p> <blockquote class="instagram-media" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/reel/Coa-BoPDhZS/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"> </div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;"> <div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: 8px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"> </div> </div> <div style="margin-left: auto;"> <div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"> </div> <div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"> </div> </div> </div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"> </div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"> </div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/Coa-BoPDhZS/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Craig Jones (@craigjonesbjj)</a></p> </div> </blockquote> <p>In response to the crash, the driver claimed he was “trying to park it just like everybody else,” adding that the pedals were “too close together.” He then claimed he thought he was pressing the brake but instead hit the accelerator, causing him to crash into the rear of the purple Lamborghini.</p> <p>The owner of the luxury vehicles appeared to have witnessed the collision and could be heard questioning the driver.</p> <p>“What are you doing?” Jones said. "He moved it right in his rear ... you can’t park there, bro," he added.</p> <p>A spokesperson for Crown Resorts confirmed the accident is still under investigation, also informing the media there were “no injuries sustained.”</p> <p>"The safety of Crown’s team members and guests remains our priority," they said in a statement to News.com.au. "We are conducting a full assessment of the incident together with those involved.”</p> <p>The Crown is "working positively with us to fix the cars and put this behind us all,” a spokesperson for Mr Escalante told The West Australian. "We appreciate accidents happen and most importantly no one was injured," they said.</p> <p>A similar incident occurred in Sydney in 2018 when a valet driver parked a Porsche Carrera underneath another vehicle. As the driver attempted to park the Porsche, the car reportedly accelerated and ended up under a Sports utility vehicle (SUV).</p> <p>Police were notified and had to cut the driver, who was left unharmed, out of the vehicle.</p> <p><em>Images: Instagram / @craigjonesbjj</em></p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

Battle of wills is costly and rarely delivers

<p>There's nothing quite so grubby and unseemly as adult children battling over the last will and testament of a parent but such bitter skirmishes are constantly being fought through the courts.</p> <p>A will, properly done, is no guarantee against a legal challenge from a family member who feels they have not been left a fair slice of the family wealth.</p> <p>But courts tend to respect the wishes of testators to leave their wealth to whomever or whatever they wish, as long as they have not breached their “moral duty” to family members (for example entirely excluding one of three children without good reason or promising to leave something to a carer and then not doing so) or have failed to provide adequately for young children.</p> <p>It does appear a fair number of wills are made in people's dying days, often varying earlier wills as they ponder how they want to dispose of their worldly wealth.</p> <p>While it's always tempting to draw conclusions from a limited number of cases, it is hard not to theorise that wills drawn up in dying days are more likely to be challenged under the notion the writer lacked mental capacity, or that they were more susceptible to undue influences.</p> <p>But while these challenges may be costly to the estate - and enriching to lawyers - case law shows that mere unfairness will not be overturned by the courts, and that courts will only do the minimum needed to remedy any “breach of moral duty”.</p> <p>And, to quote one judgment, just because a judge “sitting in the testator's armchair” might see the matter differently, does not mean they should rewrite a will.</p> <p><strong>A good will can be challenged</strong></p> <p>Testators cannot be sure their will won't be challenged even if they make small bequests to recognise their moral duties to all their issue and justify their decisions in writing - something Public Trust asks testators to do. This tends to include citing the help given to family members in life. In one case a woman left most of her wealth to her granddaughter, who she had raised and who had looked after her later in life.</p> <p>The woman's two sons chose to challenge the will, which left one nothing (he had been helped financially in his parents' lives and had later squabbled over money with his mother) and the other a token amount. The brothers lost the legal tussle.</p> <p><strong>Mother cut out of daughter's will</strong></p> <p>One case involved the unusual situation of a mother seeking to have the will of her daughter altered. The daughter, dying of cancer, changed her will as she neared death, leaving all her money to friends, the Cancer Society and the hospice that was caring for her. The mother, included in a previous will, alleged her daughter lacked the mental capacity to make a will and also that “undue influence” had been brought to bear on her by a friend who inherited from the will. The allegations were backed by no evidence. Besides, the daughter had shown she had thought about her mother in notes stating that her mother was now financially independent.</p> <p><strong>Getting the sums right</strong></p> <p>In life a testator helped his son buy the family farm. When he died, his son's debts were forgiven, thereby passing the farm entirely to his son.</p> <p>The residual estate was then to be split among his other two children, both daughters.</p> <p>That meant the daughters got much less than the son, whose farm they believed was now worth about $10 million in part due to significant capital gains.</p> <p>The daughters challenged the will but the court said they could not maintain there had been a moral breach as both were left sums of about $300,000, even though there was written evidence the testator and his wife understood they put in place "arrangements which would give our three children an approximate equal share of our estates”.</p> <p>Unfortunately, their desires were not achieved in the legal documents. It appears the testator's professional advisers may not have done a good job.</p> <p><strong>Abusive son</strong></p> <p>A man who challenged his parents' will, in which he was left $70,000 of their $400,000 estate, got nothing more despite claims he deserved a half share.</p> <p>The man had Asperger's Syndrome but the judge decided the abusive way he treated his parents was only partly a result of the syndrome. The judge found the parents had treated the man well but that he had been abusive - documents were quoted in the judgment including one telling his parents to "f... off out of my life" - and that the relationship had been a “one-way street”. They had also given him $50,000 to pay off debts before they died and while they had considered cutting the son out of the will entirely, they had not. They had not, therefore, failed in their moral duty to him.</p> <p><em>Written by Rob Stock. First appeared on <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/" target="_blank"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stuff.co.nz</span></strong></a>.</em></p> <p><em>Any advice contained in this communication is general advice only. None of the information provided is, or should be considered to be, personal financial advice.</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Migraine patients set to save hundreds after costly drug revision

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The addition of migraine-preventing medication to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) has been hailed as a step in the right direction by advocacy groups.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Emgality is used to prevent migraines in adults and is injected once a month by the patient.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">It can cost up to $1000 a month, but from June 1 eligible individuals will pay just $41.30 a script or $6.60 if they are a concession holder.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Raphaella Crosby, the founding member of patient advocacy group Migraine Australia said the addition of the treatment to the PBS is a step in the right direction but that there’s still more work to do.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“It does kind of pave the way because now that we’ve got one of these new medications on the PBS, there’s not much argument for listing the other ones,” Ms Crosby said.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">However, Ms Crosby said the number of people eligible for treatment would be limited by strict criteria.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">To be eligible, a person must meet the definition of suffering from chronic migraines, be under the care of a neurologist, have tried three older medications that failed, and not have received botox (a common treatment for migraines) under the PBS.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“The line between episodic and chronic migraine is nonsense, it’s an arbitrary line that somebody drew at some point. It has no clinical meaning,” Ms Crosby said.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">According to research by Deloitte Access Economics in 2018, 4.9 million Australians live with migraines.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Migraines disproportionately affect women as well, with 45 percent of women aged between 25 and 45 living with very active migraines that affect their ability to work, Ms Crosby said.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“When the government talks about getting women back to work, to deny these drugs to women who aren’t completely debilitated by them is a bit counterproductive,” she said.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Because essentially what the restrictions are saying is ‘you need to be completely debilitated by your migraine before we’ll give you something that works’.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Emgality, made by pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly, belongs to a group of medications that block a particular protein associated with migraines, called calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP).</span></p>

Body

Placeholder Content Image

Coles staff rescue woman from costly scam

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The quick-thinking actions of a Coles employee and manager has saved a customer from losing hundreds in a sophisticated gift card scam.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Perth shopper shared the story on Twitter, recounting that she was attempting to buy $700 worth of gift cards at Coles when she was intercepted by two staff members.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The customer was asked to buy the gift cards by someone impersonating her boss.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">It wasn’t until she spoke to Coes staff that she realised she was the “victim of a scam”.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Someone impersonated my CEO and told me to purchase $700 worth of gift cards,” she wrote on Twitter.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Luckily I was stopped by the friendly staff member and store manager of Coles and was handed the #ScamAlert leaflet. I’ve reported this to @CyberGovAU.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Coles leaflet alerts shoppers to the dangers of the scam described on Facebook as the gift card “boss scam”.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Are you being scammed? Have you been told to buy gift cards to pay a ‘debt’ or emailed to buy them as ‘staff rewards’?” the leaflet reads.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“The Australian government and legitimate businesses will NEVER demand payment with iTunes, Google Play, Steam or other gift cards and the email is not really from your boss.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Please do not provide the card numbers to the caller.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The leaflet encourages anyone suspecting they are a victim of a scam to contact a Coles manager, the police, or Scam Watch.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A Coles spokesperson told 7NEWS.com.au that the supermarket had seen a spike in gift card scams recently.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Coles has seen an increase in gift card scams reported to Coles Customer Care, including instances where customers have been pressured into bulk purchasing iTunes gift cards or other gift cards to pay fake debts or fines,” the spokesperson said.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“We have introduced a notification at the checkout that activates after five gift cards are scanned as a warning to customers bulk purchasing.”</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The supermarket has also trained their staff to look for customers spending significant amounts of money on gift cards and notify the store manager or ask the customer if they knew about the scams.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Coles has also added an ongoing message onto our in-store Coles Radio as further awareness to customers about potential gift card scams.”</span></p>

Money & Banking

Placeholder Content Image

Oatlands tragedy: Family faces costly medical bills after no access to Medicare

<div class="post_body_wrapper"> <div class="post_body"> <div class="body_text "> <p>Rania Geagea Kassas is dealing with every parent’s nightmare as she begged people to pray for her son who has been in a coma for over a week.</p> <p>Earlier this month, the young boy was walking with his cousins to get ice cream when an alleged drunk driver mounted the footpath and hit the children.</p> <p>The child suffered critical injuries to his head and spine and was placed in an induced coma.</p> <p>Sadly, he is yet to realise that the accident took the lives of his four cousins and best friends; Antony, Angelina and Sienna Abdallah and Veronique Sakr.</p> <p>“He needs your prayers now,” his mother told<span> </span><em>10 News First</em>.</p> <p>“I think he is happy with his cousins like he is in heaven, and then he’s going to come back after the funeral and he’s going to tell us about … his trip.”</p> <p>The three Abdallah children were laid to rest in a beautiful ceremony held at the Maronite Catholic rite at Our Lady of Lebanon Co-Cathedral in Harris Park yesterday.</p> <p>Two more children were injured in the crash, but they have since been discharged from hospital and being taken care of by their family.</p> <p>The boy remains in the intensive care unit at Sydney’s Westmead Children’s Hospital. He is in a stable condition and is in an induced coma and is being monitored every two to three hours.</p> <p>His uncle, Anthony Geagea revealed that he could remain in a coma for up to six months and they won’t know just how much damage has been caused to his brain and spine until after he wakes up.</p> <p>“When he wakes up, the doctor will give us a full diagnosis,” he said.</p> <p>Currently, the driver’s Compulsory Third Party (CTP) insurance will cover the immediate hospital bills but the family’s neighbour has set up a<span> </span><a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.gofundme.com/f/team-charbel-kassas" target="_blank">GoFundMe</a><span> </span>page to help ease the financial burden once the boy has woken up.</p> <p>His parents do not have access to Medicare as they’ve only been in Australia for a short time.</p> <p>“All medical expenses are out of pocket and will increase dramatically,” says the fundraising page.</p> <p>“Any donation made towards this beautiful humble family is greatly appreciated.”</p> <p>The boy’s parents have not been able to return to work, and won’t be able to for some time as he needs full-time care.</p> <p>“We don’t know what is going to happen – maybe he will need medicine, maybe he will need lots of equipment,” said his mother.</p> <p>So far, close to $130,000 have been raised as they attempt to reach their $150,000 goal.</p> </div> </div> </div>

Caring

Placeholder Content Image

Cruise couple's costly mistake leaves them stranded in foreign country

<p>Kevin Rohrer and his girlfriend were enjoying their Caribbean adventure as they explored the culturally enriching city of Havana in Cuba.</p> <p>But the good times were cut short after they returned to the dock where their cruise ship was supposed to take them on the rest of their four-night voyage – only to realise the ship had already left without them.</p> <p>The Norwegian Sky cruise was listed on an itinerary to leave Havana at 5pm, so the couple arrived at the dock at 3:30pm, ready to go, but the ship had left earlier than scheduled.</p> <p>“It was a frightening situation. We were devastated,” says Mr Rohrer in a complaint issued to the cruise company.</p> <p>“We exchanged money and we took a taxi to the airport. American Airlines told us they wouldn’t take a credit card and quoted us 472 pesos (A$646). We didn’t have that much money.”</p> <p>After putting all their money together, the American couple were able to book a flight home for two but were not thrilled about their cruising experience being cut short.</p> <p>It also wasn’t comforting to know that the cruise company left them in a foreign country to fend for themselves, and considering the itinerary said the ship will depart at 5pm, the pair had no idea as to how it could have happened.</p> <p>But regardless of the frustration and countless complaints, Mr Rohrer and his girlfriend were not going to be given compensation for their experience, according to Michelle Couch-Friedman from consumer rights group Elliott Advocacy, who Mr Rohrer reached out to for help with his case.</p> <p>Speaking to Elliott Advocacy, Mr Rohrer revealed that after the cruise line had departed, it was then the couple discovered the time to have changed from 5 pm to 2pm. According to him, the company “made no effort to inform travellers of the change".</p> <p>Ms Couch-Friedman obtained a copy of the cruise itinerary, which was booked through a third party. Turns out Mr Rohrer was correct, as it clearly stated the cruise departure time to be 5pm.</p> <p>But in a newsletter sent to the couple prior to their journey from the company, it stated all passengers in Havana should be “all aboard (the ship) at 1:30pm.”</p> <p>The cruise line had changed the itinerary and passengers were informed through their daily newsletter.</p> <p>But Mr Rohrer stood his ground as he said he never had the opportunity to look over the newsletter before the incident occurred.</p> <p>“I provided that figure showing the time of ‘all aboard’ news flyer that was sent to our cabin while we ate breakfast on the boat the third day (second day for Cuba),” he said.</p> <p>“But I didn’t get to read it at the time of the discovery (we had a tight schedule with the Cuban Tour Advocacy). I had folded that flyer and put it in my pocket during our disembarkment from the ship. I read that flyer while waiting for a flight out of Cuba.”</p> <p>But the cruising company did not budge, as they pulled out the terms and conditions, which read: “In all ports of call, it is also the guest’s responsibility to be back on-board the ship no later than one (1) hour prior to the ship’s scheduled departure time. Please be aware that shipboard time may differ from the port of call and it is the guest’s responsibility to follow the shipboard time. In the event a guest misses the ship, it will be the guest’s responsibility to pay all expenses incurred to rejoin the ship.”</p> <p>After an investigation by Ms Couch-Friedman, the cruise company claimed that all passengers were informed a month before of the time change through e-documents.</p> <p>“Additionally, the day before calling into Havana, the Cruise Director announced the new time repeatedly throughout the day and additional signage was placed on the gangway for all those disembarking to see,” the company said.</p> <p>But Mr Rohrer says that he was not notified of any changes to the schedule.</p> <p>But despite the circumstances, Ms Couch-Friedman said that the cruise company's contract of carriage was stated clearly during the time of booking, as timings on the itinerary were never guaranteed.</p> <p>“In the event of strikes, lockouts, stoppages of labour, riots, weather conditions, mechanical difficulties or any other reason whatsoever, Norwegian Cruise Line has the right to cancel, advance, postpone or substitute any scheduled sailing or itinerary without prior notice,” Norwegian’s terms and conditions read.</p> <p>“Norwegian Cruise Line shall not be responsible for failure to adhere to published arrival and departure times for any of its ports of call.”</p> <p>Ms Couch-Friedman advised passengers to remain alert as cruise itineraries could change at short notice.</p> <p>“This is especially important if you have booked your own shore excursion,” she said.</p> <p>“It may cost a little more money to book the excursion through the cruise line, but you can be certain that the boat won’t sail away without you during your adventure.</p> <p>“In the end, it’s the traveller’s responsibility to know when to be back on-board that ship. If you miss your cruise home, unfortunately, there’s no one to turn to for a refund or reimbursement.”</p> <p>Do you think the passengers were in the wrong or the cruise company? Let us know in the comments below.</p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

The costly road rule that many drivers don’t know

<p>There is one road rule that is flying under the radar and costing Aussies hundreds of dollars in fines.</p> <p>Most drivers are under the impression that they have to give way to people entering a roundabout on their right, but drivers are also meant to give way to those already on the roundabout.</p> <p>“There seems to be a bit of a misconception that when you approach the roundabout you look to the right to see if another vehicle is approaching the roundabout and wait,” NRMA’s Peter Khoury told <a href="https://au.news.yahoo.com/road-rule-no-one-getting-right-cost-hundreds-074809860.html" target="_blank"><strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Yahoo7.</span></em></strong></a></p> <p>“You actually give way to vehicles that are already on the roundabout to ensure the smooth flow of traffic.”</p> <p>Motorists need to give way to cars driving through the roundabout from all directions and if you don’t, you can face some hefty consequences.</p> <p>Drivers in NSW who don’t give way to cars on roundabouts can be hit with a $330 fine and lose three demerit points. In South Australia, the offense costs $419 and three demerit points, and $159 in Victoria.</p> <p>If drivers in Queensland are caught breaking this road rule, they will get fined $378 and lose three demerit points.</p> <p>In Western Australia, drivers will lose three demerit points and will have to pay $150 if they don’t give way at a roundabout.</p> <p>Drivers in Tasmania will be hit with a $159 fine and lose three demerit points.</p> <p>Mr Khoury said there is a lot of confusion around road rules on roundabouts.</p> <p>He said another rule that many drivers do not know is when they should indicate when entering and exiting a roundabout.</p> <p>Drivers who are exiting the roundabout to the left or the right must indicate when entering the roundabout and again when they exit.</p> <p>Motorists driving straight do not need to indicate when entering the roundabout but need to indicate when exiting.</p> <p>“Any misconceptions we need to clear up because there’s a lot of traffic at these locations,” Mr Khoury said.</p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

The costly reality of online romance fraud

<p><em><strong>Cassandra Cross, Lecturer in Criminology, Queensland University of Technology, talks about online romance fraud and the impact its having on Australians.</strong></em></p> <p>Online dating and romance scams continue to lure in Australians with <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-updates-on-scam-disruption-project" target="_blank">figures</a></strong></span> this week showing people have lost more than A$23 million this year alone, with average individual losses at A$21,000 – three times higher than other types of fraud.</p> <p>The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) set up the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.accc.gov.au/consumers/consumer-protection/protecting-yourself-from-scams/scam-disruption-project" target="_blank">Scam Disruption Project</a></strong></span> in August to help target those it believes have been caught in such scams. Over three months it sent 1,500 letters to potential victims in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory.</p> <p>The figures released this week show that 50 people have been scammed, losing a total A$1.7 million – that’s an average of A$34,000 per victim. Almost three quarters of the scams were dating and romance related, which saw it evolve into the number one category of fraud victimisation.</p> <p>Romance scams continue to pose a problem – despite the efforts of the police and ACCC – so why is it that people continue to fall for them?</p> <p><strong>First contact</strong></p> <p>From my experience interviewing victims, it starts out innocently. An online message from a dating website or social media, a “like”, a “wink” or a “kiss”. After that initial connection, it moves to an off-site messenger service. Long conversations, day and night, over email, messenger or the telephone.</p> <p>Over days, weeks, months or even years a relationship develops. But then it happens – the request for money. It may be a few hundred dollars or it may be several thousand. The request can be for a medical emergency, a travel request or any number of things.</p> <p>By that stage, the level of trust and rapport is so strong and the level of perceived intimacy so great, that the victim complies and sends money. For so many, that first transfer is the beginning of a heartbreaking and costly journey.</p> <p>But as the ACCC points out:</p> <p><em>Whatever the story, once the victim pays a scammer the money is gone and the chance of ever recovering the loss is almost nil.</em></p> <p>To prevent such losses the ACCC started its Scam Disruption Project to seek out potential victims and attempt to stop them sending money overseas.</p> <p>This follows similar approaches undertaken in other jurisdictions, notably <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.scamnet.wa.gov.au/scamnet/Fight_Back-Project_Sunbird.htm" target="_blank">Project Sunbird</a></strong></span> in Western Australia, which exemplifies a proactive way to combat this type of fraud.</p> <p>As an outsider, it is difficult to understand how a person becomes a victim. It seems somewhat outrageous that a person could send large amounts of money to a person they have not met in person.</p> <p>It’s too easy to <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://eprints.qut.edu.au/61011/" target="_blank">blame the victim</a></strong></span>, hold them responsible for their loss and reinforce the shame and guilt they are already feeling. But this ignores the role of the offenders in this situation and the ways in which they employ high level manipulation, exploitation and social engineering tactics to ensure compliance from their victims.</p> <p><strong>We’re more open online</strong></p> <p>Everyone has a weakness or vulnerability. Being human implies that we are all fallible. For those seeking relationships online, their weakness is the desire to find love.</p> <p>Studies which explore characteristics of <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://sml.comm.cornell.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/2011-Jiang-Bazarova-Hancock-Self-disclosure-intimacy-link-in-computer-mediated-communication.pdf" target="_blank">online relationships</a></strong></span> have found increased self-disclosures online compared to face-to-face interactions.</p> <p>Combined with research which asserts online communication as the enabler of “<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="https://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/media/people/monica-whitty/Whitty_romance_scam_report.pdf" target="_blank">hyperpersonal relationships</a></strong></span>” (overly intense relationships), this literature helps frame how individuals are manipulated into losing money to someone they have not physically met.</p> <p>Over the years, I’ve interviewed around 150 victims and they do not fit a prescribed stereotype. The idea that victims are greedy and stupid is simply a myth used to perpetuate the idea that “we” cannot be victims, that “we” are different to those who become victims and that “we” are too smart and impenetrable to any type of fraud.</p> <p>Instead, I’ve found that romance fraud affects men and women, young and old (though older people are more attractive targets), from a variety of educational, occupational and socio-economic backgrounds.</p> <p>I’ve also found that people cope differently from this experience: some are angry, some are depressed, some talk of suicide, while others spend every waking hour trying to figure out how they were scammed and try to prevent it happening to others.</p> <p>There are still many victims who are not able to come to terms with what is happening and despite intervention from family, friends and even law enforcement, they refuse to acknowledge the deception.</p> <p><em>CASE STUDY: A woman in her 50s was approached by a man in America. She developed a relationship with him, which included her talking and emailing his “daughter”. She lost $A30,000 before she realised it was a fraud and stopped sending money.</em></p> <p><em>But she became a victim in a secondary scam, from bank officials in another country claiming her “husband” had opened an account in her name. She lost another $A30,000 trying to access these funds.</em></p> <p><em>She reconnected with the original man, believing that they both may have been scammed by this banking official and that she might be able to continue her relationship with him. In the process, she has lost all her savings, her house, her job and it put immense strain on her relationships with family and friends.</em></p> <p>This case study is typical and from the outside it is easy to see that the person is being scammed, yet they continue to put themselves at the mercy of the offenders.</p> <p>But this just demonstrates the level of manipulation that exists in these relationships as well as the strength and intensity of the bond that offenders are able to establish to continually convince the victim that their “love” is real.</p> <p>Media are littered with other stories of <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.scamwatch.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/780314" target="_blank">men</a></strong></span> and <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/good-weekend/love-me-dont-the-west-african-online-scam-using-us-soldiers-20141205-11szid.html" target="_blank">women</a></strong></span> who have suffered at the hands of online offenders, and are fully aware of what happened. These people have not only had to deal with the financial impact of the fraud but also grieve the loss of the relationship which formed the central part of the ruse.</p> <p>Then there are those who have shouldered the burden in silence, fearful of the reaction they would get from family, friends and law enforcement agencies.</p> <p>For the brave victims who do come forward and disclose, in many instances their situation is dismissed by their family and friends, they are further stigmatised in these circles and unable to get any acknowledgement about what happened from law enforcement and other agencies. This only further traumatises the victim and reinforces their existing notions of self-blame.</p> <p><strong>Avoiding the heartache</strong></p> <p>In terms of prevention, it is difficult to promote a message which encompasses the complexity of online romance fraud. But it has to be more than clichéd responses of “if it seems too good to be true, it probably is” or caveats such as “don’t send money to people you don’t know”.</p> <p>These are irrelevant in this situation. Rather, prevention needs to come in the form of acknowledgement, of recognising the fact that no one is immune to fraud when using online dating to find relationships.</p> <p>Instead, it should be a simplistic message that focuses on one key element: the protection of money across all circumstances.</p> <p>Despite the reality of romance fraud, it shouldn’t act as a catalyst to abandon the search for love online. Instead, it should serve as a warning. No matter where the online relationship is at, if a request comes through for money, the answer should always be a firm “no”.</p> <p><em>Written by Cassandra Cross. Republished with permission of <a href="http://www.theconversation.com" target="_blank"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Conversation</span></strong></a>.<img width="1" height="1" src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/35263/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-advanced" alt="The Conversation"/></em></p>

Legal

Our Partners