Placeholder Content Image

Supermarkets accused of pushing "confusing" promo labels

<p>Coles, Woolworths and Aldi have all been accused of saturating their stores with "confusing" promotional labels that offer little to no discount. </p> <p>Research by consumer advocacy group Choice suggests one-in-four shoppers feel "misled" by discount stickers, finding it difficult to discern the promo price from the original price. </p> <p>More than 1,000 customers across the country took part in the <a title="www.choice.com.au" href="https://www.choice.com.au/unclearsupermarketspecials" target="_blank" rel="noopener">research</a>, which surveyed price tags regularly used by Woolworths, Coles and Aldi that featured phrases such as “down down”, “member price” and “prices dropped”.</p> <p>According to the report, which has been passed on to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) Supermarkets Inquiry, it was Coles that caused the most confusion, with their "while stocks last" stickers proving to be unclear to the average shopper. </p> <p>Coles told <em><a href="https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/woolworths-coles-and-aldi-accused-of-confusing-promotional-labels/news-story/c2a350bd62dd0a0ba9c4fad04fa69435" target="_blank" rel="noopener">news.com.au</a></em> its “while stocks last” tickets offer customers the chance to buy items which are only available at Coles for a limited time, and which are unlikely to be restocked once the products are sold out.</p> <p>But according to Choice, one-third of shoppers surveyed believed products tagged with the bright yellow tag were discounted, while another third were unsure of its meaning. </p> <p>Woolworths’ “member price” was also found to cause “considerable confusion”, according to the consumer watchdog.</p> <p>Meanwhile Aldi’s “super savers” label were also found to leave many Aussies confused, with a third of those surveyed unsure if it was a discount, according to the research. </p> <p>“Consumers look for products that are the best value for money but it is becoming increasingly difficult for people to decipher the promotional tags being used by the supermarkets,” Choice said.</p> <p>“Consumers are drawn to promotional tags that make it look like one product is potentially better value or a good deal, compared to other products."</p> <p>However, the labels are “confusing and potentially misleading” and without contextual information or historical pricing data, “consumers have no way of knowing if they are getting a good deal or not."</p> <p>Coles, Woolworths and Aldi have all responded to the report, with Coles saying in a statement, “Customer feedback is important to us. Our goal is to always be as clear as possible and we are taking steps to update this ticket over the coming months.”</p> <p>Choice has called for “transparent pricing” from supermarkets in the report “to ensure that people are able to effectively compare products, recognise genuine discounts and make informed decisions” when buying their groceries. </p> <p>Choice is also calling for strong enforcement action from the ACCC to “send a clear message to the supermarkets that misleading pricing is unacceptable”.</p> <p><em>Image credits: Choice </em></p>

Money & Banking

Placeholder Content Image

Eagle-eyed motorists spot funny typo on "confusing" new interchange

<p>The new interchange at Rozelle, in Sydney's inner west, has already copped backlash just days after its opening,  because of the confusing signage and changed traffic conditions causing chaos among commuters. </p> <p>Now, motorists have spotted another awkward blunder at the bustling "spaghetti junction", intended to improve traffic. </p> <p>Just metres away from the main intersection along Victoria Road and Darling Street, some poor road worker made the same typo twice, in a left-hand turn lane.</p> <p>Instead of saying  "buses excepted", they painted "buses expected", and now their mistake has gone viral on social media. </p> <p>"If I was a road, I'd expect buses too," one joked.</p> <p>"I get my bus near there and I'm constantly expecting buses that don't show, so seems accurate," another quipped. </p> <p>The interchange itself has been years in the making and opened up on Sunday. </p> <p>It was intended to connect drivers to the M4 and M8 tunnels, the City West Link, the Western Distributor and give access to the Anzac Bridge with a toll-free bypass of Victoria Road. </p> <p>While the aim of it was to improve traffic flow, just four days after its opening locals are still complaining about the chaotic strip, specifically it's poorly designed signage that has reportedly baffled drivers. </p> <p>One of the new signs suggested there was a toll from Iron Cove Bridge to Anzac Bridge, and while it is actually free, commuters are avoiding the tunnel and trying to switch across multiple roads to avoid presumed fee. </p> <p>Earlier this week, NSW Premier Chris Minns said: "Clearly it's confusing, that spaghetti junction is difficult to navigate and a lot of cars' GPS haven't caught up.</p> <p>"We'll change that sign and I understand the Minister for Roads is putting up those portable electronic signs to show people that you can use that road in particular and not pay the toll."</p> <p><em>Images: Twitter/ 9News</em></p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

"What am I missing?" Driver confused over hefty parking fine

<p>A woman has been left shocked over a $300 parking fine, for an offence she had no idea she was committing. </p> <p>The confused motorist was puzzled when she received a $305 fine in the mail, and decided to take to Facebook to ask her community if they could "help [her] understand the fine".</p> <p>The woman, from Sydney's inner west, posted photos of her parking job to a local Facebook page, which show her blue hatchback parked curbside outside a house, with no apparent signal nearby. </p> <p>"I got fined $305 and lost some demerits points. They said I parked parallel close to the dividing line/strip," she explained. "I don't see anything wrong with the pics. What am I missing?" she questioned alongside photos of offence.</p> <p>According to parking rules in New South Wales, drivers "must not park within 3m of any double dividing lines" and those caught doing so can be fined.</p> <p>In the photos, the double lines appear close to the woman's car on a seemingly narrow road.</p> <p>One person explained the rule on in the comments of her Facebook post, writing, "It's possibly because there is not enough room for cars to pass your car without partly crossing their car across the double middle lines — it's illegal for them to do that."</p> <p>So you can't park in a place where there isn't enough space between the double middle lines and your car for other cars to pass."</p> <p>The parking rule surprised many who admitted they "had no idea" the rule existed, with some concluding you "see it all the time".</p> <p>"Sorry you got those fines. Wow. You learn something new every day," said one driver. "I had no idea this was a road rule until now! I'm sorry you copped such a huge fine," said another, to which the driver concluded it an "expensive lesson learnt". </p> <p><em>Image credits: Facebook</em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Small detail in Coles BYO container scheme sparks confusion

<p dir="ltr">A new sustainability scheme has left shoppers at Coles scratching their heads due to one seemingly counterintuitive detail.</p> <p dir="ltr">The retailer’s Together to Zero campaign has seen a handful of stores begin trialling a “bring your own packaging” scheme allowing customers to use reusable containers for items purchased from the deli counter.</p> <p dir="ltr">However, many are puzzled by one requirement of the scheme - the containers must be plastic.</p> <p dir="ltr">A sign displayed in a trial store in Blackwood, South Australia, which asked shoppers to “help reduce packaging” by bringing their own containers for deli workers to fill was shared on Facebook earlier this week by a shopper encouraging others to take part in the scheme.</p> <p dir="ltr">The sign also included requirements that the containers were “clean and intact”, had a “reusable lid”, and weren’t made of “glass or ceramic”.</p> <p dir="ltr">With the banning of single-use bags and plastic tableware, some questioned the sustainability project’s reliance on plastic over more sustainable options.</p> <p dir="ltr">“Shame there’s no glass containers allowed, but still a good move,” one person commented.</p> <p dir="ltr">“I only have glass so it’s completely useless for me,” another shared.</p> <p dir="ltr">“More crap to take to the store,” a third pointed out.</p> <p dir="ltr">Others shared concerns over the condition of containers that people would bring in, as well as the risk of food poisoning.</p> <p dir="ltr">“As much as I love the reusable option. I have fears about this. People will be bringing in manky containers that have sat in their cars for two days to refill,” one concerned person wrote.</p> <p dir="ltr">“How does this cover them for food poisoning?” another asked.</p> <p dir="ltr">Despite the concerns, some were more optimistic about the trial, with one person describing it as a “good start” and another sharing that they would “make a special trip or two” to take part.</p> <p dir="ltr">The trial of BYO containers will be taking place across several South Australian Coles supermarkets, including those in Burnside, Blackwood, Unley, Bridgewater, Mount Barker and Murray Bridge, as well as a store in Kew, Victoria.</p> <p dir="ltr">During the trial, the BYO containers aren’t allowed to be used for deli salads, frozen prawns, barbecue items, hot food, deli express products, or self-serve cheese or platters.</p> <p dir="ltr">A Coles spokesperson said the company was closely monitoring feedback of the trial, telling <em><a href="https://www.news.com.au/finance/business/retail/coles-byo-containers-program-lashed-over-one-detail-with-customers-confused-over-rules/news-story/69032894b46e7174e79e203384850cd0" target="_blank" rel="noopener">news.com.au</a></em> that it will inform whether the scheme is rolled out to additional stores across the country.</p> <p dir="ltr">“As part of our Together to Zero Waste ambition, Coles is always looking for ways to reduce reliance on unnecessary single-use plastic, while giving customers sustainable options to help them complete their shop,” the spokesperson said.</p> <p dir="ltr">“We are trialling bring-your-own containers at a handful of Coles supermarket delis in South Australia, to understand how best to provide this option to customers while continuing to meet stringent food safety standards.</p> <p dir="ltr">“We will be looking closely at how our South Australian customers respond, and the feedback and insights will inform our consideration for potentially rolling this out to more stores in South Australia, or around Australia.”</p> <p><span id="docs-internal-guid-2c7628bd-7fff-be79-f009-18570245750d"></span></p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image: Facebook</em></p>

Food & Wine

Placeholder Content Image

Motorists "gobsmacked" by confusing fines that are about to DOUBLE

<p>Transport officials in Queensland have warned residents to be on high alert as the installation of new high tech cameras has seen tens of thousands of fines issued in just a few months. </p> <p>The infrared cameras, which detect both mobile phone and seatbelt offences, were launched in Queensland in July last year. </p> <p>For their first three months of use, the cameras generated warnings to motorists doing the wrong thing. </p> <p>Since November, the cameras have been issuing fines, catching more than 75,000 people in just six months.</p> <p>Annabelle Brett was shocked when she received a fine in the mail, thinking she had been caught for speeding. </p> <p>"But when I saw that it was a seatbelt fine I was pretty gobsmacked," Brett told <em>A Current Affair</em>.</p> <p>Annabelle claims she always wears her seatbelt and was confused by the $400 fine. </p> <p>"If you are driving over 60 kilometres an hour, in my car and most modern cars nowadays anyway, it (the seatbelt alarm) goes mental. Like it's beeping the whole time," she said.</p> <p>After posting about her fine online, the Queensland resident was inundated with messages from other drivers who had received similar fines. </p> <p>One of those people was Antony Tseng, who was also caught on the new seatbelt cameras.</p> <p>"I thought initially, that's impossible, because I always wear my seatbelt. I drive a Tesla which is quite savvy in terms of technology; it would have obviously let me know," Tseng said.</p> <p>Andrew Mahon from Transport and Main Roads Queensland said the cameras rarely get it wrong.</p> <p>"The technology is exceptional, the image quality is very high quality and we can always determine whether or not an offence has occurred," Mahon said.</p> <p>Of the 75,000 fines handed out in the past six months, 20,000 have been for seatbelt offences.</p> <p>Currently the fine for not wearing a seatbelt, or not wearing it correctly is $413, but it will go up to $1078 from July 1st.</p> <p><em>Image credits: Getty Images</em></p>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

Confusion, financial pressure, discomfort: older people can struggle with sustainable living, despite its obvious benefits

<p>Improving the sustainability of Australia’s housing stock is <a href="https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&amp;rls=en&amp;q=building+sector+australia+emissions+the+conversation&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8">crucial</a> to meeting national emissions reduction goals. But for older adults, such changes can bring both benefits and challenges.</p> <p>My <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360132321007344">recent research</a> examined the literature on environmental sustainability measures at residences for older adults. These included private homes, retirement villages and nursing homes.</p> <p>I found that while sustainability measures can bring multiple benefits to older people, they also bring challenges. For example, people living in sustainable dwellings may use less energy and water which leads to lower bills. But older people may suffer cognitive decline and struggle to use sustainable technology devices.</p> <p>The full effects of environmentally sustainable features must be better understood if we’re to provide seniors with high-quality residential environments.</p> <p><img src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/441440/original/file-20220119-15-60lcsc.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt="Older man walks down corridor" /> <span class="caption">Sustainability measures can bring benefits and challenges to older people.</span> <span class="attribution"><span class="source">Shutterstock</span></span></p> <h2>Sustainability and ageing: a complex mix</h2> <p>Forecasts suggest that by 2056, <a href="https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/population-groups/older-people/overview">22% of Australians</a> – or 8.7 million people – will be aged 65 or older. High-quality residential environments are important to maintaining the welfare of these people as they age.</p> <p>Environmental sustainability is playing an ever greater role in residential development across the board, including retirement villages. And <a href="https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jar/2014/919054/">previous research</a> suggests most retirement village residents want to lead more sustainable lifestyles.</p> <p>As climate change worsens, the dwellings of older adults should allow them to adapt to these changing conditions. The reduced ability of elderly people to regulate their body temperature means global warming is a profound threat to this group.</p> <p>Improving the sustainability of a residential environment may include:</p> <ul> <li>reducing waste</li> <li>using low carbon or recycled building materials</li> <li>solar passive design</li> <li>efficient heating and cooling</li> <li>using renewable energy such as rooftop solar.</li> </ul> <p><a href="https://new.gbca.org.au/case-studies/building/stockland-takes-sustainability-retirement-living/">Some residential projects</a> for the elderly already include environmental sustainability. A <a href="https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/F-08-2011-0060/full/html">case study</a> of a not-for-profit retirement village in South Australia revealed practices such as innovative floor plans, thermally efficient building materials, good window orientation and a water harvesting system.</p> <p>And my previous research <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652619341605">found</a> a range of sustainability features at eight private and not-for-profit retirement villages in Queensland.</p> <p>However, while many retirement village developers prioritise “social sustainability” features such as care provision and social interaction, environmental sustainability is <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652617313963">largely ignored</a>.</p> <p><img src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/441450/original/file-20220119-25-1qtv5d.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt="elderly woman holds hands of carer" /> <span class="caption">Forecasts suggest that by 2056, 22% of Australians will be aged 65 or older.</span> <span class="attribution"><span class="source">Shutterstock</span></span></p> <h2>On the plus side</h2> <p>The benefits of environmentally sustainable features in in older adults’ residential environment include:</p> <p><strong>- reduced resource consumption:</strong> sustainable dwellings usually require less water and energy use, which lowers living costs. This is especially important for older adults who often have reduced financial capacity after retirement. Older people also use energy <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301421597000402">more intensively</a> than other groups because they have fewer household members, greater heating requirements and spend more time at home.</p> <p><strong>- reduced health risks:</strong> environmentally sustainable measures can lead to healthier indoor environments. For example, good ventilation and high-quality air conditioning often lead to improved indoor air quality and more comfortable ambient temperatures.</p> <p><strong>- alleviated environmental challenges:</strong> many older people want their homes to be more environmentally friendly. Doing their bit to alleviate global problems such as greenhouse gas emissions can provide them with peace of mind.</p> <p><img src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/441438/original/file-20220119-15-124namg.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt="elderly person's hands on heater" /> <span class="caption">Sustainable dwellings usually require less water and energy use,</span> <span class="attribution"><span class="source">Shutterstock</span></span></p> <h2>The potential downsides</h2> <p>The challenges of environmentally sustainable home features for older adults include:</p> <p><strong>- financial pressure:</strong> the income of many older adults is substantially reduced after retirement. This <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301421511005222">can conflict</a> with the high initial investment of developing an sustainable housing and the cost of replacing existing systems with sustainable ones.</p> <p><strong>- reducing energy consumption:</strong> in some cases, sustainability measures can involve tolerating slightly higher or cooler temperatures. For example, moving from a gas-heating system to a more sustainable type may <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421515001172">delay</a> the arrival of heat in a room and leave older people uncomfortable for a short time. This may conflict with older people’s <a href="https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v84y2015icp250-256.html">increased sensitivity</a> to ambient temperatures.</p> <p><strong>- confusion and complexity:</strong> Older adults can have <a href="https://academic.oup.com/bmb/article/92/1/135/332828">reduced cognitive capabilities</a> affecting memory and information processing speed. As a result they may struggle to use sustainable technologies such as smart thermostats. Research has <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301421514006259">suggested</a> ways of overcoming this, such as better recognising the diversity of older adults to achieve a better “person-technology fit”.</p> <p><img src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/441437/original/file-20220119-25-fkfanl.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt="Four older women shelter from the sun under umbrella" /> <span class="caption">Older people may have increased sensitivity to hot or cold temperatures.</span> <span class="attribution"><span class="source">Paul Miller/AAP</span></span></p> <h2>Next steps</h2> <p>Older adults have unique needs which their homes <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360132321007344">must satisfy</a>, even when sustainability features are being adopted.</p> <p>Ageing should be seen as a dynamic process with physical, psychological and social dimensions. And the complex interrelationships of ageing, environmental sustainability and the residential environment also need to be recognised.</p> <p>Best practices and lessons learned in creating sustainable living environments for older adults should be <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652618325241">shared</a>.</p> <p>Finally, developers making sustainability decisions should consult other stakeholders. These include contractors, occupational therapists, researchers and most importantly, older adults themselves.<!-- Below is The Conversation's page counter tag. Please DO NOT REMOVE. --><img style="border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important; text-shadow: none !important;" src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/174535/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /><!-- End of code. If you don't see any code above, please get new code from the Advanced tab after you click the republish button. The page counter does not collect any personal data. More info: https://theconversation.com/republishing-guidelines --></p> <p><span><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/xin-hu-685656">Xin Hu</a>, Lecturer, School of Architecture and Built Environment, <em><a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/deakin-university-757">Deakin University</a></em></span></p> <p>This article is republished from <a href="https://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/confusion-financial-pressure-discomfort-older-people-can-struggle-with-sustainable-living-despite-its-obvious-benefits-174535">original article</a>.</p> <p><em>Image: Shutterstock</em></p>

Retirement Income

Placeholder Content Image

Shoppers left confused by Aldi refund policy

<p dir="ltr">A woman has sparked a heated discussion online after sharing her experience seeking a refund at an Aldi store in the US. Writing in the Aisle of Shame Facebook group, she wrote, “I bought the big tree bag at Aldi for $29.99 on Wednesday. Got it home, and out of the box only to realise it’s much too massive for anything I could ever need so decided to return.”</p> <p dir="ltr">After heading back to the store and enquiring about a refund, she was informed that she was only entitled to half of what she paid for the item as the item had since been marked down.</p> <p dir="ltr">She wrote, “I was unaware that if you buy an... item at full price and days later it’s price gets cut in half, you should expect the half price for the return and not the full price, even though that’s what you paid. Even if it’s still marked in the aisle for full price, and I had a receipt.”</p> <p dir="ltr">This took place at an Aldi store in Ohio, but Aldi customers from all over the globe have weighed in, with one suggesting the incident was “illegal”, writing, “Wait, what?! But you had a receipt showing you paid full price!”</p> <p dir="ltr">Many group members went on to debate the store’s refund policy, with some suggesting that a policy designed to protect the store from after-Christmas returns may have been at play. One user commented, "Was it bought before Christmas and returned after? As someone who has worked retail during Halloween you'd be shocked how many people try to get their money back after the Holiday,” while another wrote, “Usually there is a policy posted about seasonal and clearance items.”</p> <p dir="ltr">Aldi employees even weighed in, with one commenting, “I’m an Assistant Store Manager at an Aldi, policy is with receipt you get back what you paid for! If you don't have a receipt you get what the system says,” and another confirming, I’m an Aldi employee. Whoever did your return did it wrong. You should have gotten what you paid for if you had your receipt.”</p> <p dir="ltr">The customer clarified that she had no hard feelings towards her local Aldi and would be heading back to have the situation rectified by a manager.</p> <p dir="ltr">Fortunately, this would never happen in Australia. An Aldi spokesperson confirmed to Yahoo News Australia that if a customer has a receipt showing they paid the original price, that price would be refunded. Aldi Australia’s money back guarantee covers change of mind, grocery items, and Special Buys. The policy states, “Shop like you’ve got nothing to lose. Because you don’t.”</p> <p dir="ltr"><em>Image: Dinendra Haria/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images</em></p>

Money & Banking

Placeholder Content Image

"So confusing": Road rules quiz leaves drivers frustrated

<p>The Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads has sparked a debate on social media about road rules, which has left many drivers furious.</p> <p>The question was about how to use a roundabout correctly.</p> <p>“The car is exiting the roundabout at the first exit. The motorbike is driving straight ahead through the roundabout. Does the motorbike need to indicate when entering and exiting the roundabout?” the department asked on Facebook.</p> <p><iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FTMRQld%2Fphotos%2Fa.295748123801411%2F3758932614149594%2F&amp;width=500&amp;show_text=true&amp;height=653&amp;appId" width="500" height="653" style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="true" allow="autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; picture-in-picture; web-share"></iframe></p> <div class="post_body_wrapper"> <div class="post_body"> <div class="body_text redactor-styles redactor-in"> <p>People were quick to comment on their guesses, as the post racked up more than 1,300 replies from road users.</p> <p>“I believe the correct rule as I was told is the bike should indicate right on entering then indicate left to exit,” one person commented.</p> <p>“The motorcycle doesn't have to signal on entry because it is effectively going straight. All vehicles have to signal when exiting a roundabout,” another person wrote.</p> <p>The Department of Transport and Main Roads posted the correct answer, which left many people angry as they rarely saw other motorists follow the rules.</p> <p>“The answer is.... As the motorbike is travelling straight ahead, they are not required to indicate on entry. However, before exiting they must indicate left and continue to indicate until they have exited the roundabout,” the department wrote.</p> <p>“I think so many people buy cars without indicators now or think they’re optional extras,” another person complained.</p> <p>“Anyone who can't answer this question correctly should have to resit their driving test,” a user suggested.</p> </div> </div> </div>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

"So confusing": Jackie O gets stumped by "simple" maths question

<div class="post_body_wrapper"> <div class="post_body"> <div class="body_text redactor-styles redactor-in"> <p>Beloved radio host Jackie 'O' Henderson was left scratching her head after a listener called up with a confusing maths question.</p> <p>Listener Liam called into<span> </span><em>The Kyle and Jackie O<span> </span></em>show to ask the maths question designed for year two students.</p> <p>“I’ve only ever seen a couple of people get it, but it’s so simple; it’s really not hard,” he told Jackie O and Kyle Sandilands.</p> <p>“If you buy a baseball bat and a baseball and your total is a $1.10 and the bat cost one dollar more than the ball, how much is the ball?”</p> <p>“10 cents, right?” Jackie quickly answered, only to be told she was wrong.</p> <blockquote style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/CK2Mj9OB_C1/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="13"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/CK2Mj9OB_C1/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank">A post shared by Kyle and Jackie O (@kyleandjackieo)</a></p> </div> </blockquote> <p> </p> <p>“Jeez I can’t understand, because you’ve spent a $1.10, so there’s only a $1.10 spent, if it’s a dollar more,” she said.</p> <p>The right answer came from newsreader Brooklyn Ross, who guessed that the ball was 5 cents and the bat was $1.05.</p> <p>“I think I’ve even heard that before but I’ve forgotten the answer,” Jackie said. “It’s one of those famous questions.”</p> <p>“That hurts my brain,” one person wrote, while another said it was “so confusing”.</p> <p>Behavioural economist Daneil Kahneman said that most people get this question wrong because people rely on intuition to problem solve and for this question, intuitively the answer seems like it should be 10 cents.</p> <p>He explained the concept in his book<span> </span><em>Thinking, Fast and Slow,<span> </span></em>but further explained the idea to<span> </span><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.businessinsider.com.au/question-that-harvard-students-get-wrong-2012-12?r=US&amp;IR=T" target="_blank"><em>Business Insider</em></a>.</p> <p>“The distinctive mark of this easy puzzle is that it evokes an answer that is intuitive, appealing and wrong,” he wrote in an excerpt published by<span> </span><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.businessinsider.com.au/question-that-harvard-students-get-wrong-2012-12?r=US&amp;IR=T" target="_blank"><em>Business Insider.</em></a></p> <p>“Many people are overconfident, prone to place too much faith in their intuitions.</p> <p>“They apparently find cognitive effort at least mildly unpleasant and avoid it as much as possible.”</p> </div> </div> </div>

Technology

Placeholder Content Image

“Please explain”: Customer demands answers from Coles over confusing milk label

<p class="p1">A Coles shopper has spotted a misleading label on its home brand milk and demanded answers.</p> <p class="p1">Taking to the Coles Facebook page, the customer from Tasmania wanted to purchase a bottle of Coles Full Cream Milk, which was advertised on the front label as a product of Tasmania.</p> <p class="p1">However, on the back of the bottle it stated the milk was “sourced from Queensland farms and bottled in Queensland”.</p> <p class="p1">The frustrated customer asked Coles to “please explain” as she posted a photo of the milk in question.</p> <p class="p1">The shopper had purchased the bottle from Coles Burnie in Tasmania and said it was important for her to shop local.</p> <p class="p1">“Tasmanian products are very important to me,” she wrote.</p> <p class="p1">Another customer responded to the post and said they found it hard to purchase and support local farmers.</p> <p class="p1">“Milk is ‘frustrating’ to purchase. You try to do the right thing and support your local farmers, but dig a little deeper and many of what you think are small independently run/owned brands are not!” a user wrote.</p> <p class="p1">A spokesperson for the grocery store apologised for the mishap and clarified to Yahoo News Australia that a number of bottles sold in Tasmanian stores had been labelled incorrectly.</p> <p class="p1">“All Coles Brand milk sold in Tasmania is supplied by Tasmanian dairy farmers and bottled locally.</p> <p class="p1">“This is an unfortunate labelling error that impacted a small number of bottles and is currently being fixed.</p> <p class="p1">“We apologise to our Tasmanian customers for any confusion,” a Coles spokesperson told Yahoo News.</p>

Food & Wine

Placeholder Content Image

Confusing road rules question strikes again

<div class="post_body_wrapper"> <div class="post_body"> <div class="body_text redactor-styles redactor-in"> <p>A confusing question posted by Queensland's Department of Transport has had drivers fighting with each other in the Facebook comments.</p> <p>The Department of Transport posted a graphic of a car entering a roundabout and challenged social media users to "prove they know their road rules".</p> <p>"The driver of the blue car is turning right at the roundabout. Which of the following is the correct way to indicate so that the other drivers know what they intend to do?" the Department asked.</p> <iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FTMRQld%2Fphotos%2Fa.295748123801411%2F3465883320121193%2F&amp;show_text=true&amp;width=552&amp;height=659&amp;appId" width="552" height="659" style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allow="encrypted-media"></iframe> <p>The quiz had four options, with option A saying no indicating was needed, option B saying that you don't indicate when entering the roundabout but you indicate left before exiting, option C was indicating right while approaching and entering the roundabout and indicate left before indicating and finally, option D was indicating right while approaching, entering and exiting the roundabout.</p> <p>The answer to the question is option C, but he quiz quickly turned into drivers harassing other drivers for their refusal to follow basic road rules. </p> <p>“C, although cars in Bundaberg don’t come fitted with indicators,” one quipped.</p> <p>“We all know C is the correct answer, but A and B is how most people drive these days,” another weighed in.</p> <p>Others mused how “amazing” it was how few people knew their road rules.</p> <p>“Interesting statistics here, all comments 100 per cent correct, only one per cent will do the right thing …” another said.</p> <p>"All the ones that say C, do you actually do it?" one questioned.</p> </div> </div> </div>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

"Not obvious to everyone": Road rule quiz sparks confusion

<div class="post_body_wrapper"> <div class="post_body"> <div class="body_text redactor-styles redactor-in"> <p>A road rule question that was posted on Facebook has left people scratching their heads at how others have missed the obvious answer.</p> <p>The Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads asked who had the right of way with a picture of an orange car planning to turn left with a blue car in the opposite direction wanting to turn right down the same street.</p> <p>People said it was too confusing straight off the bat.</p> <p>“Too confusing as you not often see two cars using their indicators,” one said.</p> <p>“Legally it’s the orange car but if the blue car takes right of way the orange car should yield otherwise there is an accident where people are injured or killed then there is absolutely no point of having road rules in the first place,” another said.</p> <iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FTMRQld%2Fphotos%2Fa.295748123801411%2F3446702908705901%2F&amp;show_text=true&amp;width=552&amp;height=615&amp;appId" width="552" height="615" style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allow="encrypted-media"></iframe> <p>“Sometimes you may get a very busy intersection with built-up traffic behind the blue car, so a thoughtful law-breaking orange car will hold back and wave the blue car through to get the flow moving again,” a third added.</p> <p>“The blue car is in a dangerous position and should be given priority to get out of the intersection,” another claimed.</p> <p>The correct answer is that the orange car has the right of way.</p> <p>“I almost thought this was a trick question because it seemed so obvious. I guess it’s not obvious to everyone – which is how accidents happen,” somebody commented.</p> <p>“If you can’t answer this one you shouldn’t be on the road,” another concerned road user said.</p> </div> </div> </div>

Travel Trouble

Placeholder Content Image

"I'm so confused": WHO lockdown "backflip" leaves Karl scratching his head

<div class="post_body_wrapper"> <div class="post_body"> <div class="body_text redactor-styles redactor-in"> <p>A World Health Organisation (WHO) doctor claimed on the <em>Today</em> show that reports WHO had backflipped on lockdowns are wrong.</p> <p>However, the new advice she gave the <em>Today</em> show left co-hosts Alison Langdon and Karl Stefanovic more confused than ever.</p> <p>On the weekend, another doctor from WHO, Dr David Nabaro, said that world leaders should "stop using lockdowns as your primary control method" of the coronavirus pandemic.</p> <p>He also claimed that the only thing lockdowns achieved was poverty without mentioning the potential lives saved.</p> <p>Dr Margaret Harris appeared on the <em>Today</em> show to try and clear things up.</p> <p>She explained that the comments Dr Nabaro gave were “misreported” by the world’s media.</p> <p>“It is not a backflip, it is not a change in advice,” she said. “What it is a bit of misreporting that has gone on, on the weekend.</p> <p>“What those reports are based on were a conversation our special envoy, Dr David Nabaro had about the role of lockdowns.</p> <p>“Lockdowns are basically mass quarantines and governments have got to the stage where they have huge transmission going on and is it not clear exactly where the chains of transmission are, it is a thing that governments have resorted to.</p> <p>“But right from the start we have said what we would really like to see is a strong tracking, tracing, the community hand washing, mask wearing so that you don’t have to go into lockdown.</p> <p>“Now a lot of countries have had to go to lockdown but we say do all of the other things to avoid going there, because the economic and social costs are very high.”</p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> <p dir="ltr">A startling backflip by the World Health Organisation, now recommending global leaders stop locking down countries and economies. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/9Today?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#9Today</a> <a href="https://t.co/MOUQ3iryzw">pic.twitter.com/MOUQ3iryzw</a></p> — The Today Show (@TheTodayShow) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheTodayShow/status/1315383331953967111?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 11, 2020</a></blockquote> <p>Stefanovic asked whether or not Queensland should have its borders closed, given there are no active coronavirus cases in the area.</p> <p>“This is something that different authorities make different decisions about and we as the WHO don’t come in and boss around individual countries,” she said. </p> <p>“We trust different countries to look at what works in their society. What isn’t working in their society and what will be the best way to prevent transmission.”</p> <p>Stefanovic wasn't happy with that answer and said it was "slightly soft".</p> <p>“Well, what we really say is do it all,” she responded. “We say don’t just do one thing. Don’t just rely on your border closure or your mass quarantine, do absolutely everything you can because where we are seeing a failure or we are seeing a rise in cases people have focused just one thing and this is again where lockdowns can be problematic.</p> <p>“When people come out of lockdowns they think, ‘OK, it is over, we don’t have to do all of the other things any more’ and in fact it is all the other things that really work.”</p> <p>He then asked her whether Australia should open its borders to the rest of the world.</p> <p>“What we are seeing that really works is strong quarantine and strong monitoring at borders,” she said. “So if you are looking at, really following everybody who comes in, really putting them in quarantine, really putting them in quarantine, really making sure that happens, then we are certainly seeing that is what prevents transmission.”</p> <p>In order to get some clarification, Karl asked whether this means we should open the borders but still enforce a two-week quarantine once people arrive.</p> <p>“So what we are saying is exactly, manage your borders. No whether it is open or closed but really, really manage your borders,” Dr Harris said.</p> <p>Both <em>Today</em> hosts were visibly muddled by this point. Stefanovic finished the interview by saying “I’m so confused”.</p> <p>The confusing interview comes after comments from Dr Nabarro, saying that the WHO does not "advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus".</p> <p>“The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganise, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it,” he said.</p> <p>He urged world leaders to look at the global impact and see how poorer economies have been impacted by the shutdowns.</p> <p>“Look what’s happened to smallholder farmers all over the world. … Look what’s happening to poverty levels. It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition.”</p> <p>“And so, we really do appeal to all world leaders: stop using lockdown as your primary control method. Develop better systems for doing it. Work together and learn from each other.”</p> </div> </div> </div>

News

Placeholder Content Image

Morrison’s mixed messages on the coronavirus

<p>The Morrison Government recently introduced a range of measures and restrictions on the Australian public, as Coronavirus infections continue to rise.</p> <p><strong>Some of these new rules include:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Non-essential gatherings of more than 100 people are forbidden</li> <li>Pubs, clubs, sporting and religious venues are closed</li> <li>Restaurants and cafes will only be allowed to offer takeaway services. </li> <li>No more than one person per four square metres in a room, including outdoor events</li> <li>In addition, we’re all to practice, wherever possible the 1-metre or 1.5-metre distance between each of us. </li> <li>Hand hygiene products must be made available in all venues</li> <li>Restricted travel into remote Indigenous communities</li> <li>All non essential domestic travel should be avoided </li> <li>Visits to prisoners being reviewed. </li> </ul> <p>No doubt there are more to come, and of course the federal and state governments are well within their rights to impose these measures in the face of a pandemic. A lot has been said about personal space, with <a href="https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/will-coronavirus-lead-to-a-rise-in-domestic-violence-offences/">people encouraged to stay home as much as possible</a> and keep away from each other in shared spaces.</p> <p>The result of the harsher crackdowns were a direct response to footage of Sydney-siders taking advantage of a beautifully warm autumn day and ignoring the ‘self-distancing’ recommendations, at Bondi Beach and cafes and restaurants. The Government reacted harshly, moving to close beaches. Effective immediately. This will be enforced by lifeguards and police. That said, the rule is hazy at best, considering it was originally intended that Bondi would only be open to 500 people at a time.</p> <p>All of this is, of course, designed to ensure that we are limiting potential opportunities for the spread of the virus.</p> <p><strong>Did the Government act swiftly enough?</strong></p> <p>But in recent weeks a number of health  experts have slammed the Morrison Government for not acting more swiftly on Coronavirus. They believe that if the government had made essential quarantine decisions earlier, we could potentially have substantially curtailed the rise in the number of infections. They’ve also criticised the ‘mixed messages’ coming from our leaders.</p> <p><a href="https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/news/politics/2020/03/21/what-morrison-did-wrong-coronavirus/15847092009555?fbclid=IwAR03E6i-SqQBgw8GRzKObpwCBwpvGd3MqP-OK38qIVDMz2-jXFgsLOuwrmo">One such expert is Bill Bowtell</a>, an adjunct professor at the Kirby Institute for infection and immunity at the University of New South Wales. He designed Australia’s world-leading response to the AIDS epidemic several decades ago. More recently, he worked for 15 years with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.</p> <p>He says the Government knew about the severity of <a href="https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/what-does-the-law-say-about-self-quarantining-in-nsw/">Coronavirus</a> 12 weeks ago, and at that time should have accumulated testing kits, brought in necessary emergency equipment and medical supplies, provided money for science and vaccine research and immediately begun a public educational campaign.</p> <p>He points to the swift decision-making of a handful of nations – South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong – that responded early and decisively and have succeeded in flattening the curve of infections, if not stopping the spread of Covid-19 almost completely.</p> <p>For example, in China, just three weeks after the World Health Organisation and Wuhan health authorities were alert to the appearance of a new disease, the Chinese government ordered what has been called the largest quarantine in history. As a result, four months later, the country us beginning to move on from the threat of Coronavirus.</p> <p>Instead, Australia’s response has been similar to the approaches taken in Europe and America, where cases have been, and still are, growing exponentially.</p> <p><strong>Impending strain on the health system</strong></p> <p>Now, as more Australians test positive for the virus, in the weeks and months ahead we’re likely to see an incredible strain on our already stretched health system. OECD data shows us well down the list on the number of hospital beds: 3.8 per 1000 population. That is about the same as Norway, a little ahead of Italy and Spain, but way behind Japan and Korea, which have nearly four times as many. Even China has more.</p> <p>The Australian Medical Association (AMA) is seriously concerned that face masks, and other protective supplies are at an alarming shortage for medical staff, and many staff are fearful they have not had the appropriate training to deal with patients who have the virus.</p> <p>There are questions whether the recent Federal Government pledge of $2.4 billion to the health sector is actually going to be enough.</p> <p><strong>Mixed messages</strong></p> <p>The Australian Medical Association (AMA) has also been critical of the mixed messages that have been given to all Australians, too.</p> <p>At a press conference in February Scott Morrison assured Australians: “There is no need for us to be moving towards not having mass gatherings of people. You can still go to the football, you can still go to the cricket … You can go off to the concert, and you can go out for a Chinese meal. You can do all of these things because Australia has acted quickly.”</p> <p>More recently he said he was going to watch his beloved Cronulla Sharks – a decision that was reversed just hours later.</p> <p>Only last week Chief Medical Officer, Brendan Murphy, said people should practise social distancing with recently returned travellers and / or people known to have come into contact with the virus, but that it was otherwise permissible to be close and shake hands. That advice too, has since been changed.</p> <p>More alarmingly, on the same day Bondi Beach was ordered closed, the government allowed 2,700 people to walk off a cruise ship in Sydney’s CBD which had reported more than 150 illnesses. At least five people from the Ruby Princess have since tested positive to Covid-19, some of whom boarded domestic flights home.<br /><br /></p> <p><a href="https://www.9news.com.au/national/coronavirus-ama-wa-president-doctors-losing-confidence-in-scott-morrison-response/29ce2b69-3a4e-4975-9188-b006fc46b7f5">The AMA in Western Australia is also calling for state borders to be shut</a>. New South Wales and Victoria are said to be in discussions about whether or not to draw a line, and the NT has already effectively done so – enforcing anyone who enters the Territory into strict quarantine.</p> <p><strong>So what happens now?</strong></p> <p>Even though the Government has certainly flexed its muscle in terms of enforcing a range of new rules and regulations, there’s still a remarkable lack of ‘leadership’ at this critical time. If social media is any gauge, by and large, people are polarised when it comes to what they believe and how we should react to Coronavirus.  </p> <p><strong>But we are facing two truths: </strong></p> <ol> <li>Cases of Coronavirus are on the rise. </li> <li>There’s still an overwhelming amount of mis-information in the media and public domain about how to avoid contracting it and what to expect if we do. </li> </ol> <p>As of 21 March, in Australia there are more than 1,000  confirmed cases – and by State, NSW has the highest number of infections – 461. There have been 7 deaths. While the mortality rate remains low, the concern has always been Coronavirus will severely impact people who are elderly, frail, or have pre-existing health conditions.</p> <p><em>Written by Sonia Hickey. Republished with permission of <a href="https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/morrisons-mixed-messages-on-the-coronavirus/">Sydney Criminal Lawyers.</a></em></p> <p><em> </em></p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

8 things we do that really confuse our dogs

<p>Dog behaviour is extraordinarily flexible – this is why we can keep them in our homes and take them to cafes with us at the weekend.</p> <p>Nevertheless, there are ways in which evolution has not equipped dogs for the challenges of living in our world, and puppies must learn how to cope.</p> <p>These are some of the things we do they struggle to understand.</p> <p><strong>1. We leave them alone</strong></p> <p>As born socialites, dogs make friends easily. Puppies are intensely interested in spending time with other dogs, people, and any species willing to interact with them socially. They usually play, rest, explore and travel with company. Yet we often leave dogs alone: at home, in kennels or the vet clinic.</p> <p>In these situations, naive dogs can’t be sure we’ll ever return to collect them. Only after experience are they likely to expect a reunion, and even then, their experience depends on the context.</p> <p>At home, we may try to enforce dog-free zones. Naturally, many dogs protest. How can they stay with their (human) social group when they’re separated behind impenetrable barriers (doors)? This explains why dogs so often demand to be let inside when their human family is there, and why those with separation-related distress frequently find some solace in being indoors.</p> <p><strong>2. We are visually driven</strong></p> <p>Dogs live in an olfactory world, while ours is chiefly visual. So, while TVs may offer a visual feast for humans, parks and beaches are an olfactory banquet for dogs.</p> <p>An additional challenge is dogs move while investigating the world, whereas we often sit still. They may not relish the inertia we enjoy in front of a noisy, flashing light-box.</p> <p><strong>3. We change our shape and smell</strong></p> <p>Shoes, coats, wallets, briefcases, bags and suitcases: countless smells cling to these items after we take them into shops and workplaces, then back to our dogs. Cleaning products, soaps, deodorants and shampoos also change the scents our dogs are used to.</p> <p>Towels, hats and bags change our shape when we’re using them. And when we’re pulling them on, jumpers and coats alter our visual outline and may catch dogs unaware.</p> <p>Dogs change their coats at least once a year. In contrast, we change our external cladding every day. This means the odours we carry are changing far more than dogs have evolved to expect.</p> <p>In their olfactory world, it must be puzzling for dogs to encounter our constantly changing smells, especially for a species that uses scent to identify familiar individuals and intruders.</p> <p><strong>4. We like to hug</strong></p> <p>How humans use their forelimbs contrasts sharply with how dogs do. We may use them to carry large objects a dog would have to drag, but also to grasp each other and express affection.</p> <p>Dogs grasp each other loosely when play-wrestling, and also when mating and fighting. Being pinned by another dog hinders a quick escape. How are puppies to know what a hug from a human means, when that behaviour from a dog might be threatening?</p> <p><strong>5. We don’t like to be bitten</strong></p> <p>Play-fighting is fun for many puppies and helps them bond with other dogs. But they must monitor the behaviour of other dogs in play-fights and know when they’ve used their tiny, razor-sharp teeth excessively.</p> <p>Humans are much more susceptible to pain from playful puppy jaws than other dogs are, and so we can react negatively to their attempts to play-fight with us.</p> <p>Dogs interact with objects almost entirely with their muzzle. And to feed, they use their jaws, teeth and tongue.</p> <p>Dogs also “mouth” other dogs when playing, expressing affection and communicating everything from “more” to “please don’t” to “Back off!”. So, naturally, they try to use their mouths when communicating with us, and must be puzzled by how often we take offence.</p> <p><strong>6. We don’t eat food from the bin</strong></p> <p>Dogs are opportunists who naturally acquire food anywhere they find it. In contrast, we present them with food in dishes of their own.</p> <p>Puppies must be puzzled by our reaction when we find them snacking from benches and tables, in lunchboxes and kitchen bins. We should not be surprised when dogs unearth food we left somewhere accessible to them.</p> <p><strong>7. We share territories</strong></p> <p>We visit the territories of other dogs, bringing back their odours, and allow unfamiliar human and canine visitors to enter our dogs’ home. Dogs have not evolved to accept such intrusions and threats to their safety and resources.</p> <p>We shouldn’t be surprised when our dogs treat visitors with suspicion, or when our dogs are treated with hostility when we bring them to the homes of others.</p> <p><strong>8. We use our hands a lot</strong></p> <p>Sometimes our hands deliver food, scratches, massages and toys. Other times, they restrain dogs, trim nails, administer ointments or tablets, and groom with brushes and combs that may pull hair.</p> <p>No wonder some dogs grow to fear the human hand as it moves about them. We can make it easier for dogs to accept many types of hand-related activities if we train them to cooperate with rewards.</p> <p>But humans often misread their fear and may even greet it with violence which compounds the problem. Hand-shy dogs can easily become defensive and find their way into pounds and shelters, where life expectancy for nippers and biters is poor.</p> <p>On the whole, dogs show a remarkable ability to adapt to the puzzles we throw at them. Their behavioural flexibility offers us lessons in resilience and how to live simply and socially. Our challenge is to understand the absence of guile and malice in everything they do.<!-- Below is The Conversation's page counter tag. Please DO NOT REMOVE. --><img style="border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important; text-shadow: none !important;" src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/122616/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" /><!-- End of code. If you don't see any code above, please get new code from the Advanced tab after you click the republish button. The page counter does not collect any personal data. More info: http://theconversation.com/republishing-guidelines --></p> <p><em><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/melissa-starling-461103">Melissa Starling</a>, Postdoctoral researcher, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-sydney-841">University of Sydney</a> and <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/paul-mcgreevy-139820">Paul McGreevy</a>, Professor of Animal Behaviour and Animal Welfare Science, <a href="https://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-sydney-841">University of Sydney</a></em></p> <p><em>This article is republished from <a href="http://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/8-things-we-do-that-really-confuse-our-dogs-122616">original article</a>.</em></p>

Family & Pets

Placeholder Content Image

Why Prince Harry and Meghan’s new titles are even confusing Buckingham Palace

<p>When Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan announced they would be stepping down as senior members of the royal family, a spanner was thrown into the works of a meticulously run Palace – one that is still having trouble smoothing out all the kinks.</p> <p>Buckingham Palace announced the Duke and Duchess of Sussex would be giving up not only their royal duties but the role of representing the Queen in a formal capacity and their HRH titles.</p> <blockquote style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/B7ld5OWnQ4N/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="12"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/B7ld5OWnQ4N/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank">A post shared by Duchess of Sussex (@sussex.meghan)</a> on Jan 21, 2020 at 6:41am PST</p> </div> </blockquote> <p>When the statement was released, royals from the palace also verified that the pair would now be dubbed Harry, Duke of Sussex, and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex.</p> <p>However, as it would turn out, it is not as straightforward as it seems and according to a new report from<span> </span><em><a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-and-prince-harrys-titles-post-exit-have-sparked-confusion-even-among-royal-aides/" target="_blank">PEOPLE</a>,<span> </span></em>Palace experts are reviewing the new titles of Prince Harry and Meghan.</p> <p>According to latest sources, the new title involves both Princess Diana and Sarah Ferguson who divorced from their royal spouses – Prince Charles and Prince Andrew – and as a result, were touted as Diana, Princess of Wales, and Sarah, Duchess of York.</p> <p>The issue is – there has not been any divorce between Prince Harry and Meghan so questions arise as to whether their new titles are in fact correct.</p> <p>While there's no sure answer yet as to what the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s official titles will be moving forward, we can still refer to them as their Royal Highnesses until their transition period deadline of Spring 2020 is over.</p> <p>Prince Harry’s position in line to the throne has not changed and he remains sixth-in-line while his son, eight-month-old Archie is just behind his dad as seventh-in-line.</p> <blockquote style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 540px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/B7krFoaioIY/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="12"> <div style="padding: 16px;"> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div> </div> </div> <div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"></div> <div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div> </div> <p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" rel="noopener" href="https://www.instagram.com/p/B7krFoaioIY/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" target="_blank">A post shared by Meghan and Harry❤ (@meghan_and_harry)</a> on Jan 20, 2020 at 11:17pm PST</p> </div> </blockquote> <p>Last Monday, Prince Harry attended the Sandringham Summit to discuss his and Duchess Meghan’s future with the Queen, Prince Charles and Prince William.</p> <p>Following Kensington Palace announcing the new plans set in place for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Harry attended a private dinner for charity Sentebale and delivered a hearty and emotional speech.</p> <p>"It brings me great sadness that it has come to this," he told the room.</p> <p>"The decision I have made for my wife and I to step back is not one I made lightly... Our hope was to continue serving the Queen, the Commonwealth and my military associations, but without public funding. Unfortunately, that wasn't possible."</p> <p>He continued: "I've accepted this, knowing that it doesn't change who I am or how committed I am.</p> <p>"But I hope that helps you understand what it had to come to, that I would step my family back from all I have ever known, to take a step forward into what I hope can be a more peaceful life."</p> <p>Prince Harry is believed to be back in Canada with Meghan and Archie, where they plan to forge ahead with their new life away from the prying eyes of the British tabloids.</p>

Relationships

Placeholder Content Image

Drivers bamboozled over three-way speed limit

<p>A confusing Sydney road featuring three different signs enforcing the speed limit has baffled drivers. </p> <p>A reddit user posted an image of the road with multiple signs with the caption “Let’s play a game.”</p> <p>One sign told drivers to a red light speed camera, saying the speed limit is 50km/h. On the ground, leaning up against that sign post is another sign which says 40km/h due to road work. </p> <p>However, to add to the confusing sage, on the road, the big “60” indicates the speed limit is 60km/h.</p> <p>The road is O’Riordan Street approaching Gardeners Road in Alexandria, in Sydney’s inner city.</p> <p>“Legally, the speed limit is enforced if the numbers are surrounded by a red ring. So the numbers on the road virtually mean nothing, in the eyes of the road laws,” one user wrote.</p> <p>“It's 40. Road work signs supersede the posted limit,” another added.</p> <p>“I work for the traffic control company that is in that area, if it is Alexandria. They're meant to cover other signs if they put out a 40 sign, so someone was lazy,” one Reddit user wrote.</p> <p>The photo was then taken to Facebook page<span> </span>Dash Cam Owners Australia<span> </span>which managed to cause a stir. </p> <p>“The police have answered this question before when it's asked, they say the lowest speed limit is the one that applies,” one informative person replied. </p> <p>A few Facebook users joked all the speeds together should be added together so 40, 50 and 60, which would equal 150km/h.</p> <p>O’Riordan Street’s speed limit was reduced from 60km/h to 50km/h on October 13, 2019. </p> <p>The Road and Maritime Service website reads “Where a road work speed limit sign is displayed, the speed limit is enforceable and must be obeyed.</p> <p>“When approaching roadworks pay attention to all signs and obey reduced speed signs.”</p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Do you do this in a drive-thru? The $500 road rule confusing Aussies

<p>A new Facebook post by the Victoria Police has confused and stunned motorists who have definitely used this way to grab their coffee, meals and snacks at a drive thru of fast-food restaurant chains.  </p> <p>Police asked social media users last Friday to vote in a poll that read:</p> <p>“When using a fast-food outlet’s drive-through service, can I use my phone to pay?”</p> <p>51,000 people voted and a whopping 65 per cent said that yes, you can use your phone to pay.</p> <p><iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fvictoriapolice%2Fposts%2F2927840057288111&amp;width=500" width="500" height="491" style="border: none; overflow: hidden;" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allow="encrypted-media"></iframe></p> <p>Those who voted yes were quickly shown the door as the police gave the right answer to the question.</p> <p>“If you intend to use your mobile phone to pay at the drive-thru window, apply the hand brake, switch the engine off and then access your mobile phone,” Victoria Police wrote.</p> <p>“In doing so, you are not considered driving.”</p> <p>Victoria Police told <em><a rel="noopener" href="https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/motoring/on-the-road/aussie-motorists-confused-by-drivethru-rule/news-story/fe3060291a7d8ebdb495291b3f2bf331" target="_blank">news.com.au</a></em> that officers were encouraged to use “discretion and common sense in their everyday duties”.</p> <p>Naturally, people were not impressed with the road rules.</p> <p>“That is bloody ridiculous,” one person commented. “Does that mean I can pull on the hand brake, turn off the car at traffic lights and use my phone? I am hoping this is a joke.”</p> <p>One added: “You can’t seriously argue that using a mobile phone to pay for the food is too dangerous, but leaning out of the car window (often with both hands) to collect your food, drinks, whatever, is fine.”</p> <p>Others were quick to point out that it’s sad that others didn’t know the road rules at all.</p> <p>“A drive-through is not private property, all road rules apply while using a drive-through. How can people not understand this?” one person asked.</p> <p>If you’re thinking that these rules don’t apply to you because you’re not in Victoria, that’s not the case. This road rule is enforced around the country.</p> <p>A Transport NSW spokesperson said to <em>news.com.au</em> that the mobile phone rules apply to drivers on all roads and road-related areas.</p> <p>“A road-related area is an area that is open to or used by the public for driving, riding or parking vehicles and therefore includes drive-throughs,” the spokesperson said.</p> <p>The police from NSW, ACT, Northern Territory and South Australia also confirmed it was an offence to have a mobile phone in your hand while sitting in a running car at a drive-thru.</p> <p>Here are the road penalties for everyone caught using their mobile phone to pay through a drive-thru. The fines are definitely steeper in some states than others.</p> <p><strong>Victoria</strong>: $484 fine and four demerit points</p> <p><strong>NSW</strong>: $344 fine and five demerit points</p> <p><strong>Tasmania</strong>: $336 and three demerit points</p> <p><strong>South</strong> <strong>Australia</strong>: $534 and three demerit points</p> <p><strong>Queensland</strong>: $400 fine and three demerit points</p> <p><strong>Western Australia:</strong> $400 fine and three demerit points</p> <p><strong>Northern</strong> <strong>Territory</strong>: $500 and three demerit points</p> <p><strong>ACT</strong>: $470 and three demerit points</p>

Legal

Placeholder Content Image

Mysterious “blob” 130 kms wide causes confusion amongst meteorologists

<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A “blob” that appeared on the US National Weather Service’s radar had meteorologists worried as they thought it was a massive storm on the way.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The mass, which was about 130 kilometres wide went over San Diego County in Southern California.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">However, on closer inspection, it appeared to be a massive swarm of ladybugs. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Meteorologist Joe Dandrea told </span><a href="https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-ladybugs-on-radar-20190604-story.html"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Los Angeles Times</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> that the ladybugs were spread throughout the sky and flew at an altitude of between 1500 kilometres and 2700 kilometres.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The most concentrated group was about 16 kilometres wide. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“I don’t think they’re dense like a cloud,” he said. “The observer there said you could see little specks flying by.”</span></p> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en-gb"> <p dir="ltr">The large echo showing up on SoCal radar this evening is not precipitation, but actually a cloud of lady bugs termed a "bloom" <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CAwx?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#CAwx</a> <a href="https://t.co/1C0rt0in6z">pic.twitter.com/1C0rt0in6z</a></p> — NWS San Diego (@NWSSanDiego) <a href="https://twitter.com/NWSSanDiego/status/1136115889516867586?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">5 June 2019</a></blockquote> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">As California is home to about 200 species of ladybugs, it’s not yet known what type of ladybugs were causing the phenomenon.</span></p>

Travel Trouble

Our Partners